Cargando…
Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure
AIMS: Recent trials have evaluated sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to assess the robustness of findings from these trials using the fragility index (FI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fragility index is defined as the minimum number of patients that m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13785 |
_version_ | 1784671950680883200 |
---|---|
author | Usman, Muhammad Shariq Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb Fonarow, Gregg C. Greene, Stephen J. Friede, Tim Vaduganathan, Muthiah Filippatos, Gerasimos Coats, Andrew J. Stewart Anker, Stefan D. Butler, Javed |
author_facet | Usman, Muhammad Shariq Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb Fonarow, Gregg C. Greene, Stephen J. Friede, Tim Vaduganathan, Muthiah Filippatos, Gerasimos Coats, Andrew J. Stewart Anker, Stefan D. Butler, Javed |
author_sort | Usman, Muhammad Shariq |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Recent trials have evaluated sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to assess the robustness of findings from these trials using the fragility index (FI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fragility index is defined as the minimum number of patients that must be moved from the ‘non‐event’ to the ‘event’ group to turn a statistically significant result to non‐significant. In addition to FI, fragility quotient [(FQ); FI divided by the sample size] was calculated to assess the proportion of events that must be moved to change the significance. For statistically non‐significant outcomes, reverse fragility index (RFI) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) were calculated. Robustness of findings after pooling data from all three trials was also assessed. A robust reduction in first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was seen with dapagliflozin (FI = 62 and FQ = 0.013), empagliflozin (FI = 50 and FQ = 0.013), and sotagliflozin (FI = 60 and FQ = 0.049). Dapagliflozin nominally improved all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, with modest FI (n = 8 and 5) and FQ (0.002 and 0.001). Empagliflozin and sotagliflozin did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in all‐cause mortality, with modest RFI (empagliflozin: RFI = 26 and RFQ = 0.007; sotagliflozin: RFI = 6 and RFQ = 0.005). A similar trend was seen with cardiovascular mortality (empagliflozin: RFI = 24 and RFQ = 0.006; sotagliflozin: RFI = 7 and RFQ = 0.006). Upon meta‐analysis, the result for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was robust (FI = 95 and FQ = 0.010). The reductions in all‐cause (FI = 12 and FQ = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (FI = 9 and FQ = 0.001), while statistically significant, were fragile. CONCLUSION: Improvement in the composite outcome of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death was highly concordant and robust across sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor trials. In contrast, secondary endpoints of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality were statistically fragile, underscoring the need to power trials for mortality to fully understand the benefit of therapies on fatal events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8934993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89349932022-03-24 Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure Usman, Muhammad Shariq Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb Fonarow, Gregg C. Greene, Stephen J. Friede, Tim Vaduganathan, Muthiah Filippatos, Gerasimos Coats, Andrew J. Stewart Anker, Stefan D. Butler, Javed ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Recent trials have evaluated sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to assess the robustness of findings from these trials using the fragility index (FI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fragility index is defined as the minimum number of patients that must be moved from the ‘non‐event’ to the ‘event’ group to turn a statistically significant result to non‐significant. In addition to FI, fragility quotient [(FQ); FI divided by the sample size] was calculated to assess the proportion of events that must be moved to change the significance. For statistically non‐significant outcomes, reverse fragility index (RFI) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) were calculated. Robustness of findings after pooling data from all three trials was also assessed. A robust reduction in first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was seen with dapagliflozin (FI = 62 and FQ = 0.013), empagliflozin (FI = 50 and FQ = 0.013), and sotagliflozin (FI = 60 and FQ = 0.049). Dapagliflozin nominally improved all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality, with modest FI (n = 8 and 5) and FQ (0.002 and 0.001). Empagliflozin and sotagliflozin did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in all‐cause mortality, with modest RFI (empagliflozin: RFI = 26 and RFQ = 0.007; sotagliflozin: RFI = 6 and RFQ = 0.005). A similar trend was seen with cardiovascular mortality (empagliflozin: RFI = 24 and RFQ = 0.006; sotagliflozin: RFI = 7 and RFQ = 0.006). Upon meta‐analysis, the result for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was robust (FI = 95 and FQ = 0.010). The reductions in all‐cause (FI = 12 and FQ = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (FI = 9 and FQ = 0.001), while statistically significant, were fragile. CONCLUSION: Improvement in the composite outcome of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death was highly concordant and robust across sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor trials. In contrast, secondary endpoints of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality were statistically fragile, underscoring the need to power trials for mortality to fully understand the benefit of therapies on fatal events. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8934993/ /pubmed/35029056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13785 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Usman, Muhammad Shariq Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb Fonarow, Gregg C. Greene, Stephen J. Friede, Tim Vaduganathan, Muthiah Filippatos, Gerasimos Coats, Andrew J. Stewart Anker, Stefan D. Butler, Javed Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title | Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title_full | Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title_fullStr | Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title_short | Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
title_sort | robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8934993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT usmanmuhammadshariq robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT khanmuhammadshahzeb robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT fonarowgreggc robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT greenestephenj robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT friedetim robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT vaduganathanmuthiah robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT filippatosgerasimos robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT coatsandrewjstewart robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT ankerstefand robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure AT butlerjaved robustnessofoutcomesintrialsevaluatingsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsforheartfailure |