Cargando…
Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We construc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9 |
_version_ | 1784672541018685440 |
---|---|
author | Nishida, Naoshi Yamakawa, Makoto Shiina, Tsuyoshi Mekada, Yoshito Nishida, Mutsumi Sakamoto, Naoya Nishimura, Takashi Iijima, Hiroko Hirai, Toshiko Takahashi, Ken Sato, Masaya Tateishi, Ryosuke Ogawa, Masahiro Mori, Hideaki Kitano, Masayuki Toyoda, Hidenori Ogawa, Chikara Kudo, Masatoshi |
author_facet | Nishida, Naoshi Yamakawa, Makoto Shiina, Tsuyoshi Mekada, Yoshito Nishida, Mutsumi Sakamoto, Naoya Nishimura, Takashi Iijima, Hiroko Hirai, Toshiko Takahashi, Ken Sato, Masaya Tateishi, Ryosuke Ogawa, Masahiro Mori, Hideaki Kitano, Masayuki Toyoda, Hidenori Ogawa, Chikara Kudo, Masatoshi |
author_sort | Nishida, Naoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We constructed three AI models based on still B-mode images: model-1 using 24,675 images, model-2 using 57,145 images, and model-3 using 70,950 images. A convolutional neural network was used to train the US images. The four-class liver tumor discrimination by AI, namely, cysts, hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic tumors, was examined. The accuracy of the AI diagnosis was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation. The diagnostic performances of the AI models and human experts were also compared using an independent test cohort of video images. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of model-1, model-2, and model-3 in the four tumor types are 86.8%, 91.0%, and 91.1%, whereas those for malignant tumor are 91.3%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. In the independent comparison of the AIs and physicians, the percentages of correct diagnoses (accuracies) by the AIs are 80.0%, 81.8%, and 89.1% in model-1, model-2, and model-3, respectively. Meanwhile, the median percentages of correct diagnoses are 67.3% (range 63.6%–69.1%) and 47.3% (45.5%–47.3%) by human experts and non-experts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The performance of the AI models surpassed that of human experts in the four-class discrimination and benign and malignant discrimination of liver tumors. Thus, the AI models can help prevent human errors in US diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8938378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89383782022-04-07 Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts Nishida, Naoshi Yamakawa, Makoto Shiina, Tsuyoshi Mekada, Yoshito Nishida, Mutsumi Sakamoto, Naoya Nishimura, Takashi Iijima, Hiroko Hirai, Toshiko Takahashi, Ken Sato, Masaya Tateishi, Ryosuke Ogawa, Masahiro Mori, Hideaki Kitano, Masayuki Toyoda, Hidenori Ogawa, Chikara Kudo, Masatoshi J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We constructed three AI models based on still B-mode images: model-1 using 24,675 images, model-2 using 57,145 images, and model-3 using 70,950 images. A convolutional neural network was used to train the US images. The four-class liver tumor discrimination by AI, namely, cysts, hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic tumors, was examined. The accuracy of the AI diagnosis was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation. The diagnostic performances of the AI models and human experts were also compared using an independent test cohort of video images. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of model-1, model-2, and model-3 in the four tumor types are 86.8%, 91.0%, and 91.1%, whereas those for malignant tumor are 91.3%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. In the independent comparison of the AIs and physicians, the percentages of correct diagnoses (accuracies) by the AIs are 80.0%, 81.8%, and 89.1% in model-1, model-2, and model-3, respectively. Meanwhile, the median percentages of correct diagnoses are 67.3% (range 63.6%–69.1%) and 47.3% (45.5%–47.3%) by human experts and non-experts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The performance of the AI models surpassed that of human experts in the four-class discrimination and benign and malignant discrimination of liver tumors. Thus, the AI models can help prevent human errors in US diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9. Springer Singapore 2022-02-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8938378/ /pubmed/35220490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract Nishida, Naoshi Yamakawa, Makoto Shiina, Tsuyoshi Mekada, Yoshito Nishida, Mutsumi Sakamoto, Naoya Nishimura, Takashi Iijima, Hiroko Hirai, Toshiko Takahashi, Ken Sato, Masaya Tateishi, Ryosuke Ogawa, Masahiro Mori, Hideaki Kitano, Masayuki Toyoda, Hidenori Ogawa, Chikara Kudo, Masatoshi Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title | Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title_full | Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title_short | Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts |
title_sort | artificial intelligence (ai) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between ai and human experts |
topic | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishidanaoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT yamakawamakoto artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT shiinatsuyoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT mekadayoshito artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT nishidamutsumi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT sakamotonaoya artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT nishimuratakashi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT iijimahiroko artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT hiraitoshiko artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT takahashiken artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT satomasaya artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT tateishiryosuke artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT ogawamasahiro artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT morihideaki artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT kitanomasayuki artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT toyodahidenori artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT ogawachikara artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT kudomasatoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts AT artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts |