Cargando…

Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas

PURPOSE: To determine if visual acuity (VA) outcomes are comparable using the amblyopia treatment study HOTV protocol (ATS-HOTV) and electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) protocol in children with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs). METHODS: Children enrolled in a prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avery, Robert A., Go, Cammille, Fisher, Michael J., Liu, Grant T., Garcia, Arielle, Richter, Meg, McGeehan, Brendan, Quinn, Graham E., Ying, Gui-Shuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35262649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.3.10
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine if visual acuity (VA) outcomes are comparable using the amblyopia treatment study HOTV protocol (ATS-HOTV) and electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) protocol in children with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs). METHODS: Children enrolled in a prospective study of OPGs were eligible if they completed both the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS during the same visit. The contribution of age, testing order, having neurofibromatosis type 1, visual field loss, and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness to VA difference were assessed using generalized estimating equations to account for the intereye correlation. RESULTS: Forty-eight children (median age, 10.3 years; range, 5.2–17.1 years; 49% female) met inclusion criteria and contributed 93 study eyes at their initial visit. Eleven patients (22 eyes) had more than one study visit, permitting longitudinal evaluation. ATS-HOTV measures of VA were higher than E-ETDRS at the initial (0.13 ± 0.36 vs. 0.23 ± 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], P < 0.001) and all visits (0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.21 ± 0.36 logMAR, P < 0.001). VA remained significantly higher with ATS-HOTV regardless of test order, but the mean difference between tests was most profound when tested with ATS-HOTV first compared to E-ETDRS first (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VA results differ significantly between the ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS testing methods in children with OPGs. Given the wide range of ages and testing ability of children, one VA testing method should be used throughout longitudinal OPG clinical trials. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: It is imperative that age-appropriate VA testing methods are standardized across all pediatric OPG clinical trials.