Cargando…

Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS: Not all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit equally from beta‐blockers. Previous studies suggest that myocardial strain that reflects myocardial deformation may have a better prognostic value than the left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Chan Soon, Park, Jin Joo, Hwang, In‐Chang, Park, Jun‐Bean, Park, Jae‐Hyeong, Cho, Goo‐Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13800
_version_ 1784671940320952320
author Park, Chan Soon
Park, Jin Joo
Hwang, In‐Chang
Park, Jun‐Bean
Park, Jae‐Hyeong
Cho, Goo‐Yeong
author_facet Park, Chan Soon
Park, Jin Joo
Hwang, In‐Chang
Park, Jun‐Bean
Park, Jae‐Hyeong
Cho, Goo‐Yeong
author_sort Park, Chan Soon
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Not all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit equally from beta‐blockers. Previous studies suggest that myocardial strain that reflects myocardial deformation may have a better prognostic value than the left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to evaluate the differential effect of beta‐blockers according to the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 4312 patients in the Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Acute Heart Failure registry, we included 2126 HFrEF patients whose data on beta‐blocker use and GLS were available. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group of patients had GLS ≥ 10%, and the other group had GLS < 10%. The primary outcome was 5 year all‐cause mortality according to beta‐blocker use. Of the 2126 patients with HFrEF, 526 (24.7%) and 1600 (75.3%) patients had GLS ≥ 10% and <10%, respectively. Overall, 1399 patients (65.8%) received beta‐blockers, and 864 (40.6%) patients died during the 5 year follow‐up. Beta‐blocker use was associated with improved survival in patients with GLS < 10% in both the inverse probability treatment‐weighted (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.83, P < 0.001) and Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.81; P < 0.001). However, beta‐blocker use was not associated with better survival in patients with GLS ≥ 10% in the inverse probability treatment‐weighted and Cox regression analyses (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Beta‐blocker use appears to be associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and GLS < 10%, but this is not the case in patients with GLS ≥ 10%. Therefore, GLS may be used to identify patients who have attenuated benefits from beta‐blockers in HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03513653 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513653).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8934950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89349502022-03-24 Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Park, Chan Soon Park, Jin Joo Hwang, In‐Chang Park, Jun‐Bean Park, Jae‐Hyeong Cho, Goo‐Yeong ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Not all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit equally from beta‐blockers. Previous studies suggest that myocardial strain that reflects myocardial deformation may have a better prognostic value than the left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to evaluate the differential effect of beta‐blockers according to the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 4312 patients in the Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Acute Heart Failure registry, we included 2126 HFrEF patients whose data on beta‐blocker use and GLS were available. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group of patients had GLS ≥ 10%, and the other group had GLS < 10%. The primary outcome was 5 year all‐cause mortality according to beta‐blocker use. Of the 2126 patients with HFrEF, 526 (24.7%) and 1600 (75.3%) patients had GLS ≥ 10% and <10%, respectively. Overall, 1399 patients (65.8%) received beta‐blockers, and 864 (40.6%) patients died during the 5 year follow‐up. Beta‐blocker use was associated with improved survival in patients with GLS < 10% in both the inverse probability treatment‐weighted (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.83, P < 0.001) and Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.81; P < 0.001). However, beta‐blocker use was not associated with better survival in patients with GLS ≥ 10% in the inverse probability treatment‐weighted and Cox regression analyses (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Beta‐blocker use appears to be associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and GLS < 10%, but this is not the case in patients with GLS ≥ 10%. Therefore, GLS may be used to identify patients who have attenuated benefits from beta‐blockers in HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03513653 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513653). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8934950/ /pubmed/35001562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13800 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Park, Chan Soon
Park, Jin Joo
Hwang, In‐Chang
Park, Jun‐Bean
Park, Jae‐Hyeong
Cho, Goo‐Yeong
Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_short Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_sort myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta‐blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13800
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchansoon myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT parkjinjoo myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT hwanginchang myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT parkjunbean myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT parkjaehyeong myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT chogooyeong myocardialstraintoidentifybenefitfrombetablockersinpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction