Cargando…
Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have warned about the effects of smoking on urolithiasis. Some studies have deemed that smoking has a promoting effect on urolithiasis, whereas others have considered that no inevitable association exists between the two. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.816756 |
_version_ | 1784672210092294144 |
---|---|
author | Yue, Ling Pai, Qiaofeng Wu, Xiaolin Zhang, Jinghua |
author_facet | Yue, Ling Pai, Qiaofeng Wu, Xiaolin Zhang, Jinghua |
author_sort | Yue, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have warned about the effects of smoking on urolithiasis. Some studies have deemed that smoking has a promoting effect on urolithiasis, whereas others have considered that no inevitable association exists between the two. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate whether smoking is associated with urolithiasis risk. METHODS: To identify publications from related observational studies, we performed a search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception until October 1, 2021. According to the heterogeneity, random-effect model was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Five articles were included in the meta-analysis, representing data for 20,402 subjects, of which 1,758 (8.62%) had urolithiasis as defined according to the criteria. Three articles are concerned with analysis between ex-smokers and non-smokers, in which a significant difference was observed (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.48–2.01). Our comparison of current smokers with non-smokers in another meta-analysis of three articles revealed no significant difference between them (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.94–1.23). Finally, we separated subjects into ever-smokers and never-smokers and found a significant difference between the two groups in the analysis of three articles (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17–1.47). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the current results. CONCLUSION: Combined evidence from observational studies demonstrates a significant relation between smoking and urolithiasis. The trend of elevated urolithiasis risk from smoking was found in ever-smokers vs. never-smokers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8936389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89363892022-03-22 Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Yue, Ling Pai, Qiaofeng Wu, Xiaolin Zhang, Jinghua Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have warned about the effects of smoking on urolithiasis. Some studies have deemed that smoking has a promoting effect on urolithiasis, whereas others have considered that no inevitable association exists between the two. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate whether smoking is associated with urolithiasis risk. METHODS: To identify publications from related observational studies, we performed a search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception until October 1, 2021. According to the heterogeneity, random-effect model was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Five articles were included in the meta-analysis, representing data for 20,402 subjects, of which 1,758 (8.62%) had urolithiasis as defined according to the criteria. Three articles are concerned with analysis between ex-smokers and non-smokers, in which a significant difference was observed (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.48–2.01). Our comparison of current smokers with non-smokers in another meta-analysis of three articles revealed no significant difference between them (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.94–1.23). Finally, we separated subjects into ever-smokers and never-smokers and found a significant difference between the two groups in the analysis of three articles (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.17–1.47). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the current results. CONCLUSION: Combined evidence from observational studies demonstrates a significant relation between smoking and urolithiasis. The trend of elevated urolithiasis risk from smoking was found in ever-smokers vs. never-smokers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8936389/ /pubmed/35321192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.816756 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yue, Pai, Wu and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Yue, Ling Pai, Qiaofeng Wu, Xiaolin Zhang, Jinghua Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title | Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full | Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_fullStr | Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_short | Smoking and Risk of Urolithiasis: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_sort | smoking and risk of urolithiasis: meta-analysis of observational studies |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35321192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.816756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yueling smokingandriskofurolithiasismetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT paiqiaofeng smokingandriskofurolithiasismetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT wuxiaolin smokingandriskofurolithiasismetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT zhangjinghua smokingandriskofurolithiasismetaanalysisofobservationalstudies |