Cargando…
Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
• To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653 |
_version_ | 1784671715800907776 |
---|---|
author | Hoorzook, K.B. Barnard, T.G. |
author_facet | Hoorzook, K.B. Barnard, T.G. |
author_sort | Hoorzook, K.B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | • To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as a foundation for extracting Escherichia coli DNA from water. The method combinations i.e., guanidium thiocyanate, celite and home-made spin column were chosen because it has been shown to be reliable, rapid, simple, and inexpensive for routine analysis in developing country settings. • The following optimizations were included: (a) Polycarbonate (Poly) was statistically compared with Polyether sulphone (PES), Nitrocellulose acetate (NA) and Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes; (b) Various housing containers for the membranes were tested: plastic/glass petri-dish, Falcon tubes, Ogreiner cryovials; (c) various solutions was tested to add to the membrane to remove cells from membranes; (d) celite was chosen to bind the DNA because it had a higher DNA binding capacity compared to silicon dioxide; (e) incubation times and rotation speed were tested when adding reagents. • The optimized in-house DNA extraction method was validated with environmental water samples, high (dam water) and low (borehole) bacterial load to determine upper and lower detection limits of the method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8933712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89337122022-03-20 Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water Hoorzook, K.B. Barnard, T.G. MethodsX Method Article • To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as a foundation for extracting Escherichia coli DNA from water. The method combinations i.e., guanidium thiocyanate, celite and home-made spin column were chosen because it has been shown to be reliable, rapid, simple, and inexpensive for routine analysis in developing country settings. • The following optimizations were included: (a) Polycarbonate (Poly) was statistically compared with Polyether sulphone (PES), Nitrocellulose acetate (NA) and Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes; (b) Various housing containers for the membranes were tested: plastic/glass petri-dish, Falcon tubes, Ogreiner cryovials; (c) various solutions was tested to add to the membrane to remove cells from membranes; (d) celite was chosen to bind the DNA because it had a higher DNA binding capacity compared to silicon dioxide; (e) incubation times and rotation speed were tested when adding reagents. • The optimized in-house DNA extraction method was validated with environmental water samples, high (dam water) and low (borehole) bacterial load to determine upper and lower detection limits of the method. Elsevier 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8933712/ /pubmed/35313544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Method Article Hoorzook, K.B. Barnard, T.G. Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title | Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title_full | Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title_fullStr | Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title_full_unstemmed | Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title_short | Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
title_sort | culture independent dna extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water |
topic | Method Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoorzookkb cultureindependentdnaextractionmethodforbacterialcellsconcentratedfromwater AT barnardtg cultureindependentdnaextractionmethodforbacterialcellsconcentratedfromwater |