Cargando…

The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating

PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassioli, Emanuele, Calderani, Enrico, Fioravanti, Giulia, Lazzeretti, Lisa, Rotella, Carlo Maria, Rossi, Eleonora, Ricca, Valdo, Mannucci, Edoardo, Rotella, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2
_version_ 1784671632006053888
author Cassioli, Emanuele
Calderani, Enrico
Fioravanti, Giulia
Lazzeretti, Lisa
Rotella, Carlo Maria
Rossi, Eleonora
Ricca, Valdo
Mannucci, Edoardo
Rotella, Francesco
author_facet Cassioli, Emanuele
Calderani, Enrico
Fioravanti, Giulia
Lazzeretti, Lisa
Rotella, Carlo Maria
Rossi, Eleonora
Ricca, Valdo
Mannucci, Edoardo
Rotella, Francesco
author_sort Cassioli, Emanuele
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat. The aim of the study was the validation of the Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED). METHODS: A sample of healthy volunteers was initially enrolled to explore internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Emotional Eating Scale (EES), Eating Disorders Evaluation-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), together with the final version of FEED, were administered to a clinical sample composed by patients with eating disorders, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, to explore the underlying structure of the questionnaire and verify its validity. RESULTS: FEED showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.93). FEED scores were higher in patients with BN and BED than in AN patients, negatively correlated with age and positively with BES and EES. Multiple regression analysis showed that FEED, but not EES, was independently associated with SCL-90-R and EDE-Q scores. CONCLUSION: FEED internal consistency and test–retest reliability were excellent. The addition of specific questions on the frequency of behaviours led to a better component structure and robustness compared to EES. A tool that reliably and specifically assesses eating behaviours driven by emotional states may be extremely useful in clinical settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8933357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89333572022-04-01 The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating Cassioli, Emanuele Calderani, Enrico Fioravanti, Giulia Lazzeretti, Lisa Rotella, Carlo Maria Rossi, Eleonora Ricca, Valdo Mannucci, Edoardo Rotella, Francesco Eat Weight Disord Original Article PURPOSE: Emotional eating is a trans-diagnostic dimension in eating disorders and is present in many other conditions that could affect eating attitudes. At present, there is no instrument that measures emotional eating evaluating both the intensity and the frequency of emotion-induced desire to eat. The aim of the study was the validation of the Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED). METHODS: A sample of healthy volunteers was initially enrolled to explore internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Emotional Eating Scale (EES), Eating Disorders Evaluation-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Binge Eating Scale (BES) and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), together with the final version of FEED, were administered to a clinical sample composed by patients with eating disorders, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, to explore the underlying structure of the questionnaire and verify its validity. RESULTS: FEED showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.93). FEED scores were higher in patients with BN and BED than in AN patients, negatively correlated with age and positively with BES and EES. Multiple regression analysis showed that FEED, but not EES, was independently associated with SCL-90-R and EDE-Q scores. CONCLUSION: FEED internal consistency and test–retest reliability were excellent. The addition of specific questions on the frequency of behaviours led to a better component structure and robustness compared to EES. A tool that reliably and specifically assesses eating behaviours driven by emotional states may be extremely useful in clinical settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8933357/ /pubmed/34043180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Cassioli, Emanuele
Calderani, Enrico
Fioravanti, Giulia
Lazzeretti, Lisa
Rotella, Carlo Maria
Rossi, Eleonora
Ricca, Valdo
Mannucci, Edoardo
Rotella, Francesco
The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title_full The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title_fullStr The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title_full_unstemmed The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title_short The Florence Emotional Eating Drive (FEED): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
title_sort florence emotional eating drive (feed): a validation study of a self-report questionnaire for emotional eating
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01216-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cassioliemanuele theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT calderanienrico theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT fioravantigiulia theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT lazzerettilisa theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rotellacarlomaria theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rossieleonora theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT riccavaldo theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT mannucciedoardo theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rotellafrancesco theflorenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT cassioliemanuele florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT calderanienrico florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT fioravantigiulia florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT lazzerettilisa florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rotellacarlomaria florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rossieleonora florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT riccavaldo florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT mannucciedoardo florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating
AT rotellafrancesco florenceemotionaleatingdrivefeedavalidationstudyofaselfreportquestionnaireforemotionaleating