Cargando…

Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We construc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishida, Naoshi, Yamakawa, Makoto, Shiina, Tsuyoshi, Mekada, Yoshito, Nishida, Mutsumi, Sakamoto, Naoya, Nishimura, Takashi, Iijima, Hiroko, Hirai, Toshiko, Takahashi, Ken, Sato, Masaya, Tateishi, Ryosuke, Ogawa, Masahiro, Mori, Hideaki, Kitano, Masayuki, Toyoda, Hidenori, Ogawa, Chikara, Kudo, Masatoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9
_version_ 1784672541018685440
author Nishida, Naoshi
Yamakawa, Makoto
Shiina, Tsuyoshi
Mekada, Yoshito
Nishida, Mutsumi
Sakamoto, Naoya
Nishimura, Takashi
Iijima, Hiroko
Hirai, Toshiko
Takahashi, Ken
Sato, Masaya
Tateishi, Ryosuke
Ogawa, Masahiro
Mori, Hideaki
Kitano, Masayuki
Toyoda, Hidenori
Ogawa, Chikara
Kudo, Masatoshi
author_facet Nishida, Naoshi
Yamakawa, Makoto
Shiina, Tsuyoshi
Mekada, Yoshito
Nishida, Mutsumi
Sakamoto, Naoya
Nishimura, Takashi
Iijima, Hiroko
Hirai, Toshiko
Takahashi, Ken
Sato, Masaya
Tateishi, Ryosuke
Ogawa, Masahiro
Mori, Hideaki
Kitano, Masayuki
Toyoda, Hidenori
Ogawa, Chikara
Kudo, Masatoshi
author_sort Nishida, Naoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We constructed three AI models based on still B-mode images: model-1 using 24,675 images, model-2 using 57,145 images, and model-3 using 70,950 images. A convolutional neural network was used to train the US images. The four-class liver tumor discrimination by AI, namely, cysts, hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic tumors, was examined. The accuracy of the AI diagnosis was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation. The diagnostic performances of the AI models and human experts were also compared using an independent test cohort of video images. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of model-1, model-2, and model-3 in the four tumor types are 86.8%, 91.0%, and 91.1%, whereas those for malignant tumor are 91.3%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. In the independent comparison of the AIs and physicians, the percentages of correct diagnoses (accuracies) by the AIs are 80.0%, 81.8%, and 89.1% in model-1, model-2, and model-3, respectively. Meanwhile, the median percentages of correct diagnoses are 67.3% (range 63.6%–69.1%) and 47.3% (45.5%–47.3%) by human experts and non-experts, respectively. CONCLUSION:  The performance of the AI models surpassed that of human experts in the four-class discrimination and benign and malignant discrimination of liver tumors. Thus, the AI models can help prevent human errors in US diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8938378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89383782022-04-07 Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts Nishida, Naoshi Yamakawa, Makoto Shiina, Tsuyoshi Mekada, Yoshito Nishida, Mutsumi Sakamoto, Naoya Nishimura, Takashi Iijima, Hiroko Hirai, Toshiko Takahashi, Ken Sato, Masaya Tateishi, Ryosuke Ogawa, Masahiro Mori, Hideaki Kitano, Masayuki Toyoda, Hidenori Ogawa, Chikara Kudo, Masatoshi J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) is widely used for the diagnosis of liver tumors. However, the accuracy of the diagnosis largely depends on the visual perception of humans. Hence, we aimed to construct artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of liver tumors in US. METHODS: We constructed three AI models based on still B-mode images: model-1 using 24,675 images, model-2 using 57,145 images, and model-3 using 70,950 images. A convolutional neural network was used to train the US images. The four-class liver tumor discrimination by AI, namely, cysts, hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic tumors, was examined. The accuracy of the AI diagnosis was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation. The diagnostic performances of the AI models and human experts were also compared using an independent test cohort of video images. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of model-1, model-2, and model-3 in the four tumor types are 86.8%, 91.0%, and 91.1%, whereas those for malignant tumor are 91.3%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. In the independent comparison of the AIs and physicians, the percentages of correct diagnoses (accuracies) by the AIs are 80.0%, 81.8%, and 89.1% in model-1, model-2, and model-3, respectively. Meanwhile, the median percentages of correct diagnoses are 67.3% (range 63.6%–69.1%) and 47.3% (45.5%–47.3%) by human experts and non-experts, respectively. CONCLUSION:  The performance of the AI models surpassed that of human experts in the four-class discrimination and benign and malignant discrimination of liver tumors. Thus, the AI models can help prevent human errors in US diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9. Springer Singapore 2022-02-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8938378/ /pubmed/35220490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
Nishida, Naoshi
Yamakawa, Makoto
Shiina, Tsuyoshi
Mekada, Yoshito
Nishida, Mutsumi
Sakamoto, Naoya
Nishimura, Takashi
Iijima, Hiroko
Hirai, Toshiko
Takahashi, Ken
Sato, Masaya
Tateishi, Ryosuke
Ogawa, Masahiro
Mori, Hideaki
Kitano, Masayuki
Toyoda, Hidenori
Ogawa, Chikara
Kudo, Masatoshi
Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title_full Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title_short Artificial intelligence (AI) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between AI and human experts
title_sort artificial intelligence (ai) models for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of liver tumors and comparison of diagnostic accuracies between ai and human experts
topic Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-022-01849-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nishidanaoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT yamakawamakoto artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT shiinatsuyoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT mekadayoshito artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT nishidamutsumi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT sakamotonaoya artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT nishimuratakashi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT iijimahiroko artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT hiraitoshiko artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT takahashiken artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT satomasaya artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT tateishiryosuke artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT ogawamasahiro artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT morihideaki artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT kitanomasayuki artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT toyodahidenori artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT ogawachikara artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT kudomasatoshi artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts
AT artificialintelligenceaimodelsfortheultrasonographicdiagnosisoflivertumorsandcomparisonofdiagnosticaccuraciesbetweenaiandhumanexperts