Cargando…
Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study
OBJECTIVES: Reporting of research for stroke-related visual impairment is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to define three core outcome sets (COS) and related core outcome measurements (COM) for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders in stroke research. DES...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35304397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056792 |
_version_ | 1784671991276503040 |
---|---|
author | Rowe, Fiona J Hepworth, Lauren R Kirkham, Jamie J |
author_facet | Rowe, Fiona J Hepworth, Lauren R Kirkham, Jamie J |
author_sort | Rowe, Fiona J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Reporting of research for stroke-related visual impairment is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to define three core outcome sets (COS) and related core outcome measurements (COM) for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders in stroke research. DESIGN: The consensus process consisted of an online three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting of key stakeholders. SETTING: UK-wide survey. PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders included orthoptists, occupational therapists, ophthalmologists, stroke survivors and COS users such as researchers, journal editors and guideline developers. OUTCOME MEASURES: For COS development, a list of potentially relevant visual outcomes was created after review of the literature and further grouped into outcome domains. For COM development, a list of potential instruments was created after review of the literature and quality appraised for reliability and validity. RESULTS: COS—119 potential outcomes extracted from published literature. Similar assessment outcomes were grouped into 24 outcome domains. Delphi process included 123 participants in round 1, 65 round 2, 51 round 3. Twelve participants attended the consensus meeting with recommended outcome domains for central visual impairment (visual acuity, functional vision, quality of life), visual field loss (visual fields, functional vision, quality of life) and ocular motility disorders (eye alignment, eye movements, functional vision, quality of life). COM—52 test options extracted from the COS outcomes and grouped into 16 domains. Thirteen participants attended the COM consensus meeting. Recommended instruments for measurement of these outcomes include; Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution visual acuity, cover test, cardinal position eye movement assessments, peripheral visual field perimetry, Visual Function Questionnaire-25. CONCLUSIONS: COS and COM are defined for vision research for stroke survivors. Their use has potential to reduce heterogeneity in routine clinical practice and improve standardisation and accuracy of vision assessment. Future research is required to evaluate the use of these COS and COM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8935181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89351812022-04-01 Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study Rowe, Fiona J Hepworth, Lauren R Kirkham, Jamie J BMJ Open Ophthalmology OBJECTIVES: Reporting of research for stroke-related visual impairment is inconsistent. The aim of this study was to define three core outcome sets (COS) and related core outcome measurements (COM) for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders in stroke research. DESIGN: The consensus process consisted of an online three-round Delphi survey followed by a consensus meeting of key stakeholders. SETTING: UK-wide survey. PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders included orthoptists, occupational therapists, ophthalmologists, stroke survivors and COS users such as researchers, journal editors and guideline developers. OUTCOME MEASURES: For COS development, a list of potentially relevant visual outcomes was created after review of the literature and further grouped into outcome domains. For COM development, a list of potential instruments was created after review of the literature and quality appraised for reliability and validity. RESULTS: COS—119 potential outcomes extracted from published literature. Similar assessment outcomes were grouped into 24 outcome domains. Delphi process included 123 participants in round 1, 65 round 2, 51 round 3. Twelve participants attended the consensus meeting with recommended outcome domains for central visual impairment (visual acuity, functional vision, quality of life), visual field loss (visual fields, functional vision, quality of life) and ocular motility disorders (eye alignment, eye movements, functional vision, quality of life). COM—52 test options extracted from the COS outcomes and grouped into 16 domains. Thirteen participants attended the COM consensus meeting. Recommended instruments for measurement of these outcomes include; Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution visual acuity, cover test, cardinal position eye movement assessments, peripheral visual field perimetry, Visual Function Questionnaire-25. CONCLUSIONS: COS and COM are defined for vision research for stroke survivors. Their use has potential to reduce heterogeneity in routine clinical practice and improve standardisation and accuracy of vision assessment. Future research is required to evaluate the use of these COS and COM. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8935181/ /pubmed/35304397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056792 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Ophthalmology Rowe, Fiona J Hepworth, Lauren R Kirkham, Jamie J Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title | Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title_full | Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title_fullStr | Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title_short | Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study |
title_sort | development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a delphi and consensus study |
topic | Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35304397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056792 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rowefionaj developmentofcoreoutcomesetsandcoreoutcomemeasuresforcentralvisualimpairmentvisualfieldlossandocularmotilitydisordersduetostrokeadelphiandconsensusstudy AT hepworthlaurenr developmentofcoreoutcomesetsandcoreoutcomemeasuresforcentralvisualimpairmentvisualfieldlossandocularmotilitydisordersduetostrokeadelphiandconsensusstudy AT kirkhamjamiej developmentofcoreoutcomesetsandcoreoutcomemeasuresforcentralvisualimpairmentvisualfieldlossandocularmotilitydisordersduetostrokeadelphiandconsensusstudy |