Cargando…
Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten
CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398 |
_version_ | 1784672037250269184 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Nina Blutke, Andreas Parzefall, Birgit |
author_facet | Schneider, Nina Blutke, Andreas Parzefall, Birgit |
author_sort | Schneider, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed a diagonally orientated metallic foreign body (microchip transponder, 10 mm in length) within the vertebral canal at the level of C1–C2, resulting in a penetrating spinal cord injury. Based on concerns about further iatrogenic spinal cord injury through surgery, medical management was chosen. Despite the severe clinical signs, the kitten returned to ambulation within 6 days of the injury, with controlled urination and defecation. Continuous neurological improvement was seen for up to 6 weeks after the injury at which point a mild-to-moderate ambulatory tetraparesis and ataxia remained, with an overall good quality of life. Follow-up CT at the age of 13 months revealed a relative cranial displacement and rotation of the microchip towards the foramen magnum, while the cat’s neurological status was unchanged. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: This case demonstrated a cervical penetrating spinal cord injury in a growing cat caused by a microchip, which was successfully managed with medical treatment, suggesting that this might be an option for patients at risk of severe surgery-related complications or where owners reject surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8935412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89354122022-03-22 Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten Schneider, Nina Blutke, Andreas Parzefall, Birgit JFMS Open Rep Case Report CASE SUMMARY: A 15-week-old male British Shorthair cat was presented for peracute paralysis immediately after microchip implantation. Neurological examination revealed a non-ambulatory tetraparesis and left thoracic limb plegia localised to C1–C5 spinal cord segments. CT of the cervical spine showed a diagonally orientated metallic foreign body (microchip transponder, 10 mm in length) within the vertebral canal at the level of C1–C2, resulting in a penetrating spinal cord injury. Based on concerns about further iatrogenic spinal cord injury through surgery, medical management was chosen. Despite the severe clinical signs, the kitten returned to ambulation within 6 days of the injury, with controlled urination and defecation. Continuous neurological improvement was seen for up to 6 weeks after the injury at which point a mild-to-moderate ambulatory tetraparesis and ataxia remained, with an overall good quality of life. Follow-up CT at the age of 13 months revealed a relative cranial displacement and rotation of the microchip towards the foramen magnum, while the cat’s neurological status was unchanged. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: This case demonstrated a cervical penetrating spinal cord injury in a growing cat caused by a microchip, which was successfully managed with medical treatment, suggesting that this might be an option for patients at risk of severe surgery-related complications or where owners reject surgery. SAGE Publications 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8935412/ /pubmed/35321496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Schneider, Nina Blutke, Andreas Parzefall, Birgit Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title | Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title_full | Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title_fullStr | Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title_full_unstemmed | Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title_short | Recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at C1–C2 in a kitten |
title_sort | recovery after inadvertent intramedullary microchip implantation at c1–c2 in a kitten |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20551169221081398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneidernina recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten AT blutkeandreas recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten AT parzefallbirgit recoveryafterinadvertentintramedullarymicrochipimplantationatc1c2inakitten |