Cargando…
The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2 |
_version_ | 1784671632006053888 |
---|---|
author | Cassioli, Emanuele Calderani, Enrico Fioravanti, Giulia Lazzeretti, Lisa Rotella, Carlo Maria Rossi, Eleonora Ricca, Valdo Mannucci, Edoardo Rotella, Francesco |
author_facet | Cassioli, Emanuele Calderani, Enrico Fioravanti, Giulia Lazzeretti, Lisa Rotella, Carlo Maria Rossi, Eleonora Ricca, Valdo Mannucci, Edoardo Rotella, Francesco |
author_sort | Cassioli, Emanuele |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat. The aim of the study was the validation of the Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED). METHODS: A sample of healthy volunteers was initially enrolled to explore internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Emotional Eating Scale (EES), Eating Disorders Evaluation-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), together with the final version of FEED, were administered to a clinical sample composed by patients with eating disorders, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, to explore the underlying structure of the questionnaire and verify its validity. RESULTS: FEED showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.93). FEED scores were higher in patients with BN and BED than in AN patients, negatively correlated with age and positively with BES and EES. Multiple regression analysis showed that FEED, but not EES, was independently associated with SCL-90-R and EDE-Q scores. CONCLUSION: FEED internal consistency and test–retest reliability were excellent. The addition of specific questions on the frequency of behaviours led to a better component structure and robustness compared to EES. A tool that reliably and specifically assesses eating behaviours driven by emotional states may be extremely useful in clinical settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8933357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89333572022-04-01 The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating Cassioli, Emanuele Calderani, Enrico Fioravanti, Giulia Lazzeretti, Lisa Rotella, Carlo Maria Rossi, Eleonora Ricca, Valdo Mannucci, Edoardo Rotella, Francesco Eat Weight Disord Original Article PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat. The aim of the study was the validation of the Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED). METHODS: A sample of healthy volunteers was initially enrolled to explore internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Emotional Eating Scale (EES), Eating Disorders Evaluation-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), together with the final version of FEED, were administered to a clinical sample composed by patients with eating disorders, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, to explore the underlying structure of the questionnaire and verify its validity. RESULTS: FEED showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.93). FEED scores were higher in patients with BN and BED than in AN patients, negatively correlated with age and positively with BES and EES. Multiple regression analysis showed that FEED, but not EES, was independently associated with SCL-90-R and EDE-Q scores. CONCLUSION: FEED internal consistency and test–retest reliability were excellent. The addition of specific questions on the frequency of behaviours led to a better component structure and robustness compared to EES. A tool that reliably and specifically assesses eating behaviours driven by emotional states may be extremely useful in clinical settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8933357/ /pubmed/34043180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cassioli, Emanuele Calderani, Enrico Fioravanti, Giulia Lazzeretti, Lisa Rotella, Carlo Maria Rossi, Eleonora Ricca, Valdo Mannucci, Edoardo Rotella, Francesco The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title | The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title_full | The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title_fullStr | The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title_full_unstemmed | The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title_short | The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
title_sort | florence emotional eating drive (feed): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cassioliemanuele theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT calderanienrico theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT fioravantigiulia theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT lazzerettilisa theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rotellacarlomaria theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rossieleonora theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT riccavaldo theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT mannucciedoardo theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rotellafrancesco theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT cassioliemanuele florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT calderanienrico florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT fioravantigiulia florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT lazzerettilisa florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rotellacarlomaria florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rossieleonora florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT riccavaldo florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT mannucciedoardo florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating AT rotellafrancesco florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating |