Cargando…

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)

BACKGROUND: Physical resilience is known to minimize the adverse outcomes of health stressors for older people. However, validated instruments that assess physical resilience in older adults are rare. Therefore, we aimed to validate the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) to fil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Fang-Wen, Lin, Cheng-Han, Yueh, Fang-Ru, Lo, Yu-Tai, Lin, Chung-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7
_version_ 1784672112742498304
author Hu, Fang-Wen
Lin, Cheng-Han
Yueh, Fang-Ru
Lo, Yu-Tai
Lin, Chung-Ying
author_facet Hu, Fang-Wen
Lin, Cheng-Han
Yueh, Fang-Ru
Lo, Yu-Tai
Lin, Chung-Ying
author_sort Hu, Fang-Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical resilience is known to minimize the adverse outcomes of health stressors for older people. However, validated instruments that assess physical resilience in older adults are rare. Therefore, we aimed to validate the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) to fill the literature gap. METHODS: Content analysis with content validity was first carried out to generate relevant items assessing physical resilience for older adults, and 19 items were developed. Psychometric evaluation of the 19 items was then tested on 200 older adults (mean [SD] age = 76.4 [6.6] years; 51.0% women) for item properties, factor structure, item fit, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, and known-group validity. RESULTS: All 19 items had satisfactory item properties, as they were normally distributed (skewness = -1.03 to 0.38; kurtosis = -1.05 to 0.32). However, two items were removed due to substantial ceiling effects. The retained 17 items were embedded in three factors as suggested by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results. All items except one had satisfactory item fit statistics in Rasch model; thus, the unidimensionality was supported for the three factors on 16 items. The retained 16 items showed promising properties in known-group validity, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency (α = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The 16-item PRIFOR exhibits good psychometric properties. Using this instrument to measure physical resilience would be beneficial to identify factors that could protect older people from negative health consequence. With the use of the PRIFOR, intervention effects could also be evaluated. It is helpful to strengthen resilience and thereby facilitate successful aging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8935854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89358542022-03-23 Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) Hu, Fang-Wen Lin, Cheng-Han Yueh, Fang-Ru Lo, Yu-Tai Lin, Chung-Ying BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Physical resilience is known to minimize the adverse outcomes of health stressors for older people. However, validated instruments that assess physical resilience in older adults are rare. Therefore, we aimed to validate the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) to fill the literature gap. METHODS: Content analysis with content validity was first carried out to generate relevant items assessing physical resilience for older adults, and 19 items were developed. Psychometric evaluation of the 19 items was then tested on 200 older adults (mean [SD] age = 76.4 [6.6] years; 51.0% women) for item properties, factor structure, item fit, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, and known-group validity. RESULTS: All 19 items had satisfactory item properties, as they were normally distributed (skewness = -1.03 to 0.38; kurtosis = -1.05 to 0.32). However, two items were removed due to substantial ceiling effects. The retained 17 items were embedded in three factors as suggested by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results. All items except one had satisfactory item fit statistics in Rasch model; thus, the unidimensionality was supported for the three factors on 16 items. The retained 16 items showed promising properties in known-group validity, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency (α = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The 16-item PRIFOR exhibits good psychometric properties. Using this instrument to measure physical resilience would be beneficial to identify factors that could protect older people from negative health consequence. With the use of the PRIFOR, intervention effects could also be evaluated. It is helpful to strengthen resilience and thereby facilitate successful aging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8935854/ /pubmed/35313802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Fang-Wen
Lin, Cheng-Han
Yueh, Fang-Ru
Lo, Yu-Tai
Lin, Chung-Ying
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title_full Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title_fullStr Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title_full_unstemmed Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title_short Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)
title_sort development and psychometric evaluation of the physical resilience instrument for older adults (prifor)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hufangwen developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthephysicalresilienceinstrumentforolderadultsprifor
AT linchenghan developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthephysicalresilienceinstrumentforolderadultsprifor
AT yuehfangru developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthephysicalresilienceinstrumentforolderadultsprifor
AT loyutai developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthephysicalresilienceinstrumentforolderadultsprifor
AT linchungying developmentandpsychometricevaluationofthephysicalresilienceinstrumentforolderadultsprifor