Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of switching from immediate‐release to prolonged‐release lithium in bipolar patients, poorly tolerant to lithium immediate‐release treatment: A randomized clinical trial

AIM: The effect of switching from lithium immediate release (Li‐IR) to lithium prolonged release (Li‐PR) on lithium‐induced tremor after 1 and 12 weeks of treatment was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, open trial, in bipolar patients from the participating sites with a tremor severity ≥2 (Udv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelacchi, Federica, Dell'Osso, Liliana, Bondi, Emi, Amore, Mario, Fagiolini, Andrea, Iazzetta, Paolo, Pierucci, Daniela, Gorini, Manuela, Quarchioni, Elisa, Comandini, Alessandro, Salvatori, Enrica, Cattaneo, Agnese, Pompili, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2485
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The effect of switching from lithium immediate release (Li‐IR) to lithium prolonged release (Li‐PR) on lithium‐induced tremor after 1 and 12 weeks of treatment was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, open trial, in bipolar patients from the participating sites with a tremor severity ≥2 (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser [UKU] rating scale) despite optimal lithium titration. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the evaluation of tremor by means of the UKU scale after 1 week of treatment. Secondary endpoints included manic Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and depressive symptoms (Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale), a global assessment of the patient's status (Clinical Global Impression), polyuria/polydipsia (UKU item 3.8) and patient‐reported outcomes. RESULTS: Owing to difficulties in including suitable patients the enrollment phase was closed when 73 patients were randomized. Notwithstanding the lower number of patients, in the modified intention‐to‐treat population (n = 70) the primary endpoint was statistically significant: tremor improved after 1 week in 62.9% in Li‐PR group against 20.0% of patients in Li‐IR group (p = .0006; two‐tailed Fisher's exact test). The difference remained statistically significant after 4 (p = .0031) and 12 weeks (p = .0128). The same analysis performed in the PP population confirmed these results. Among the secondary endpoints, only the factor convenience of the treatment satisfaction questionnaire showed a statistically significant difference between groups. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the two formulations. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first comparative documentation of a potential benefit of the prolonged‐release formulation in reducing the symptom tremor, a well‐known adverse effect of lithium therapy. Indeed, the study results should be interpreted taking into account the sample size lower than planned.