Cargando…

Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures

BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere, Habatmu, Kassahun, Derese, Andualem, Gouse, Hetta, Lawrie, Stephen M., Cella, Matteo, Alem, Atalay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x
_version_ 1784671824630513664
author Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere
Habatmu, Kassahun
Derese, Andualem
Gouse, Hetta
Lawrie, Stephen M.
Cella, Matteo
Alem, Atalay
author_facet Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere
Habatmu, Kassahun
Derese, Andualem
Gouse, Hetta
Lawrie, Stephen M.
Cella, Matteo
Alem, Atalay
author_sort Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the psychometric properties of cognitive measures validated in people with SMDs in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching from four electronic databases. Two authors independently screened studies for their eligibility. Measurement properties of measures in all included studies were extracted. All eligible measures were assessed against criteria set for clinical and research recommendations. Results are summarized narratively and measures were grouped by measurement type and population. RESULTS: We identified 23 unique measures from 28 studies. None of these was from low-income settings. Seventeen of the measures were performance-based. The majority (n = 16/23) of the measures were validated in people with schizophrenia. The most commonly reported measurement properties were: known group, convergent, and divergent validity (n = 25/28). For most psychometric property, studies of methodological qualities were found to be doubtful. Among measures evaluated in people with schizophrenia, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cognitive Assessment Interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and CogState Schizophrenia Battery were with the highest scores for clinical and research recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in our review provide only limited quality evidence and future studies should consider adapting and validating measures using stronger designs and methods. Nonetheless, validated assessments of cognition could help in the management and allocating therapy in people with SMDs in LMICs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8934327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89343272022-04-01 Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Habatmu, Kassahun Derese, Andualem Gouse, Hetta Lawrie, Stephen M. Cella, Matteo Alem, Atalay Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Review BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the psychometric properties of cognitive measures validated in people with SMDs in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching from four electronic databases. Two authors independently screened studies for their eligibility. Measurement properties of measures in all included studies were extracted. All eligible measures were assessed against criteria set for clinical and research recommendations. Results are summarized narratively and measures were grouped by measurement type and population. RESULTS: We identified 23 unique measures from 28 studies. None of these was from low-income settings. Seventeen of the measures were performance-based. The majority (n = 16/23) of the measures were validated in people with schizophrenia. The most commonly reported measurement properties were: known group, convergent, and divergent validity (n = 25/28). For most psychometric property, studies of methodological qualities were found to be doubtful. Among measures evaluated in people with schizophrenia, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cognitive Assessment Interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and CogState Schizophrenia Battery were with the highest scores for clinical and research recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in our review provide only limited quality evidence and future studies should consider adapting and validating measures using stronger designs and methods. Nonetheless, validated assessments of cognition could help in the management and allocating therapy in people with SMDs in LMICs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8934327/ /pubmed/34145463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere
Habatmu, Kassahun
Derese, Andualem
Gouse, Hetta
Lawrie, Stephen M.
Cella, Matteo
Alem, Atalay
Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title_full Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title_fullStr Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title_full_unstemmed Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title_short Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
title_sort assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x
work_keys_str_mv AT haileyohannesgebreegziabhere assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT habatmukassahun assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT dereseandualem assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT gousehetta assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT lawriestephenm assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT cellamatteo assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures
AT alematalay assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures