Cargando…

Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a cornerstone in enhancing healthcare research and delivery, including clinical guideline development. Health outcomes concern changes in the health status of an individual or population that are attributable to an intervention. Discussion of relev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggane, Alice M., Young, Bridget, Williamson, Paula R., Whittingham, Erin, Cooper, Jessie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6
_version_ 1784671753416474624
author Biggane, Alice M.
Young, Bridget
Williamson, Paula R.
Whittingham, Erin
Cooper, Jessie
author_facet Biggane, Alice M.
Young, Bridget
Williamson, Paula R.
Whittingham, Erin
Cooper, Jessie
author_sort Biggane, Alice M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a cornerstone in enhancing healthcare research and delivery, including clinical guideline development. Health outcomes concern changes in the health status of an individual or population that are attributable to an intervention. Discussion of relevant health outcomes impacts the resulting clinical guidelines for practice. This study explores how the input of PPI contributors at the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is integrated into guideline development, particularly in relation to health outcome selection. METHODS: The study used an ethnographic methodological approach. Data comprised: observations of committee meetings, scoping workshops and training sessions, and in-depth interviews with PPI contributors, health professionals and chairs from clinical guideline development committees. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: PPI contributors’ input in the guideline development process was often of limited scope, particularly in selecting health outcomes. Key constraints on their input included: the technical content and language of guidelines, assumed differences in the health-related priorities between PPI contributors and health professionals, and the linear timeline of the guideline development process. However, PPI contributors can influence clinical guideline development including the selection of relevant health outcomes. This was achieved through several factors and highlights the important role of the committee chair, the importance of training and support for all committee members, the use of plain language and the opportunity for all committee members to engage. CONCLUSIONS: Lay member input during the outcome selection phase of clinical guideline development is achievable, but there are challenges to overcome. Study findings identify ways that future guideline developers can support meaningful lay involvement in guideline development and health outcome selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8933885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89338852022-03-23 Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study Biggane, Alice M. Young, Bridget Williamson, Paula R. Whittingham, Erin Cooper, Jessie BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a cornerstone in enhancing healthcare research and delivery, including clinical guideline development. Health outcomes concern changes in the health status of an individual or population that are attributable to an intervention. Discussion of relevant health outcomes impacts the resulting clinical guidelines for practice. This study explores how the input of PPI contributors at the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is integrated into guideline development, particularly in relation to health outcome selection. METHODS: The study used an ethnographic methodological approach. Data comprised: observations of committee meetings, scoping workshops and training sessions, and in-depth interviews with PPI contributors, health professionals and chairs from clinical guideline development committees. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: PPI contributors’ input in the guideline development process was often of limited scope, particularly in selecting health outcomes. Key constraints on their input included: the technical content and language of guidelines, assumed differences in the health-related priorities between PPI contributors and health professionals, and the linear timeline of the guideline development process. However, PPI contributors can influence clinical guideline development including the selection of relevant health outcomes. This was achieved through several factors and highlights the important role of the committee chair, the importance of training and support for all committee members, the use of plain language and the opportunity for all committee members to engage. CONCLUSIONS: Lay member input during the outcome selection phase of clinical guideline development is achievable, but there are challenges to overcome. Study findings identify ways that future guideline developers can support meaningful lay involvement in guideline development and health outcome selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6. BioMed Central 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8933885/ /pubmed/35303872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Biggane, Alice M.
Young, Bridget
Williamson, Paula R.
Whittingham, Erin
Cooper, Jessie
Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title_full Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title_fullStr Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title_short Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
title_sort enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8933885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bigganealicem enhancingpatientandpubliccontributioninhealthoutcomeselectionduringclinicalguidelinedevelopmentanethnographicstudy
AT youngbridget enhancingpatientandpubliccontributioninhealthoutcomeselectionduringclinicalguidelinedevelopmentanethnographicstudy
AT williamsonpaular enhancingpatientandpubliccontributioninhealthoutcomeselectionduringclinicalguidelinedevelopmentanethnographicstudy
AT whittinghamerin enhancingpatientandpubliccontributioninhealthoutcomeselectionduringclinicalguidelinedevelopmentanethnographicstudy
AT cooperjessie enhancingpatientandpubliccontributioninhealthoutcomeselectionduringclinicalguidelinedevelopmentanethnographicstudy