Cargando…

Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Progress achieved by long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against malaria is threatened by widespread selection of pyrethroid resistance among vector populations. LLINs with non-pyrethroid insecticides are urgently needed. This study aims to assess the insecticide and textile durabilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jackline L., Messenger, Louisa A., Mosha, Franklin W., Lukole, Eliud, Mosha, Jacklin F., Kulkarni, Manisha, Churcher, Thomas S., Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Manjurano, Alphaxard, Protopopoff, Natacha, Rowland, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04119-4
_version_ 1784671861647343616
author Martin, Jackline L.
Messenger, Louisa A.
Mosha, Franklin W.
Lukole, Eliud
Mosha, Jacklin F.
Kulkarni, Manisha
Churcher, Thomas S.
Sherrard-Smith, Ellie
Manjurano, Alphaxard
Protopopoff, Natacha
Rowland, Mark
author_facet Martin, Jackline L.
Messenger, Louisa A.
Mosha, Franklin W.
Lukole, Eliud
Mosha, Jacklin F.
Kulkarni, Manisha
Churcher, Thomas S.
Sherrard-Smith, Ellie
Manjurano, Alphaxard
Protopopoff, Natacha
Rowland, Mark
author_sort Martin, Jackline L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Progress achieved by long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against malaria is threatened by widespread selection of pyrethroid resistance among vector populations. LLINs with non-pyrethroid insecticides are urgently needed. This study aims to assess the insecticide and textile durability of three classes of dual-active ingredient (A.I.) LLINs using techniques derived from established WHO LLIN testing methods to set new standards of evaluation. METHODS: A WHO Phase 3 active ingredients and textile durability study will be carried out within a cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 clusters in Misungwi district, Tanzania. The following treatments will be evaluated: (1) Interceptor(®)G2 combining chlorfenapyr and the pyrethroid alpha-cypermethrin, (2) Royal Guard(®) treated with pyriproxyfen and alpha-cypermethrin, (3) Olyset™ Plus which incorporates a synergist piperonyl butoxide and the pyrethroid permethrin, and (4) a reference standard alpha-cypermethrin only LLIN (Interceptor(®)). 750 nets will be followed in 5 clusters per intervention arm at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post distribution for survivorship and hole index assessment. A second cohort of 1950 nets per net type will be identified in 10 clusters, of which 30 LLINs will be withdrawn for bio-efficacy and chemical analysis every 6 months up to 36 months and another 30 collected for experimental hut trials every year. Bio-efficacy will be assessed using cone bioassays and tunnel tests against susceptible and resistant laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Efficacy of field-collected nets will be compared in six experimental huts. The main outcomes will be Anopheles mortality up to 72 h post exposure, blood feeding and egg maturation using ovary dissection to assess impact on fecundity. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings will help develop bio-efficacy and physical durability criteria for partner A.I., in relation to the cRCT epidemiological and entomological outcomes, and refine preferred product characteristics of each class of LLIN. If suitable, the bioassay and hut outcomes will be fitted to transmission models to estimate correlation with cRCT outcomes. Trial registration number: NCT03554616. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04119-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8934498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89344982022-03-23 Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial Martin, Jackline L. Messenger, Louisa A. Mosha, Franklin W. Lukole, Eliud Mosha, Jacklin F. Kulkarni, Manisha Churcher, Thomas S. Sherrard-Smith, Ellie Manjurano, Alphaxard Protopopoff, Natacha Rowland, Mark Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Progress achieved by long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) against malaria is threatened by widespread selection of pyrethroid resistance among vector populations. LLINs with non-pyrethroid insecticides are urgently needed. This study aims to assess the insecticide and textile durability of three classes of dual-active ingredient (A.I.) LLINs using techniques derived from established WHO LLIN testing methods to set new standards of evaluation. METHODS: A WHO Phase 3 active ingredients and textile durability study will be carried out within a cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 clusters in Misungwi district, Tanzania. The following treatments will be evaluated: (1) Interceptor(®)G2 combining chlorfenapyr and the pyrethroid alpha-cypermethrin, (2) Royal Guard(®) treated with pyriproxyfen and alpha-cypermethrin, (3) Olyset™ Plus which incorporates a synergist piperonyl butoxide and the pyrethroid permethrin, and (4) a reference standard alpha-cypermethrin only LLIN (Interceptor(®)). 750 nets will be followed in 5 clusters per intervention arm at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post distribution for survivorship and hole index assessment. A second cohort of 1950 nets per net type will be identified in 10 clusters, of which 30 LLINs will be withdrawn for bio-efficacy and chemical analysis every 6 months up to 36 months and another 30 collected for experimental hut trials every year. Bio-efficacy will be assessed using cone bioassays and tunnel tests against susceptible and resistant laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Efficacy of field-collected nets will be compared in six experimental huts. The main outcomes will be Anopheles mortality up to 72 h post exposure, blood feeding and egg maturation using ovary dissection to assess impact on fecundity. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings will help develop bio-efficacy and physical durability criteria for partner A.I., in relation to the cRCT epidemiological and entomological outcomes, and refine preferred product characteristics of each class of LLIN. If suitable, the bioassay and hut outcomes will be fitted to transmission models to estimate correlation with cRCT outcomes. Trial registration number: NCT03554616. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04119-4. BioMed Central 2022-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8934498/ /pubmed/35305667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04119-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Martin, Jackline L.
Messenger, Louisa A.
Mosha, Franklin W.
Lukole, Eliud
Mosha, Jacklin F.
Kulkarni, Manisha
Churcher, Thomas S.
Sherrard-Smith, Ellie
Manjurano, Alphaxard
Protopopoff, Natacha
Rowland, Mark
Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_short Durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only LLIN in Tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
title_sort durability of three types of dual active ingredient long-lasting insecticidal net compared to a pyrethroid-only llin in tanzania: methodology for a prospective cohort study nested in a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04119-4
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjacklinel durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT messengerlouisaa durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moshafranklinw durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lukoleeliud durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moshajacklinf durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kulkarnimanisha durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT churcherthomass durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sherrardsmithellie durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT manjuranoalphaxard durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT protopopoffnatacha durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rowlandmark durabilityofthreetypesofdualactiveingredientlonglastinginsecticidalnetcomparedtoapyrethroidonlyllinintanzaniamethodologyforaprospectivecohortstudynestedinaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial