Cargando…
Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314 |
_version_ | 1784671496355971072 |
---|---|
author | Owais, Aatekah Wuehler, Sara Heidkamp, Rebecca Mehra, Vrinda Neufeld, Lynnette M. Rogers, Lisa M. Saha, Kuntal Kumar |
author_facet | Owais, Aatekah Wuehler, Sara Heidkamp, Rebecca Mehra, Vrinda Neufeld, Lynnette M. Rogers, Lisa M. Saha, Kuntal Kumar |
author_sort | Owais, Aatekah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron‐containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron‐containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron‐containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%–75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron‐containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8932708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89327082022-03-24 Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study Owais, Aatekah Wuehler, Sara Heidkamp, Rebecca Mehra, Vrinda Neufeld, Lynnette M. Rogers, Lisa M. Saha, Kuntal Kumar Matern Child Nutr Original Articles Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron‐containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron‐containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron‐containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%–75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron‐containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8932708/ /pubmed/35092159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Owais, Aatekah Wuehler, Sara Heidkamp, Rebecca Mehra, Vrinda Neufeld, Lynnette M. Rogers, Lisa M. Saha, Kuntal Kumar Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title | Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title_full | Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title_fullStr | Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title_short | Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study |
title_sort | critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: insights from a mixed‐methods study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owaisaatekah criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT wuehlersara criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT heidkamprebecca criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT mehravrinda criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT neufeldlynnettem criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT rogerslisam criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT sahakuntalkumar criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy |