Cargando…
Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Legionellosis remains a public health problem. The most common diagnostic method to detect Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is culture. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a fast and accurate method for this detection in environmental samples. METHODS: Four databases were searched...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00503-9 |
_version_ | 1784671778888482816 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Xin Chen, Ying-Zhou Ye, Qi-Qing Liao, Li-Juan Cai, Zhuo-Rui Lin, Min Li, Jia-Na Zhang, Geng-Biao Peng, Xiao-Li Shi, Wen-Fang Guo, Xu-Guang |
author_facet | Yin, Xin Chen, Ying-Zhou Ye, Qi-Qing Liao, Li-Juan Cai, Zhuo-Rui Lin, Min Li, Jia-Na Zhang, Geng-Biao Peng, Xiao-Li Shi, Wen-Fang Guo, Xu-Guang |
author_sort | Yin, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Legionellosis remains a public health problem. The most common diagnostic method to detect Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is culture. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a fast and accurate method for this detection in environmental samples. METHODS: Four databases were searched for studies that evaluated the detection efficiency of PCR in L. pneumophila. The quality evaluation was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. We used Meta-DiSc 1.4 software and the Stata 15.0 software to create forest plots, a meta-regression, a bivariate boxplot and a Deeks’ funnel plot. RESULTS: A total of 18 four-fold tables from 16 studies were analysed. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCR was 94% and 72%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (RLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 2.73 and 0.12, respectively. The result of the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 22.85 and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.7884. CONCLUSION: Establishing a laboratory diagnostic tool for L. pneumophila detection is important for epidemiological studies. In this work, PCR demonstrated a promising diagnostic accuracy for L. pneumophila. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00503-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8934000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89340002022-03-23 Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yin, Xin Chen, Ying-Zhou Ye, Qi-Qing Liao, Li-Juan Cai, Zhuo-Rui Lin, Min Li, Jia-Na Zhang, Geng-Biao Peng, Xiao-Li Shi, Wen-Fang Guo, Xu-Guang Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Review BACKGROUND: Legionellosis remains a public health problem. The most common diagnostic method to detect Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) is culture. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a fast and accurate method for this detection in environmental samples. METHODS: Four databases were searched for studies that evaluated the detection efficiency of PCR in L. pneumophila. The quality evaluation was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. We used Meta-DiSc 1.4 software and the Stata 15.0 software to create forest plots, a meta-regression, a bivariate boxplot and a Deeks’ funnel plot. RESULTS: A total of 18 four-fold tables from 16 studies were analysed. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCR was 94% and 72%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (RLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 2.73 and 0.12, respectively. The result of the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 22.85 and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.7884. CONCLUSION: Establishing a laboratory diagnostic tool for L. pneumophila detection is important for epidemiological studies. In this work, PCR demonstrated a promising diagnostic accuracy for L. pneumophila. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00503-9. BioMed Central 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8934000/ /pubmed/35303873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00503-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Yin, Xin Chen, Ying-Zhou Ye, Qi-Qing Liao, Li-Juan Cai, Zhuo-Rui Lin, Min Li, Jia-Na Zhang, Geng-Biao Peng, Xiao-Li Shi, Wen-Fang Guo, Xu-Guang Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Detection performance of PCR for Legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | detection performance of pcr for legionella pneumophila in environmental samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00503-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinxin detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyingzhou detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yeqiqing detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liaolijuan detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caizhuorui detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linmin detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijiana detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanggengbiao detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pengxiaoli detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shiwenfang detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guoxuguang detectionperformanceofpcrforlegionellapneumophilainenvironmentalsamplesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |