Cargando…

Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the effects of a novel dual-bearing shoulder prosthesis and a conventional reverse shoulder prosthesis on the deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces for four different arm motions. The dual-bearing prosthesis is a glenoid-sparing joint replacement with a moving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weisse, Bernhard, Lama, Susan, Piskoty, Gabor, Affolter, Christian, Aiyangar, Ameet K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-00988-7
_version_ 1784671860939554816
author Weisse, Bernhard
Lama, Susan
Piskoty, Gabor
Affolter, Christian
Aiyangar, Ameet K.
author_facet Weisse, Bernhard
Lama, Susan
Piskoty, Gabor
Affolter, Christian
Aiyangar, Ameet K.
author_sort Weisse, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the effects of a novel dual-bearing shoulder prosthesis and a conventional reverse shoulder prosthesis on the deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces for four different arm motions. The dual-bearing prosthesis is a glenoid-sparing joint replacement with a moving center of rotation. It has been developed to treat rotator cuff arthropathy, providing an increased post-operative functionality. METHODS: A three-dimensional musculoskeletal OpenSim® model of an upper body, incorporating a natural gleno-humeral joint and a scapula-thoracic joint developed by Blana et al. (J Biomech 41: 1714-1721, 2008), was used as a reference for the natural shoulder. It was modified by integrating first a novel dual-bearing prosthesis, and second, a reverse shoulder prosthesis into the shoulder joint complex. Four different arm motions, namely abduction, scaption, internal and external rotation, were simulated using an inverse kinematics approach. For each of the three models, shoulder muscle forces and joint reaction forces were calculated with a 2 kg weight in the hand. RESULTS: In general, the maximal shoulder muscle force and joint reaction force values were in a similar range for both prosthesis models during all four motions. The maximal deltoid muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis were 18% lower for abduction and 3% higher for scaption compared to the natural shoulder. The maximal rotator cuff muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis were 36% lower for abduction and 1% higher for scaption compared to the natural shoulder. Although the maximal deltoid muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis in internal and external rotation were 52% and 64% higher, respectively, compared to the natural shoulder, the maximal rotator cuff muscle forces were 27% lower in both motions. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the dual-bearing shoulder prosthesis is a feasible option for patients with rotator cuff tear and has a strong potential to be used as secondary as well as primary joint replacement. The study also demonstrates that computer simulations can help to guide the continued optimization of this particular design concept for successful clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8934495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89344952022-03-23 Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions Weisse, Bernhard Lama, Susan Piskoty, Gabor Affolter, Christian Aiyangar, Ameet K. Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the effects of a novel dual-bearing shoulder prosthesis and a conventional reverse shoulder prosthesis on the deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces for four different arm motions. The dual-bearing prosthesis is a glenoid-sparing joint replacement with a moving center of rotation. It has been developed to treat rotator cuff arthropathy, providing an increased post-operative functionality. METHODS: A three-dimensional musculoskeletal OpenSim® model of an upper body, incorporating a natural gleno-humeral joint and a scapula-thoracic joint developed by Blana et al. (J Biomech 41: 1714-1721, 2008), was used as a reference for the natural shoulder. It was modified by integrating first a novel dual-bearing prosthesis, and second, a reverse shoulder prosthesis into the shoulder joint complex. Four different arm motions, namely abduction, scaption, internal and external rotation, were simulated using an inverse kinematics approach. For each of the three models, shoulder muscle forces and joint reaction forces were calculated with a 2 kg weight in the hand. RESULTS: In general, the maximal shoulder muscle force and joint reaction force values were in a similar range for both prosthesis models during all four motions. The maximal deltoid muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis were 18% lower for abduction and 3% higher for scaption compared to the natural shoulder. The maximal rotator cuff muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis were 36% lower for abduction and 1% higher for scaption compared to the natural shoulder. Although the maximal deltoid muscle forces in the model with the dual-bearing prosthesis in internal and external rotation were 52% and 64% higher, respectively, compared to the natural shoulder, the maximal rotator cuff muscle forces were 27% lower in both motions. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the dual-bearing shoulder prosthesis is a feasible option for patients with rotator cuff tear and has a strong potential to be used as secondary as well as primary joint replacement. The study also demonstrates that computer simulations can help to guide the continued optimization of this particular design concept for successful clinical outcomes. BioMed Central 2022-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8934495/ /pubmed/35305644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-00988-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Weisse, Bernhard
Lama, Susan
Piskoty, Gabor
Affolter, Christian
Aiyangar, Ameet K.
Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title_full Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title_fullStr Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title_full_unstemmed Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title_short Effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
title_sort effect of two types of shoulder prosthesis on the muscle forces using a generic multibody model for different arm motions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-00988-7
work_keys_str_mv AT weissebernhard effectoftwotypesofshoulderprosthesisonthemuscleforcesusingagenericmultibodymodelfordifferentarmmotions
AT lamasusan effectoftwotypesofshoulderprosthesisonthemuscleforcesusingagenericmultibodymodelfordifferentarmmotions
AT piskotygabor effectoftwotypesofshoulderprosthesisonthemuscleforcesusingagenericmultibodymodelfordifferentarmmotions
AT affolterchristian effectoftwotypesofshoulderprosthesisonthemuscleforcesusingagenericmultibodymodelfordifferentarmmotions
AT aiyangarameetk effectoftwotypesofshoulderprosthesisonthemuscleforcesusingagenericmultibodymodelfordifferentarmmotions