Cargando…

Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes

BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) increases risk of maternal and neonatal diseases. Expectant treatment is one major treatment for PPROM patients, but it raises concerns on infection. Currently, the optimal delivery time for PPROM patients is still unclear, and there are vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Chunmei, Deng, Xiaohui, Hong, Fanzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8705005
_version_ 1784672471300964352
author Yan, Chunmei
Deng, Xiaohui
Hong, Fanzhen
author_facet Yan, Chunmei
Deng, Xiaohui
Hong, Fanzhen
author_sort Yan, Chunmei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) increases risk of maternal and neonatal diseases. Expectant treatment is one major treatment for PPROM patients, but it raises concerns on infection. Currently, the optimal delivery time for PPROM patients is still unclear, and there are various outcomes for the patients with PPROM. Previous studies conducted to analyze the pregnancy outcome showed inconsistent results. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes for comparison among different latency periods of patients with PPROM at a university hospital in China. METHOD: This was a retrospective study. We divided all patients with PPROM into four groups according to gestational weeks, namely, group A (GA 24–27(+6)), group B (GA 28–31(+6)), group C (GA 32–33(+6)), and group D (GA34-36(+6)). The maternal and neonatal outcomes of each group were observed, respectively. Groups B and C were separately divided into two subgroups according to the median latency period of each group, namely, B1, B2, C1, and C2. Then, the differences of pregnancy outcomes between B1 and B2, C1 and C2, were compared, respectively. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: Group A: the common maternal and neonatal complications were the increased infection index before labour, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Groups B, C, and D: the common maternal and neonatal complications were the increased infection index before labour, fetal distress, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and patent foramen ovale. Comparison of pregnancy outcome between group B1 and group B2 showed higher incidence rate of increased infection index before labour, lower incidence rate of respiratory distress syndrome, electrolyte disturbance, and premature brain in group B2 than those in group B1. Comparison of pregnancy outcome between group C1 and group C2 showed the higher incidence of increased infection index before labour, bigger birth weight, and shorter hospital stay in group C2 than those in group C1. CONCLUSION: Increased infection index before labour was common maternal complication in four groups. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and neonatal pneumonia were top neonatal complications in four groups. The prolongation of latency period was beneficial to newborns of patients with gestational week at 28–31(+6) weeks, while it did not benefit those with gestational week beyond 32 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8938061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89380612022-03-22 Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Yan, Chunmei Deng, Xiaohui Hong, Fanzhen J Healthc Eng Research Article BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) increases risk of maternal and neonatal diseases. Expectant treatment is one major treatment for PPROM patients, but it raises concerns on infection. Currently, the optimal delivery time for PPROM patients is still unclear, and there are various outcomes for the patients with PPROM. Previous studies conducted to analyze the pregnancy outcome showed inconsistent results. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes for comparison among different latency periods of patients with PPROM at a university hospital in China. METHOD: This was a retrospective study. We divided all patients with PPROM into four groups according to gestational weeks, namely, group A (GA 24–27(+6)), group B (GA 28–31(+6)), group C (GA 32–33(+6)), and group D (GA34-36(+6)). The maternal and neonatal outcomes of each group were observed, respectively. Groups B and C were separately divided into two subgroups according to the median latency period of each group, namely, B1, B2, C1, and C2. Then, the differences of pregnancy outcomes between B1 and B2, C1 and C2, were compared, respectively. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: Group A: the common maternal and neonatal complications were the increased infection index before labour, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Groups B, C, and D: the common maternal and neonatal complications were the increased infection index before labour, fetal distress, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and patent foramen ovale. Comparison of pregnancy outcome between group B1 and group B2 showed higher incidence rate of increased infection index before labour, lower incidence rate of respiratory distress syndrome, electrolyte disturbance, and premature brain in group B2 than those in group B1. Comparison of pregnancy outcome between group C1 and group C2 showed the higher incidence of increased infection index before labour, bigger birth weight, and shorter hospital stay in group C2 than those in group C1. CONCLUSION: Increased infection index before labour was common maternal complication in four groups. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and neonatal pneumonia were top neonatal complications in four groups. The prolongation of latency period was beneficial to newborns of patients with gestational week at 28–31(+6) weeks, while it did not benefit those with gestational week beyond 32 weeks. Hindawi 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8938061/ /pubmed/35320995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8705005 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chunmei Yan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Chunmei
Deng, Xiaohui
Hong, Fanzhen
Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title_full Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title_fullStr Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title_short Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Patients with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
title_sort analysis of maternal and neonatal outcome of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8705005
work_keys_str_mv AT yanchunmei analysisofmaternalandneonataloutcomeofpatientswithpretermprelaborruptureofmembranes
AT dengxiaohui analysisofmaternalandneonataloutcomeofpatientswithpretermprelaborruptureofmembranes
AT hongfanzhen analysisofmaternalandneonataloutcomeofpatientswithpretermprelaborruptureofmembranes