Cargando…
Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients
BACKGROUND: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a parameter which reflects nutritional and inflammatory status. The prognostic value of PNI in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains in debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value and clinicopathological features of PNI in RCC. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265119 |
_version_ | 1784672231328055296 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Qingping Liu, Ling Li, Ting Lei, Changjiang Wan, Huan |
author_facet | Peng, Qingping Liu, Ling Li, Ting Lei, Changjiang Wan, Huan |
author_sort | Peng, Qingping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a parameter which reflects nutritional and inflammatory status. The prognostic value of PNI in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains in debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value and clinicopathological features of PNI in RCC. METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for meta-analysis. The association between PNI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinicopathological factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 7,629 patients were included for meta-analysis. A decreased PNI was shown to be a significant predictor of worse OS (HR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.64–2.42, p<0.001), CSS (HR = 2.54, 95%CI = 1.61–4.00, p<0.001), and DFS/PFS/RFS (HR = 2.12, 95%CI = 1.82–2.46, p<0.001) in RCC. Furthermore, a low PNI was correlated with Fuhrman grade III-IV (OR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.27–3.02, p = 0.002), T stage T3-T4 (OR = 2.21, 95%CI = 1.27–3.87, p = 0.005), presence of sarcomatoid differentiation (OR = 5.00, 95%CI = 2.52–9.92, p<0.001), and presence of tumor necrosis (OR = 3.63, 95%CI = 2.54–5.19, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PNI is an independent prognostic indicator of survival and associated with Fuhrman grade, T stage, sarcomatoid differentiation, and tumor necrosis in patients with RCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8936492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89364922022-03-22 Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients Peng, Qingping Liu, Ling Li, Ting Lei, Changjiang Wan, Huan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a parameter which reflects nutritional and inflammatory status. The prognostic value of PNI in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains in debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value and clinicopathological features of PNI in RCC. METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for meta-analysis. The association between PNI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and clinicopathological factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 7,629 patients were included for meta-analysis. A decreased PNI was shown to be a significant predictor of worse OS (HR = 2.00, 95%CI = 1.64–2.42, p<0.001), CSS (HR = 2.54, 95%CI = 1.61–4.00, p<0.001), and DFS/PFS/RFS (HR = 2.12, 95%CI = 1.82–2.46, p<0.001) in RCC. Furthermore, a low PNI was correlated with Fuhrman grade III-IV (OR = 1.96, 95%CI = 1.27–3.02, p = 0.002), T stage T3-T4 (OR = 2.21, 95%CI = 1.27–3.87, p = 0.005), presence of sarcomatoid differentiation (OR = 5.00, 95%CI = 2.52–9.92, p<0.001), and presence of tumor necrosis (OR = 3.63, 95%CI = 2.54–5.19, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PNI is an independent prognostic indicator of survival and associated with Fuhrman grade, T stage, sarcomatoid differentiation, and tumor necrosis in patients with RCC. Public Library of Science 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8936492/ /pubmed/35312690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265119 Text en © 2022 Peng et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peng, Qingping Liu, Ling Li, Ting Lei, Changjiang Wan, Huan Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title | Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title_full | Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title_fullStr | Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title_short | Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
title_sort | prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 7,629 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35312690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengqingping prognosticimpactofprognosticnutritionalindexonrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysisof7629patients AT liuling prognosticimpactofprognosticnutritionalindexonrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysisof7629patients AT liting prognosticimpactofprognosticnutritionalindexonrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysisof7629patients AT leichangjiang prognosticimpactofprognosticnutritionalindexonrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysisof7629patients AT wanhuan prognosticimpactofprognosticnutritionalindexonrenalcellcarcinomaametaanalysisof7629patients |