Cargando…

Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation

PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of lif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkmann, Sebastian, Knepper, Laura, Fuchs, Hans, Hoelscher, Arnulf, Kuhr, Kathrin, dos Santos, Daniel Pinto, Plum, Patrick, Chon, Seung-Hun, Bruns, Christiane, Schroeder, Wolfgang, Leers, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02327-1
_version_ 1784671621296947200
author Brinkmann, Sebastian
Knepper, Laura
Fuchs, Hans
Hoelscher, Arnulf
Kuhr, Kathrin
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
Plum, Patrick
Chon, Seung-Hun
Bruns, Christiane
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Leers, Jessica
author_facet Brinkmann, Sebastian
Knepper, Laura
Fuchs, Hans
Hoelscher, Arnulf
Kuhr, Kathrin
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
Plum, Patrick
Chon, Seung-Hun
Bruns, Christiane
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Leers, Jessica
author_sort Brinkmann, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, not much is known about HRQoL, particularly in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ outcome after non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with focus on HRQoL in the long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment, patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%), and a conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome and quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months. HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. CONCLUSION: HRQoL in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8933311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89333112022-04-01 Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation Brinkmann, Sebastian Knepper, Laura Fuchs, Hans Hoelscher, Arnulf Kuhr, Kathrin dos Santos, Daniel Pinto Plum, Patrick Chon, Seung-Hun Bruns, Christiane Schroeder, Wolfgang Leers, Jessica Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, not much is known about HRQoL, particularly in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ outcome after non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with focus on HRQoL in the long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment, patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%), and a conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome and quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months. HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. CONCLUSION: HRQoL in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8933311/ /pubmed/34562118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02327-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Brinkmann, Sebastian
Knepper, Laura
Fuchs, Hans
Hoelscher, Arnulf
Kuhr, Kathrin
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
Plum, Patrick
Chon, Seung-Hun
Bruns, Christiane
Schroeder, Wolfgang
Leers, Jessica
Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title_full Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title_fullStr Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title_full_unstemmed Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title_short Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
title_sort short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02327-1
work_keys_str_mv AT brinkmannsebastian shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT knepperlaura shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT fuchshans shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT hoelscherarnulf shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT kuhrkathrin shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT dossantosdanielpinto shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT plumpatrick shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT chonseunghun shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT brunschristiane shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT schroederwolfgang shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation
AT leersjessica shortandlongtermfollowupofpatientswithnonneoplasticesophagealperforation