Cargando…
Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures
BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). O...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x |
_version_ | 1784671824630513664 |
---|---|
author | Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Habatmu, Kassahun Derese, Andualem Gouse, Hetta Lawrie, Stephen M. Cella, Matteo Alem, Atalay |
author_facet | Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Habatmu, Kassahun Derese, Andualem Gouse, Hetta Lawrie, Stephen M. Cella, Matteo Alem, Atalay |
author_sort | Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the psychometric properties of cognitive measures validated in people with SMDs in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching from four electronic databases. Two authors independently screened studies for their eligibility. Measurement properties of measures in all included studies were extracted. All eligible measures were assessed against criteria set for clinical and research recommendations. Results are summarized narratively and measures were grouped by measurement type and population. RESULTS: We identified 23 unique measures from 28 studies. None of these was from low-income settings. Seventeen of the measures were performance-based. The majority (n = 16/23) of the measures were validated in people with schizophrenia. The most commonly reported measurement properties were: known group, convergent, and divergent validity (n = 25/28). For most psychometric property, studies of methodological qualities were found to be doubtful. Among measures evaluated in people with schizophrenia, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cognitive Assessment Interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and CogState Schizophrenia Battery were with the highest scores for clinical and research recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in our review provide only limited quality evidence and future studies should consider adapting and validating measures using stronger designs and methods. Nonetheless, validated assessments of cognition could help in the management and allocating therapy in people with SMDs in LMICs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8934327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89343272022-04-01 Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Habatmu, Kassahun Derese, Andualem Gouse, Hetta Lawrie, Stephen M. Cella, Matteo Alem, Atalay Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Review BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the psychometric properties of cognitive measures validated in people with SMDs in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching from four electronic databases. Two authors independently screened studies for their eligibility. Measurement properties of measures in all included studies were extracted. All eligible measures were assessed against criteria set for clinical and research recommendations. Results are summarized narratively and measures were grouped by measurement type and population. RESULTS: We identified 23 unique measures from 28 studies. None of these was from low-income settings. Seventeen of the measures were performance-based. The majority (n = 16/23) of the measures were validated in people with schizophrenia. The most commonly reported measurement properties were: known group, convergent, and divergent validity (n = 25/28). For most psychometric property, studies of methodological qualities were found to be doubtful. Among measures evaluated in people with schizophrenia, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cognitive Assessment Interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and CogState Schizophrenia Battery were with the highest scores for clinical and research recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in our review provide only limited quality evidence and future studies should consider adapting and validating measures using stronger designs and methods. Nonetheless, validated assessments of cognition could help in the management and allocating therapy in people with SMDs in LMICs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8934327/ /pubmed/34145463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Haile, Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Habatmu, Kassahun Derese, Andualem Gouse, Hetta Lawrie, Stephen M. Cella, Matteo Alem, Atalay Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title | Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title_full | Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title_fullStr | Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title_short | Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
title_sort | assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02120-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haileyohannesgebreegziabhere assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT habatmukassahun assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT dereseandualem assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT gousehetta assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT lawriestephenm assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT cellamatteo assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures AT alematalay assessingcognitioninpeoplewithseverementaldisordersinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofassessmentmeasures |