Cargando…

Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study

Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owais, Aatekah, Wuehler, Sara, Heidkamp, Rebecca, Mehra, Vrinda, Neufeld, Lynnette M., Rogers, Lisa M., Saha, Kuntal Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314
_version_ 1784671496355971072
author Owais, Aatekah
Wuehler, Sara
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mehra, Vrinda
Neufeld, Lynnette M.
Rogers, Lisa M.
Saha, Kuntal Kumar
author_facet Owais, Aatekah
Wuehler, Sara
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mehra, Vrinda
Neufeld, Lynnette M.
Rogers, Lisa M.
Saha, Kuntal Kumar
author_sort Owais, Aatekah
collection PubMed
description Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron‐containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron‐containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron‐containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%–75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron‐containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8932708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89327082022-03-24 Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study Owais, Aatekah Wuehler, Sara Heidkamp, Rebecca Mehra, Vrinda Neufeld, Lynnette M. Rogers, Lisa M. Saha, Kuntal Kumar Matern Child Nutr Original Articles Daily consumption of iron‐containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron‐containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron‐containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron‐containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron‐containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%–75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron‐containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8932708/ /pubmed/35092159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Owais, Aatekah
Wuehler, Sara
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mehra, Vrinda
Neufeld, Lynnette M.
Rogers, Lisa M.
Saha, Kuntal Kumar
Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title_full Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title_fullStr Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title_full_unstemmed Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title_short Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed‐methods study
title_sort critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron‐containing supplementation coverage: insights from a mixed‐methods study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13314
work_keys_str_mv AT owaisaatekah criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT wuehlersara criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT heidkamprebecca criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT mehravrinda criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT neufeldlynnettem criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT rogerslisam criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT sahakuntalkumar criticalassessmentofthecurrentindicatorforantenatalironcontainingsupplementationcoverageinsightsfromamixedmethodsstudy