Cargando…

Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten

CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Nina, Blutke, Andreas, Parzefall, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398
_version_ 1784672037250269184
author Schneider, Nina
Blutke, Andreas
Parzefall, Birgit
author_facet Schneider, Nina
Blutke, Andreas
Parzefall, Birgit
author_sort Schneider, Nina
collection PubMed
description CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed a diagonally orientated metallic foreign body (microchip transponder, 10 mm in length) within the vertebral canal at the level of C1–C2, resulting in a penetrating spinal cord injury. Based on concerns about further iatrogenic spinal cord injury through surgery, medical management was chosen. Despite the severe clinical signs, the kitten returned to ambulation within 6 days of the injury, with controlled urination and defecation. Continuous neurological improvement was seen for up to 6 weeks after the injury at which point a mild-to-moderate ambulatory tetraparesis and ataxia remained, with an overall good quality of life. Follow-up CT at the age of 13 months revealed a relative cranial displacement and rotation of the microchip towards the foramen magnum, while the cat’s neurological status was unchanged. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: This case demonstrated a cervical penetrating spinal cord injury in a growing cat caused by a microchip, which was successfully managed with medical treatment, suggesting that this might be an option for patients at risk of severe surgery-related complications or where owners reject surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8935412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89354122022-03-22 Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten Schneider, Nina Blutke, Andreas Parzefall, Birgit JFMS Open Rep Case Report CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed a diagonally orientated metallic foreign body (microchip transponder, 10 mm in length) within the vertebral canal at the level of C1–C2, resulting in a penetrating spinal cord injury. Based on concerns about further iatrogenic spinal cord injury through surgery, medical management was chosen. Despite the severe clinical signs, the kitten returned to ambulation within 6 days of the injury, with controlled urination and defecation. Continuous neurological improvement was seen for up to 6 weeks after the injury at which point a mild-to-moderate ambulatory tetraparesis and ataxia remained, with an overall good quality of life. Follow-up CT at the age of 13 months revealed a relative cranial displacement and rotation of the microchip towards the foramen magnum, while the cat’s neurological status was unchanged. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: This case demonstrated a cervical penetrating spinal cord injury in a growing cat caused by a microchip, which was successfully managed with medical treatment, suggesting that this might be an option for patients at risk of severe surgery-related complications or where owners reject surgery. SAGE Publications 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8935412/ /pubmed/35321496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Case Report
Schneider, Nina
Blutke, Andreas
Parzefall, Birgit
Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title_full Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title_fullStr Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title_full_unstemmed Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title_short Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
title_sort recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at c1–c2 in a kitten
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398
work_keys_str_mv AT schneidernina recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten
AT blutkeandreas recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten
AT parzefallbirgit recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten