Cargando…
Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective random...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725 |
_version_ | 1784672165887475712 |
---|---|
author | Weinstein, Milena M. Dunivan, Gena Guaderrama, Noelani M. Richter, Holly E. |
author_facet | Weinstein, Milena M. Dunivan, Gena Guaderrama, Noelani M. Richter, Holly E. |
author_sort | Weinstein, Milena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, women with stress or stress-predominant mixed UI were randomized to pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital therapeutic device or a home training program using written and narrated instructions. Primary outcomes were change in UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory, Short Form) score and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes on a 3-day bladder diary. A sample size of 139 per group (n=278) was planned to meet the power analysis requirements for the UDI-6 score (n=278) and the bladder diary (n=78). Prespecified secondary outcomes included quality-of-life surveys and adherence reporting. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2021, 5,353 participants were screened, and 363 were randomized: 182 in the intervention and 181 in the control group. There were no baseline clinicodemographic differences between groups. The mean change in UDI-6 score was significantly greater for the intervention group compared with the control group (18.8 vs 14.7, P=.01). The median (interquartile range) number of SUI episodes on the 3-day bladder diary was significantly reduced from 5 (3–8) and 5 (3–8) episodes to 1 (0–3) and 2 (1–4) (P=.005) in the intervention group compared with control group, respectively. A significantly greater number of participants in the intervention group than in the control group reported they were “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) (63/143 [44.1% vs 45/156 [28.8%], odds ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.21–3.15). There were no device-related severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this all-remote, virtually conducted trial, pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device resulted in significantly improved UI symptoms and reduction of UI episodes compared with a home training program. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04508153. FUNDING SOURCE: Renovia Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8936159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89361592022-04-01 Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial Weinstein, Milena M. Dunivan, Gena Guaderrama, Noelani M. Richter, Holly E. Obstet Gynecol Contents To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, women with stress or stress-predominant mixed UI were randomized to pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital therapeutic device or a home training program using written and narrated instructions. Primary outcomes were change in UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory, Short Form) score and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes on a 3-day bladder diary. A sample size of 139 per group (n=278) was planned to meet the power analysis requirements for the UDI-6 score (n=278) and the bladder diary (n=78). Prespecified secondary outcomes included quality-of-life surveys and adherence reporting. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2021, 5,353 participants were screened, and 363 were randomized: 182 in the intervention and 181 in the control group. There were no baseline clinicodemographic differences between groups. The mean change in UDI-6 score was significantly greater for the intervention group compared with the control group (18.8 vs 14.7, P=.01). The median (interquartile range) number of SUI episodes on the 3-day bladder diary was significantly reduced from 5 (3–8) and 5 (3–8) episodes to 1 (0–3) and 2 (1–4) (P=.005) in the intervention group compared with control group, respectively. A significantly greater number of participants in the intervention group than in the control group reported they were “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) (63/143 [44.1% vs 45/156 [28.8%], odds ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.21–3.15). There were no device-related severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this all-remote, virtually conducted trial, pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device resulted in significantly improved UI symptoms and reduction of UI episodes compared with a home training program. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04508153. FUNDING SOURCE: Renovia Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8936159/ /pubmed/35271539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Contents Weinstein, Milena M. Dunivan, Gena Guaderrama, Noelani M. Richter, Holly E. Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | digital therapeutic device for urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Contents |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weinsteinmilenam digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dunivangena digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guaderramanoelanim digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT richterhollye digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial |