Cargando…
What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study
Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) status is far from the national target in China. To identify the modifiable factors associated with EBF of infants aged under 6 months in China. A cross‐sectional study was conducted in 12 provinces/municipalities across China in 2017–2018. We used multistage stratified...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13324 |
_version_ | 1784671499295129600 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Yifan Yang, Zhenyu Bi, Ye Wang, Jie Pang, Xuehong Jiang, Shan Zhang, Huanmei Xu, Lili Lai, Jianqiang |
author_facet | Duan, Yifan Yang, Zhenyu Bi, Ye Wang, Jie Pang, Xuehong Jiang, Shan Zhang, Huanmei Xu, Lili Lai, Jianqiang |
author_sort | Duan, Yifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) status is far from the national target in China. To identify the modifiable factors associated with EBF of infants aged under 6 months in China. A cross‐sectional study was conducted in 12 provinces/municipalities across China in 2017–2018. We used multistage stratified cluster sampling and collected data through face‐to‐face interviews with mothers using an electronic questionnaire. Totally, 5287 pairs of mother–infant aged <6 months were investigated. The EBF prevalence was 29.2% (1544/5287). Mothers with correct knowledge of colostrum (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]:1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 1.62), EBF (AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.81) and the highest scores of perceptions for breastfeeding benefits (AOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.61) were more likely to exclusively breastfeed. However, mothers with more frequent unwillingness of breastfeeding during the first month postpartum were less likely to practice EBF (AOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.90). Infants having their first breast milk within 24 h of birth increased the odds of EBF (AOR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.86, 3.13). Infants were less likely to be exclusively breastfed in the families in which the main caregiver was the grandmothers. Mothers without receiving infant formula feeding suggestions via the health facilities, media, or the Internet (AOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.85) or without the experience of infant formula feeding in public (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.72) might more likely to practice EBF. To acquire comprehensively correct knowledge and keep a positive attitude of breastfeeding for the mothers are crucial for improving the EBF prevalence. Family supports are potential interventions worth focusing on. Infant formula promotion remains a great barrier for EBF in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8932722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89327222022-03-24 What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study Duan, Yifan Yang, Zhenyu Bi, Ye Wang, Jie Pang, Xuehong Jiang, Shan Zhang, Huanmei Xu, Lili Lai, Jianqiang Matern Child Nutr Original Articles Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) status is far from the national target in China. To identify the modifiable factors associated with EBF of infants aged under 6 months in China. A cross‐sectional study was conducted in 12 provinces/municipalities across China in 2017–2018. We used multistage stratified cluster sampling and collected data through face‐to‐face interviews with mothers using an electronic questionnaire. Totally, 5287 pairs of mother–infant aged <6 months were investigated. The EBF prevalence was 29.2% (1544/5287). Mothers with correct knowledge of colostrum (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]:1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07, 1.62), EBF (AOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.81) and the highest scores of perceptions for breastfeeding benefits (AOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.61) were more likely to exclusively breastfeed. However, mothers with more frequent unwillingness of breastfeeding during the first month postpartum were less likely to practice EBF (AOR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.90). Infants having their first breast milk within 24 h of birth increased the odds of EBF (AOR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.86, 3.13). Infants were less likely to be exclusively breastfed in the families in which the main caregiver was the grandmothers. Mothers without receiving infant formula feeding suggestions via the health facilities, media, or the Internet (AOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.85) or without the experience of infant formula feeding in public (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.72) might more likely to practice EBF. To acquire comprehensively correct knowledge and keep a positive attitude of breastfeeding for the mothers are crucial for improving the EBF prevalence. Family supports are potential interventions worth focusing on. Infant formula promotion remains a great barrier for EBF in China. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8932722/ /pubmed/35137523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13324 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Duan, Yifan Yang, Zhenyu Bi, Ye Wang, Jie Pang, Xuehong Jiang, Shan Zhang, Huanmei Xu, Lili Lai, Jianqiang What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title | What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title_full | What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title_fullStr | What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title_short | What are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in China? A cross‐sectional study |
title_sort | what are the determinants of low exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in china? a cross‐sectional study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8932722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanyifan whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT yangzhenyu whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT biye whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT wangjie whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT pangxuehong whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT jiangshan whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT zhanghuanmei whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT xulili whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy AT laijianqiang whatarethedeterminantsoflowexclusivebreastfeedingprevalenceinchinaacrosssectionalstudy |