Cargando…

Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fangxing, Zheng, Leyu, Theopold, Jan, Schleifenbaum, Stefan, Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard, Osterhoff, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4
_version_ 1784672100841160704
author Wang, Fangxing
Zheng, Leyu
Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Osterhoff, Georg
author_facet Wang, Fangxing
Zheng, Leyu
Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Osterhoff, Georg
author_sort Wang, Fangxing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: “(bone quality”. Ti,ab.) AND “(human bone specimens)”. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8935787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89357872022-03-23 Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review Wang, Fangxing Zheng, Leyu Theopold, Jan Schleifenbaum, Stefan Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard Osterhoff, Georg J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: “(bone quality”. Ti,ab.) AND “(human bone specimens)”. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4. BioMed Central 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8935787/ /pubmed/35313901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Fangxing
Zheng, Leyu
Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard
Osterhoff, Georg
Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title_full Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title_fullStr Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title_short Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
title_sort methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfangxing methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview
AT zhengleyu methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview
AT theopoldjan methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview
AT schleifenbaumstefan methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview
AT heydechristopheckhard methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview
AT osterhoffgeorg methodsforbonequalityassessmentinhumanbonetissueasystematicreview