Cargando…
Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
BACKGROUND: Both mild and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation are the frequently used protocols for poor ovarian responders. However, there are some debates about which treatment is better. Moreover, little is known about the follicular physiology after the two ovarian stimulation protocols....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1 |
_version_ | 1784672111343697920 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xiaoping Mai, Huisi Chen, Panyu Zhang, Zhiqiang Wu, Taibao Chen, Jianhui Sun, Peng Zhou, Chuanchuan Liang, Xiaoyan Huang, Rui |
author_facet | Liu, Xiaoping Mai, Huisi Chen, Panyu Zhang, Zhiqiang Wu, Taibao Chen, Jianhui Sun, Peng Zhou, Chuanchuan Liang, Xiaoyan Huang, Rui |
author_sort | Liu, Xiaoping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both mild and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation are the frequently used protocols for poor ovarian responders. However, there are some debates about which treatment is better. Moreover, little is known about the follicular physiology after the two ovarian stimulation protocols. This study was intended to investigate the features in granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment after the two different ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders. METHODS: Granulosa cells RNA were sequenced using Illumina Hiseq technology. Specific differently expressed genes and proteins were verified by real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot analysis. Moreover, hormone and cytokine concentrations in the follicular fluid were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. The correlation between the results of molecular experiments and the laboratory outcomes were analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The differentially expressed genes between the two groups were involved in 4 signaling pathways related to the follicular development; three proteins pertinent to the TGF-β signaling pathway were expressed differently in granulosa cells between the two, and the constituents in the follicular fluid were also different. Further, a correlation between the TGF-β signaling pathway and the good-quality embryo was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study made a comparison for the first time in the transcriptome of human granulosa cells and the follicular fluid micro-environment between poor responders with the conventional controlled ovarian stimulation or the mild ovarian stimulation, showing that the TGF-β signaling pathway may correlate with the good-quality of embryos in the mild group, which may be instrumental to the choice of optimal management for IVF patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8935846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89358462022-03-23 Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations Liu, Xiaoping Mai, Huisi Chen, Panyu Zhang, Zhiqiang Wu, Taibao Chen, Jianhui Sun, Peng Zhou, Chuanchuan Liang, Xiaoyan Huang, Rui Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Both mild and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation are the frequently used protocols for poor ovarian responders. However, there are some debates about which treatment is better. Moreover, little is known about the follicular physiology after the two ovarian stimulation protocols. This study was intended to investigate the features in granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment after the two different ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders. METHODS: Granulosa cells RNA were sequenced using Illumina Hiseq technology. Specific differently expressed genes and proteins were verified by real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot analysis. Moreover, hormone and cytokine concentrations in the follicular fluid were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. The correlation between the results of molecular experiments and the laboratory outcomes were analyzed by Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The differentially expressed genes between the two groups were involved in 4 signaling pathways related to the follicular development; three proteins pertinent to the TGF-β signaling pathway were expressed differently in granulosa cells between the two, and the constituents in the follicular fluid were also different. Further, a correlation between the TGF-β signaling pathway and the good-quality embryo was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study made a comparison for the first time in the transcriptome of human granulosa cells and the follicular fluid micro-environment between poor responders with the conventional controlled ovarian stimulation or the mild ovarian stimulation, showing that the TGF-β signaling pathway may correlate with the good-quality of embryos in the mild group, which may be instrumental to the choice of optimal management for IVF patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1. BioMed Central 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8935846/ /pubmed/35313911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Xiaoping Mai, Huisi Chen, Panyu Zhang, Zhiqiang Wu, Taibao Chen, Jianhui Sun, Peng Zhou, Chuanchuan Liang, Xiaoyan Huang, Rui Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title | Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title_full | Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title_fullStr | Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title_short | Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
title_sort | comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00926-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxiaoping comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT maihuisi comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT chenpanyu comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT zhangzhiqiang comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT wutaibao comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT chenjianhui comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT sunpeng comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT zhouchuanchuan comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT liangxiaoyan comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations AT huangrui comparativeanalysesintranscriptomeofhumangranulosacellsandfollicularfluidmicroenvironmentbetweenpoorovarianresponderswithconventionalcontrolledovarianormildovarianstimulations |