Cargando…

Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment

INTRODUCTION: Tailoring limb length in bariatric surgery is a subject of many studies. To acquire the optimal limb length, accurate measurement of the small bowel length is essential. OBJECTIVE: To assess the intra- and inter-individual variability of laparoscopic bowel length measurement using a ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slagter, Nienke, van Wilsum, Mette, de Heide, Loek J. M., Jutte, Ewoud H., Kaijser, Mirjam A., Damen, Stefan L., van Beek, André P., Emous, Marloes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z
_version_ 1784671630652342272
author Slagter, Nienke
van Wilsum, Mette
de Heide, Loek J. M.
Jutte, Ewoud H.
Kaijser, Mirjam A.
Damen, Stefan L.
van Beek, André P.
Emous, Marloes
author_facet Slagter, Nienke
van Wilsum, Mette
de Heide, Loek J. M.
Jutte, Ewoud H.
Kaijser, Mirjam A.
Damen, Stefan L.
van Beek, André P.
Emous, Marloes
author_sort Slagter, Nienke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tailoring limb length in bariatric surgery is a subject of many studies. To acquire the optimal limb length, accurate measurement of the small bowel length is essential. OBJECTIVE: To assess the intra- and inter-individual variability of laparoscopic bowel length measurement using a hand-over-hand technique with marked graspers. METHOD: Four bariatric surgeons and four surgical residents performed measurements on cadaver porcine intestine in a laparoscopic box using marked graspers. Each participant performed 10 times a measurement of three different lengths: 150, 180, and 210 cm. Acceptable percentage deviation from the goal lengths was defined as less than 10%, while unacceptable deviations were defined as more than 15%. RESULTS: The bariatric surgeons measured the 150-, 180-, and 210-cm tasks with 4% (CI 0.4, 9), − 6% (CI − 11, − 0.8), and 1% (CI − 4, 6) deviation, respectively. In total, the bariatric surgeons estimated 58 out of 119 times (49%) between the margins of 10% deviation and 36 times (30%) outside the 15% margin. Considerable inter-individual differences were found between the surgeons. The surgical residents underestimated the tasks with 12% (CI − 18, − 6), 16% (CI − 19, − 13), and 18% (CI − 22, − 13), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgeons estimated bowel length with on average less than 10% deviation. However, this still resulted in 30% of the measurements with more than 15% deviation. There were considerable inter-individual differences between the surgeons and residents structurally underestimated the bowel length. Ascertainment of measurement accuracy and adequate training is essential for bariatric procedures in which limb length is of importance. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8933352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89333522022-04-01 Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment Slagter, Nienke van Wilsum, Mette de Heide, Loek J. M. Jutte, Ewoud H. Kaijser, Mirjam A. Damen, Stefan L. van Beek, André P. Emous, Marloes Obes Surg Original Contributions INTRODUCTION: Tailoring limb length in bariatric surgery is a subject of many studies. To acquire the optimal limb length, accurate measurement of the small bowel length is essential. OBJECTIVE: To assess the intra- and inter-individual variability of laparoscopic bowel length measurement using a hand-over-hand technique with marked graspers. METHOD: Four bariatric surgeons and four surgical residents performed measurements on cadaver porcine intestine in a laparoscopic box using marked graspers. Each participant performed 10 times a measurement of three different lengths: 150, 180, and 210 cm. Acceptable percentage deviation from the goal lengths was defined as less than 10%, while unacceptable deviations were defined as more than 15%. RESULTS: The bariatric surgeons measured the 150-, 180-, and 210-cm tasks with 4% (CI 0.4, 9), − 6% (CI − 11, − 0.8), and 1% (CI − 4, 6) deviation, respectively. In total, the bariatric surgeons estimated 58 out of 119 times (49%) between the margins of 10% deviation and 36 times (30%) outside the 15% margin. Considerable inter-individual differences were found between the surgeons. The surgical residents underestimated the tasks with 12% (CI − 18, − 6), 16% (CI − 19, − 13), and 18% (CI − 22, − 13), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgeons estimated bowel length with on average less than 10% deviation. However, this still resulted in 30% of the measurements with more than 15% deviation. There were considerable inter-individual differences between the surgeons and residents structurally underestimated the bowel length. Ascertainment of measurement accuracy and adequate training is essential for bariatric procedures in which limb length is of importance. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2022-02-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8933352/ /pubmed/35201571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Slagter, Nienke
van Wilsum, Mette
de Heide, Loek J. M.
Jutte, Ewoud H.
Kaijser, Mirjam A.
Damen, Stefan L.
van Beek, André P.
Emous, Marloes
Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title_full Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title_short Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment
title_sort laparoscopic small bowel length measurement in bariatric surgery using a hand-over-hand technique with marked graspers: an ex vivo experiment
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z
work_keys_str_mv AT slagternienke laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT vanwilsummette laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT deheideloekjm laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT jutteewoudh laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT kaijsermirjama laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT damenstefanl laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT vanbeekandrep laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment
AT emousmarloes laparoscopicsmallbowellengthmeasurementinbariatricsurgeryusingahandoverhandtechniquewithmarkedgraspersanexvivoexperiment