Cargando…

Lessons for Treating Structural Heart Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of structural heart disease (SHD) patients treated during the regional peak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (“COVID era”) compared with historical controls. During the COVID era, elective SHD procedures at Beth Israel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuttle, Mark K., Poulin, Marie-France, Sharma, Ravi K., Ho, Kalon K.L., Casso-Dominguez, Abel, Guibone, Kimberly, Pinto, Duane S., Laham, Roger J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24748706.2021.1981561
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of structural heart disease (SHD) patients treated during the regional peak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (“COVID era”) compared with historical controls. During the COVID era, elective SHD procedures at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center were canceled but urgent cases were still performed. We enacted several practice changes in an effort to minimize complications, prevent COVID transmission, and decrease hospital stay during the pandemic. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected on all patients who underwent SHD procedures during the COVID era and compared with patients treated during the same time period in 2019. RESULTS: Compared with SHD patients treated during 2019 (N = 259), those treated during the COVID era (N = 26) had higher left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP; 28 vs. 21 mmHg, p = 0.001), and were more likely New York Heart Association class IV (26.9% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.019), but had a lower rate of bleeding/vascular complications (0% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.013), a lower rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.019), and a greater proportion of patients were discharged on post-operative day 1 (POD#1; 68.2% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Practice changes employed for patients treated during the COVID era were associated with fewer vascular complications, a greater proportion of patients discharged on POD#1, and a lower rate of pacemaker implantation despite more severe illness. As a result, we plan to continue these practices in the post-COVID era.