Cargando…

Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effects of different suturing techniques in perforating keratoplasty surgery, in order to identify the most effective in reducing post-operative astigmatism. METHODS: We analysed data from patients who underwent penetrating keratop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuzzi, Raffaele, Burato, Claudio, Tridico, Federico, Nuzzi, Alessia, Caselgrandi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321045
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S355538
_version_ 1784671923666419712
author Nuzzi, Raffaele
Burato, Claudio
Tridico, Federico
Nuzzi, Alessia
Caselgrandi, Paolo
author_facet Nuzzi, Raffaele
Burato, Claudio
Tridico, Federico
Nuzzi, Alessia
Caselgrandi, Paolo
author_sort Nuzzi, Raffaele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effects of different suturing techniques in perforating keratoplasty surgery, in order to identify the most effective in reducing post-operative astigmatism. METHODS: We analysed data from patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for different indications. All interventions were performed by the same surgeon. Patients were subjected to a follow-up of at least 12 months after surgery, during which astigmatism (assessed by keratometry, topography and refraction) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and complications were evaluated. A total of 100 eyes from 100 patients were included and were randomly assigned to five different groups, each one featuring a different suturing technique: interrupted (INT), single running (SRS), double running with two 10–0 sutures (DRS), double running antitorque with two 10–0 sutures (DRSa), double running with both 10–0 and 11–0 sutures (DRS with 11–0). RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in astigmatism after surgery between the double running sutures groups and the others with different techniques. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the INT and the SRS group; moreover, there is no statistically significant difference between the different groups with double running sutures (DRS, DRSa, DRS with 11–0). There is no statistically significant difference in BCVA values among the five groups. The wound leak rate was 10% in the INT group, 5.3% in the SRS group and 0% in all groups with double running sutures. CONCLUSION: In penetrating keratoplasty surgery, the double running suture technique reduces postoperative astigmatism, provides faster visual rehabilitation and features lower complication rates when compared to techniques featuring single running and interrupted sutures. No significant difference in terms of postoperative astigmatism or complication rates was observed among patients receiving double running suture techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8934865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89348652022-03-22 Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty Nuzzi, Raffaele Burato, Claudio Tridico, Federico Nuzzi, Alessia Caselgrandi, Paolo Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effects of different suturing techniques in perforating keratoplasty surgery, in order to identify the most effective in reducing post-operative astigmatism. METHODS: We analysed data from patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for different indications. All interventions were performed by the same surgeon. Patients were subjected to a follow-up of at least 12 months after surgery, during which astigmatism (assessed by keratometry, topography and refraction) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and complications were evaluated. A total of 100 eyes from 100 patients were included and were randomly assigned to five different groups, each one featuring a different suturing technique: interrupted (INT), single running (SRS), double running with two 10–0 sutures (DRS), double running antitorque with two 10–0 sutures (DRSa), double running with both 10–0 and 11–0 sutures (DRS with 11–0). RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in astigmatism after surgery between the double running sutures groups and the others with different techniques. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the INT and the SRS group; moreover, there is no statistically significant difference between the different groups with double running sutures (DRS, DRSa, DRS with 11–0). There is no statistically significant difference in BCVA values among the five groups. The wound leak rate was 10% in the INT group, 5.3% in the SRS group and 0% in all groups with double running sutures. CONCLUSION: In penetrating keratoplasty surgery, the double running suture technique reduces postoperative astigmatism, provides faster visual rehabilitation and features lower complication rates when compared to techniques featuring single running and interrupted sutures. No significant difference in terms of postoperative astigmatism or complication rates was observed among patients receiving double running suture techniques. Dove 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8934865/ /pubmed/35321045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S355538 Text en © 2022 Nuzzi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nuzzi, Raffaele
Burato, Claudio
Tridico, Federico
Nuzzi, Alessia
Caselgrandi, Paolo
Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_full Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_fullStr Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_short Advantages of Double Running Sutures in Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_sort advantages of double running sutures in astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321045
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S355538
work_keys_str_mv AT nuzziraffaele advantagesofdoublerunningsuturesinastigmatismafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT buratoclaudio advantagesofdoublerunningsuturesinastigmatismafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT tridicofederico advantagesofdoublerunningsuturesinastigmatismafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT nuzzialessia advantagesofdoublerunningsuturesinastigmatismafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT caselgrandipaolo advantagesofdoublerunningsuturesinastigmatismafterpenetratingkeratoplasty