Cargando…

Impacto de la alteración de la continuidad asistencial en los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 durante la pandemia de COVID-19

AIM: To assess the impact of the alteration of the continuity of care in patients with type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Follow-up study with 587 primary care patients with DM2, and control according to the redGDPS-2018 criteria in 2018 and 2020. Activities carried o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuevas Fernández, F.J., Gutiérrez Galeote, J.C., García Marrero, M.R., Iglesias Girón, M.J., Cabrera de León, A., Aguirre-Jaime, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2022.02.007
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess the impact of the alteration of the continuity of care in patients with type 2 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Follow-up study with 587 primary care patients with DM2, and control according to the redGDPS-2018 criteria in 2018 and 2020. Activities carried out and control status of patients were compared using statistical tests appropriate to type and distribution of each variable, for a significance level P≤.05. RESULTS: Sample was made up of 587 patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) in 2018 (54% men), age of 66 ± 11, in range of 29-91 years. All the care indicators decreased in 2020: A1c was determined in 68% of patients (382/558 after 29 deaths); 59% remained with good control, 17% with poor control, 10% improved and 14% worsened (P<.001). Those who had ECG and retinography performed in 2018 and not in 2020 show a lower degree of worsening than those who did not have them done in 2018 but they did in 2020 (16% vs 25%, P<.001 and 13% vs 42%, P=.002). Those who decrease their visits to family doctor and nurse show less deterioration than those who increase them (14% vs 26%; P<.001 and 17% vs 23%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inattention impeded control of 32% of the patients. Poor control in 2020 was lower in those who were controlled in 2018, and who decreased their attendance at the health center in 2020. Possibly adequate pre-pandemic training in self-care has led to the empowerment of the patient during a pandemic period.