Cargando…

Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Work-related stress is a major concern. One of the best performing models is the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) of Karasek, assessing job demand and job control using 18 items. However, the JCQ is long and complex. Visual Analogue Scales (VASs) are easy to use and quick to implement. VA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dutheil, Frederic, Pereira, Bruno, Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste, Clinchamps, Maëlys, Brousses, Georges, Dewavrin, Samuel, Cornet, Thomas, Mermillod, Martial, Mondillon, Laurie, Baker, Julien S, Schmidt, Jeannot, Moustafa, Farès, Lanhers, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046403
_version_ 1784671420074164224
author Dutheil, Frederic
Pereira, Bruno
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Clinchamps, Maëlys
Brousses, Georges
Dewavrin, Samuel
Cornet, Thomas
Mermillod, Martial
Mondillon, Laurie
Baker, Julien S
Schmidt, Jeannot
Moustafa, Farès
Lanhers, Charlotte
author_facet Dutheil, Frederic
Pereira, Bruno
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Clinchamps, Maëlys
Brousses, Georges
Dewavrin, Samuel
Cornet, Thomas
Mermillod, Martial
Mondillon, Laurie
Baker, Julien S
Schmidt, Jeannot
Moustafa, Farès
Lanhers, Charlotte
author_sort Dutheil, Frederic
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Work-related stress is a major concern. One of the best performing models is the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) of Karasek, assessing job demand and job control using 18 items. However, the JCQ is long and complex. Visual Analogue Scales (VASs) are easy to use and quick to implement. VASs have been validated to assess pain and occupational stress; however, VASs demand and control have not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to validate the use of VAS demand and control compared with the 18 items of the JCQ. DESIGN: We implemented a cross-sectional observational study, by administering a self-reported questionnaire to the users of Wittyfit software, with a second test (retest) proposed 1 week later. In addition to JCQ, VAS demand and control, we measured sociodemographic outcomes, as well as characteristics of work, sleep, well-being, stress, depression and anxiety. PARTICIPANTS: 190 volunteers French workers using WittyFit software participated in the study, and 129 completed the test–retest. RESULTS: VAS demand and VAS control correlated with the two Karasek domains from the JCQ, respectively, at 0.59 and 0.57 (p<0.001). Test–retest reliability highlighted concordance coefficients higher than 0.70. Sensitivity was higher than 70% for each VAS. External validity was acceptable. For both demand and control, VAS cut-offs were 75/100. Compared with other workers, senior executives and individuals with master’s degrees had higher levels of job control but did not differ in job demand using the VAS and JCQ. CONCLUSIONS: VAS demand and VAS control are valid, quick, easy to use, and reliable tools for the assessment of job demand and job control. They can be used in daily clinical practice for primary prevention and diagnosis. However, when results are over 75 mm on VAS, we promote the use of JCQ to be more discriminant and specific to initiate action plans to help workers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02596737.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89322712022-04-01 Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study Dutheil, Frederic Pereira, Bruno Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste Clinchamps, Maëlys Brousses, Georges Dewavrin, Samuel Cornet, Thomas Mermillod, Martial Mondillon, Laurie Baker, Julien S Schmidt, Jeannot Moustafa, Farès Lanhers, Charlotte BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: Work-related stress is a major concern. One of the best performing models is the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) of Karasek, assessing job demand and job control using 18 items. However, the JCQ is long and complex. Visual Analogue Scales (VASs) are easy to use and quick to implement. VASs have been validated to assess pain and occupational stress; however, VASs demand and control have not been evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to validate the use of VAS demand and control compared with the 18 items of the JCQ. DESIGN: We implemented a cross-sectional observational study, by administering a self-reported questionnaire to the users of Wittyfit software, with a second test (retest) proposed 1 week later. In addition to JCQ, VAS demand and control, we measured sociodemographic outcomes, as well as characteristics of work, sleep, well-being, stress, depression and anxiety. PARTICIPANTS: 190 volunteers French workers using WittyFit software participated in the study, and 129 completed the test–retest. RESULTS: VAS demand and VAS control correlated with the two Karasek domains from the JCQ, respectively, at 0.59 and 0.57 (p<0.001). Test–retest reliability highlighted concordance coefficients higher than 0.70. Sensitivity was higher than 70% for each VAS. External validity was acceptable. For both demand and control, VAS cut-offs were 75/100. Compared with other workers, senior executives and individuals with master’s degrees had higher levels of job control but did not differ in job demand using the VAS and JCQ. CONCLUSIONS: VAS demand and VAS control are valid, quick, easy to use, and reliable tools for the assessment of job demand and job control. They can be used in daily clinical practice for primary prevention and diagnosis. However, when results are over 75 mm on VAS, we promote the use of JCQ to be more discriminant and specific to initiate action plans to help workers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02596737. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8932271/ /pubmed/35301199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046403 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Dutheil, Frederic
Pereira, Bruno
Bouillon-Minois, Jean-Baptiste
Clinchamps, Maëlys
Brousses, Georges
Dewavrin, Samuel
Cornet, Thomas
Mermillod, Martial
Mondillon, Laurie
Baker, Julien S
Schmidt, Jeannot
Moustafa, Farès
Lanhers, Charlotte
Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title_full Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title_short Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
title_sort validation of visual analogue scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046403
work_keys_str_mv AT dutheilfrederic validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT pereirabruno validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT bouillonminoisjeanbaptiste validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT clinchampsmaelys validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT broussesgeorges validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT dewavrinsamuel validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT cornetthomas validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT mermillodmartial validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT mondillonlaurie validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT bakerjuliens validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT schmidtjeannot validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT moustafafares validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy
AT lanherscharlotte validationofvisualanaloguescalesofjobdemandandjobcontrolattheworkplaceacrosssectionalstudy