Cargando…

Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway

BACKGROUND: Pediatric infraumbilical surgeries are often performed under general anaesthesia using different modes of ventilation through Laryngeal Mask Airway .Although controlled ventilation has been successfully used, very less studies have been done to compare them with spontaneous ventilation f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhar, Rohini, Sofi, Khalid, Mir, Shafat Ahmad, Jehangir, Majid, Wazir, Mohsin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320969
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_120_21
_version_ 1784672260095737856
author Dhar, Rohini
Sofi, Khalid
Mir, Shafat Ahmad
Jehangir, Majid
Wazir, Mohsin
author_facet Dhar, Rohini
Sofi, Khalid
Mir, Shafat Ahmad
Jehangir, Majid
Wazir, Mohsin
author_sort Dhar, Rohini
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pediatric infraumbilical surgeries are often performed under general anaesthesia using different modes of ventilation through Laryngeal Mask Airway .Although controlled ventilation has been successfully used, very less studies have been done to compare them with spontaneous ventilation for short duration surgeries. AIMS: We tried to measure quantitave differences in haemodynamic and respiratory parameters and assess the recovery profile between controlled and spontaneous ventilation using Proseal LMA. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study that comprised 90 American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classes I and II pediatric patients posted for infra umbilical surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 paediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries were included. Three different ventilation strategies: spontaneous , pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation were applied depending on attending anaesthesiologist's preference. Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded during the procedure. Post procedure parameters including need for supplementary oxygen, recovery time, complications were recorded. STATISTICAL METHODS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for inter group analysis and for multiple comparisons, least significant difference (LSD) test was applied. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, whichever appropriate, was used for comparison of categorical variables. RESULTS: The mean time interval between end of surgery and removal of LMA was significantly higher in PCV group in comparison to SV and PSV groups. In SV group lesser number of patients required oxygen supplementation and had shorter stay in recovery than PCV group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that spontaneous mode of ventilation can be used as safely as controlled /assist ventilation mode in short duration surgeries in high turn over settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8936875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89368752022-03-22 Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Dhar, Rohini Sofi, Khalid Mir, Shafat Ahmad Jehangir, Majid Wazir, Mohsin Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Pediatric infraumbilical surgeries are often performed under general anaesthesia using different modes of ventilation through Laryngeal Mask Airway .Although controlled ventilation has been successfully used, very less studies have been done to compare them with spontaneous ventilation for short duration surgeries. AIMS: We tried to measure quantitave differences in haemodynamic and respiratory parameters and assess the recovery profile between controlled and spontaneous ventilation using Proseal LMA. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study that comprised 90 American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classes I and II pediatric patients posted for infra umbilical surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 paediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries were included. Three different ventilation strategies: spontaneous , pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation were applied depending on attending anaesthesiologist's preference. Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded during the procedure. Post procedure parameters including need for supplementary oxygen, recovery time, complications were recorded. STATISTICAL METHODS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for inter group analysis and for multiple comparisons, least significant difference (LSD) test was applied. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, whichever appropriate, was used for comparison of categorical variables. RESULTS: The mean time interval between end of surgery and removal of LMA was significantly higher in PCV group in comparison to SV and PSV groups. In SV group lesser number of patients required oxygen supplementation and had shorter stay in recovery than PCV group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that spontaneous mode of ventilation can be used as safely as controlled /assist ventilation mode in short duration surgeries in high turn over settings. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8936875/ /pubmed/35320969 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_120_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhar, Rohini
Sofi, Khalid
Mir, Shafat Ahmad
Jehangir, Majid
Wazir, Mohsin
Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title_full Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title_fullStr Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title_short Comparison of Spontaneous Ventilation, Pressure Control Ventilation and Pressure Support Ventilation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery Using ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
title_sort comparison of spontaneous ventilation, pressure control ventilation and pressure support ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery using proseal laryngeal mask airway
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320969
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_120_21
work_keys_str_mv AT dharrohini comparisonofspontaneousventilationpressurecontrolventilationandpressuresupportventilationinpediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgeryusingproseallaryngealmaskairway
AT sofikhalid comparisonofspontaneousventilationpressurecontrolventilationandpressuresupportventilationinpediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgeryusingproseallaryngealmaskairway
AT mirshafatahmad comparisonofspontaneousventilationpressurecontrolventilationandpressuresupportventilationinpediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgeryusingproseallaryngealmaskairway
AT jehangirmajid comparisonofspontaneousventilationpressurecontrolventilationandpressuresupportventilationinpediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgeryusingproseallaryngealmaskairway
AT wazirmohsin comparisonofspontaneousventilationpressurecontrolventilationandpressuresupportventilationinpediatricpatientsundergoinginfraumbilicalsurgeryusingproseallaryngealmaskairway