Cargando…
Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial
BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments for smoking cessation are available, long-term abstinence is the exception rather than the norm. Accordingly, there is a need for novel interventions that potentially improve clinical outcome. Although implicit information processing biases, for example appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6 |
_version_ | 1784672080932896768 |
---|---|
author | Wittekind, Charlotte E. Takano, Keisuke Sckopke, Philipp Winkler, Markus H. Werner, Gabriela G. Ehring, Thomas Rüther, Tobias |
author_facet | Wittekind, Charlotte E. Takano, Keisuke Sckopke, Philipp Winkler, Markus H. Werner, Gabriela G. Ehring, Thomas Rüther, Tobias |
author_sort | Wittekind, Charlotte E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments for smoking cessation are available, long-term abstinence is the exception rather than the norm. Accordingly, there is a need for novel interventions that potentially improve clinical outcome. Although implicit information processing biases, for example approach biases for smoking-related stimuli, are ascribed a dominant role in the maintenance of tobacco dependence, these biases are hardly targeted in current treatment. Past research has shown that so-called Approach Bias Modification (AppBM) trainings, aiming to modify this bias, lead to improved long-term abstinence in abstinent alcoholic inpatients when delivered as an add-on to treatment-as-usual. Findings on the efficacy of AppBM in smoking have been inconsistent. The present large-scale clinical trial pursues two goals. First, it aims to investigate the efficacy of AppBM as an add-on to treatment-as-usual in a representative sample of adult smokers. Second, possible mechanisms of change are investigated. METHODS: The study is a randomized-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial. We aim at a final sample of at least 336 adult smokers. Participants are allocated with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to one of the following conditions: (1) treatment-as-usual + AppBM, (2) treatment-as-usual + Sham, (3) treatment-as-usual only. During the add-on training, participants are presented smoking-related and positive pictures and are instructed to respond by either pushing or pulling a joystick, depending on the tilt of the pictures (5(○) to the left/right). During AppBM, all smoking-related pictures are tilted in the direction that is associated with pushing, thereby aiming to train an avoidance bias for smoking. All positive pictures are tilted in the direction associated with pulling. During Sham, the contingency is 50/50. Participants are assessed before and after the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome is prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes include smoking-related variables and psychological distress. Additionally, the motivational significance of smoking-related stimuli (i.e., approach bias, valence) is assessed with different experimental tasks (Approach-Avoidance Task; Single Target Implicit Association Test) and psychophysiological measures. DISCUSSION: This is the first large-scale clinical trial investigating the efficacy of AppBM as an add-on in smokers including a TAU only condition. Additionally, it is the first study to systematically investigate potential mechanisms mediating the effects of treatment on clinical outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00019221, 11/11/2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8935694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89356942022-03-23 Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial Wittekind, Charlotte E. Takano, Keisuke Sckopke, Philipp Winkler, Markus H. Werner, Gabriela G. Ehring, Thomas Rüther, Tobias Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although effective treatments for smoking cessation are available, long-term abstinence is the exception rather than the norm. Accordingly, there is a need for novel interventions that potentially improve clinical outcome. Although implicit information processing biases, for example approach biases for smoking-related stimuli, are ascribed a dominant role in the maintenance of tobacco dependence, these biases are hardly targeted in current treatment. Past research has shown that so-called Approach Bias Modification (AppBM) trainings, aiming to modify this bias, lead to improved long-term abstinence in abstinent alcoholic inpatients when delivered as an add-on to treatment-as-usual. Findings on the efficacy of AppBM in smoking have been inconsistent. The present large-scale clinical trial pursues two goals. First, it aims to investigate the efficacy of AppBM as an add-on to treatment-as-usual in a representative sample of adult smokers. Second, possible mechanisms of change are investigated. METHODS: The study is a randomized-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group superiority trial. We aim at a final sample of at least 336 adult smokers. Participants are allocated with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to one of the following conditions: (1) treatment-as-usual + AppBM, (2) treatment-as-usual + Sham, (3) treatment-as-usual only. During the add-on training, participants are presented smoking-related and positive pictures and are instructed to respond by either pushing or pulling a joystick, depending on the tilt of the pictures (5(○) to the left/right). During AppBM, all smoking-related pictures are tilted in the direction that is associated with pushing, thereby aiming to train an avoidance bias for smoking. All positive pictures are tilted in the direction associated with pulling. During Sham, the contingency is 50/50. Participants are assessed before and after the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome is prolonged abstinence, and secondary outcomes include smoking-related variables and psychological distress. Additionally, the motivational significance of smoking-related stimuli (i.e., approach bias, valence) is assessed with different experimental tasks (Approach-Avoidance Task; Single Target Implicit Association Test) and psychophysiological measures. DISCUSSION: This is the first large-scale clinical trial investigating the efficacy of AppBM as an add-on in smokers including a TAU only condition. Additionally, it is the first study to systematically investigate potential mechanisms mediating the effects of treatment on clinical outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00019221, 11/11/2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6. BioMed Central 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8935694/ /pubmed/35313949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wittekind, Charlotte E. Takano, Keisuke Sckopke, Philipp Winkler, Markus H. Werner, Gabriela G. Ehring, Thomas Rüther, Tobias Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title | Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title_full | Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title_short | Efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
title_sort | efficacy of approach bias modification as an add-on to smoking cessation treatment: study protocol for a randomized-controlled double-blind trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittekindcharlottee efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT takanokeisuke efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT sckopkephilipp efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT winklermarkush efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT wernergabrielag efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT ehringthomas efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial AT ruthertobias efficacyofapproachbiasmodificationasanaddontosmokingcessationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindtrial |