Cargando…

Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstein, Milena M., Dunivan, Gena, Guaderrama, Noelani M., Richter, Holly E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725
_version_ 1784672165887475712
author Weinstein, Milena M.
Dunivan, Gena
Guaderrama, Noelani M.
Richter, Holly E.
author_facet Weinstein, Milena M.
Dunivan, Gena
Guaderrama, Noelani M.
Richter, Holly E.
author_sort Weinstein, Milena M.
collection PubMed
description To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, women with stress or stress-predominant mixed UI were randomized to pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital therapeutic device or a home training program using written and narrated instructions. Primary outcomes were change in UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory, Short Form) score and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes on a 3-day bladder diary. A sample size of 139 per group (n=278) was planned to meet the power analysis requirements for the UDI-6 score (n=278) and the bladder diary (n=78). Prespecified secondary outcomes included quality-of-life surveys and adherence reporting. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2021, 5,353 participants were screened, and 363 were randomized: 182 in the intervention and 181 in the control group. There were no baseline clinicodemographic differences between groups. The mean change in UDI-6 score was significantly greater for the intervention group compared with the control group (18.8 vs 14.7, P=.01). The median (interquartile range) number of SUI episodes on the 3-day bladder diary was significantly reduced from 5 (3–8) and 5 (3–8) episodes to 1 (0–3) and 2 (1–4) (P=.005) in the intervention group compared with control group, respectively. A significantly greater number of participants in the intervention group than in the control group reported they were “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) (63/143 [44.1% vs 45/156 [28.8%], odds ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.21–3.15). There were no device-related severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this all-remote, virtually conducted trial, pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device resulted in significantly improved UI symptoms and reduction of UI episodes compared with a home training program. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04508153. FUNDING SOURCE: Renovia Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8936159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89361592022-04-01 Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial Weinstein, Milena M. Dunivan, Gena Guaderrama, Noelani M. Richter, Holly E. Obstet Gynecol Contents To evaluate whether pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital intravaginal device is more effective than home pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In a remote, virtually executed 8-week prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, women with stress or stress-predominant mixed UI were randomized to pelvic floor muscle training using a motion-based digital therapeutic device or a home training program using written and narrated instructions. Primary outcomes were change in UDI-6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory, Short Form) score and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) episodes on a 3-day bladder diary. A sample size of 139 per group (n=278) was planned to meet the power analysis requirements for the UDI-6 score (n=278) and the bladder diary (n=78). Prespecified secondary outcomes included quality-of-life surveys and adherence reporting. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2021, 5,353 participants were screened, and 363 were randomized: 182 in the intervention and 181 in the control group. There were no baseline clinicodemographic differences between groups. The mean change in UDI-6 score was significantly greater for the intervention group compared with the control group (18.8 vs 14.7, P=.01). The median (interquartile range) number of SUI episodes on the 3-day bladder diary was significantly reduced from 5 (3–8) and 5 (3–8) episodes to 1 (0–3) and 2 (1–4) (P=.005) in the intervention group compared with control group, respectively. A significantly greater number of participants in the intervention group than in the control group reported they were “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) (63/143 [44.1% vs 45/156 [28.8%], odds ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.21–3.15). There were no device-related severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this all-remote, virtually conducted trial, pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based digital therapeutic device resulted in significantly improved UI symptoms and reduction of UI episodes compared with a home training program. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04508153. FUNDING SOURCE: Renovia Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8936159/ /pubmed/35271539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Weinstein, Milena M.
Dunivan, Gena
Guaderrama, Noelani M.
Richter, Holly E.
Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort digital therapeutic device for urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725
work_keys_str_mv AT weinsteinmilenam digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dunivangena digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guaderramanoelanim digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT richterhollye digitaltherapeuticdeviceforurinaryincontinencearandomizedcontrolledtrial