Cargando…

Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia

Pantomime has a long tradition in clinical neuropsychology of apraxia. It has been much more used by researchers and clinicians to assess tool-use disorders than real tool use. Nevertheless, it remains incompletely understood and has given rise to controversies, such as the involvement of the left i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osiurak, François, Reynaud, Emanuelle, Baumard, Josselin, Rossetti, Yves, Bartolo, Angela, Lesourd, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab263
_version_ 1784672216702517248
author Osiurak, François
Reynaud, Emanuelle
Baumard, Josselin
Rossetti, Yves
Bartolo, Angela
Lesourd, Mathieu
author_facet Osiurak, François
Reynaud, Emanuelle
Baumard, Josselin
Rossetti, Yves
Bartolo, Angela
Lesourd, Mathieu
author_sort Osiurak, François
collection PubMed
description Pantomime has a long tradition in clinical neuropsychology of apraxia. It has been much more used by researchers and clinicians to assess tool-use disorders than real tool use. Nevertheless, it remains incompletely understood and has given rise to controversies, such as the involvement of the left inferior parietal lobe or the nature of the underlying cognitive processes. The present article offers a comprehensive framework, with the aim of specifying the neural and cognitive bases of pantomime. To do so, we conducted a series of meta-analyses of brain-lesion, neuroimaging and behavioural studies about pantomime and other related tasks (i.e. real tool use, imitation of meaningless postures and semantic knowledge). The first key finding is that the area PF (Area PF complex) within the left inferior parietal lobe is crucially involved in both pantomime and real tool use as well as in the kinematics component of pantomime. The second key finding is the absence of a well-defined neural substrate for the posture component of pantomime (both grip errors and body-part-as-tool responses). The third key finding is the role played by the intraparietal sulcus in both pantomime and imitation of meaningless postures. The fourth key finding is that the left angular gyrus seems to be critical in the production of motor actions directed towards the body. The fifth key finding is that performance on pantomime is strongly correlated with the severity of semantic deficits. Taken together, these findings invite us to offer a neurocognitive model of pantomime, which provides an integrated alternative to the two hypotheses that dominate the field: The gesture-engram hypothesis and the communicative hypothesis. More specifically, this model assumes that technical reasoning (notably the left area PF), the motor-control system (notably the intraparietal sulcus), body structural description (notably the left angular gyrus), semantic knowledge (notably the polar temporal lobes) and potentially theory of mind (notably the middle prefrontal cortex) work in concert to produce pantomime. The original features of this model open new avenues for understanding the neurocognitive bases of pantomime, emphasizing that pantomime is a communicative task that nevertheless originates in specific tool-use (not motor-related) cognitive processes. <Please insert Graphical abstract here>
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8936430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89364302022-03-28 Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia Osiurak, François Reynaud, Emanuelle Baumard, Josselin Rossetti, Yves Bartolo, Angela Lesourd, Mathieu Brain Commun Review Article Pantomime has a long tradition in clinical neuropsychology of apraxia. It has been much more used by researchers and clinicians to assess tool-use disorders than real tool use. Nevertheless, it remains incompletely understood and has given rise to controversies, such as the involvement of the left inferior parietal lobe or the nature of the underlying cognitive processes. The present article offers a comprehensive framework, with the aim of specifying the neural and cognitive bases of pantomime. To do so, we conducted a series of meta-analyses of brain-lesion, neuroimaging and behavioural studies about pantomime and other related tasks (i.e. real tool use, imitation of meaningless postures and semantic knowledge). The first key finding is that the area PF (Area PF complex) within the left inferior parietal lobe is crucially involved in both pantomime and real tool use as well as in the kinematics component of pantomime. The second key finding is the absence of a well-defined neural substrate for the posture component of pantomime (both grip errors and body-part-as-tool responses). The third key finding is the role played by the intraparietal sulcus in both pantomime and imitation of meaningless postures. The fourth key finding is that the left angular gyrus seems to be critical in the production of motor actions directed towards the body. The fifth key finding is that performance on pantomime is strongly correlated with the severity of semantic deficits. Taken together, these findings invite us to offer a neurocognitive model of pantomime, which provides an integrated alternative to the two hypotheses that dominate the field: The gesture-engram hypothesis and the communicative hypothesis. More specifically, this model assumes that technical reasoning (notably the left area PF), the motor-control system (notably the intraparietal sulcus), body structural description (notably the left angular gyrus), semantic knowledge (notably the polar temporal lobes) and potentially theory of mind (notably the middle prefrontal cortex) work in concert to produce pantomime. The original features of this model open new avenues for understanding the neurocognitive bases of pantomime, emphasizing that pantomime is a communicative task that nevertheless originates in specific tool-use (not motor-related) cognitive processes. <Please insert Graphical abstract here> Oxford University Press 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8936430/ /pubmed/35350708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab263 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Osiurak, François
Reynaud, Emanuelle
Baumard, Josselin
Rossetti, Yves
Bartolo, Angela
Lesourd, Mathieu
Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title_full Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title_fullStr Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title_full_unstemmed Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title_short Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
title_sort pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab263
work_keys_str_mv AT osiurakfrancois pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia
AT reynaudemanuelle pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia
AT baumardjosselin pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia
AT rossettiyves pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia
AT bartoloangela pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia
AT lesourdmathieu pantomimeoftooluselookingbeyondapraxia