Cargando…

Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water

• To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoorzook, K.B., Barnard, T.G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653
_version_ 1784671715800907776
author Hoorzook, K.B.
Barnard, T.G.
author_facet Hoorzook, K.B.
Barnard, T.G.
author_sort Hoorzook, K.B.
collection PubMed
description • To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as a foundation for extracting Escherichia coli DNA from water. The method combinations i.e., guanidium thiocyanate, celite and home-made spin column were chosen because it has been shown to be reliable, rapid, simple, and inexpensive for routine analysis in developing country settings. • The following optimizations were included: (a) Polycarbonate (Poly) was statistically compared with Polyether sulphone (PES), Nitrocellulose acetate (NA) and Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes; (b) Various housing containers for the membranes were tested: plastic/glass petri-dish, Falcon tubes, Ogreiner cryovials; (c) various solutions was tested to add to the membrane to remove cells from membranes; (d) celite was chosen to bind the DNA because it had a higher DNA binding capacity compared to silicon dioxide; (e) incubation times and rotation speed were tested when adding reagents. • The optimized in-house DNA extraction method was validated with environmental water samples, high (dam water) and low (borehole) bacterial load to determine upper and lower detection limits of the method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8933712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89337122022-03-20 Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water Hoorzook, K.B. Barnard, T.G. MethodsX Method Article • To bypass the problem of viable but non-culturable bacteria that cannot be isolated by culturable methods would be to isolate DNA from bacterial cells concentrated from water samples used as a template for the polymerase chain reactions (PCR). DNA extraction protocol (Omar et al. 2010) was used as a foundation for extracting Escherichia coli DNA from water. The method combinations i.e., guanidium thiocyanate, celite and home-made spin column were chosen because it has been shown to be reliable, rapid, simple, and inexpensive for routine analysis in developing country settings. • The following optimizations were included: (a) Polycarbonate (Poly) was statistically compared with Polyether sulphone (PES), Nitrocellulose acetate (NA) and Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes; (b) Various housing containers for the membranes were tested: plastic/glass petri-dish, Falcon tubes, Ogreiner cryovials; (c) various solutions was tested to add to the membrane to remove cells from membranes; (d) celite was chosen to bind the DNA because it had a higher DNA binding capacity compared to silicon dioxide; (e) incubation times and rotation speed were tested when adding reagents. • The optimized in-house DNA extraction method was validated with environmental water samples, high (dam water) and low (borehole) bacterial load to determine upper and lower detection limits of the method. Elsevier 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8933712/ /pubmed/35313544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Method Article
Hoorzook, K.B.
Barnard, T.G.
Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title_full Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title_fullStr Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title_full_unstemmed Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title_short Culture independent DNA extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
title_sort culture independent dna extraction method for bacterial cells concentrated from water
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101653
work_keys_str_mv AT hoorzookkb cultureindependentdnaextractionmethodforbacterialcellsconcentratedfromwater
AT barnardtg cultureindependentdnaextractionmethodforbacterialcellsconcentratedfromwater