Cargando…
How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performances of a commercialized artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) with those of emergency radiologists in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved retr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2 |
_version_ | 1784672579041099776 |
---|---|
author | Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Gorincour, Guillaume Nivet, Hubert May, Julien Seux, Mylene Calame, Paul Thomson, Vivien Delabrousse, Eric Crombé, Amandine |
author_facet | Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Gorincour, Guillaume Nivet, Hubert May, Julien Seux, Mylene Calame, Paul Thomson, Vivien Delabrousse, Eric Crombé, Amandine |
author_sort | Cheikh, Alexandre Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performances of a commercialized artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) with those of emergency radiologists in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved retrospective multicentric study including patients with suspected PE from September to December 2019 (i.e., during a preliminary evaluation period of an approved AI algorithm). CTPA quality and conclusions by emergency radiologists were retrieved from radiological reports. The gold standard was a retrospective review of CTPA, radiological and clinical reports, AI outputs, and patient outcomes. Diagnostic performance metrics for AI and radiologists were assessed in the entire cohort and depending on CTPA quality. RESULTS: Overall, 1202 patients were included (median age: 66.2 years). PE prevalence was 15.8% (190/1202). The AI algorithm detected 219 suspicious PEs, of which 176 were true PEs, including 19 true PEs missed by radiologists. In the cohort, the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPVs) were obtained with AI (92.6% versus 90% and 98.6% versus 98.1%, respectively), while the highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were found with radiologists (99.1% versus 95.8% and 95% versus 80.4%, respectively). Accuracy, specificity, and PPV were significantly higher for radiologists except in subcohorts with poor-to-average injection quality. Radiologists positively evaluated the AI algorithm to improve their diagnostic comfort (55/79 [69.6%]). CONCLUSION: Instead of replacing radiologists, AI for PE detection appears to be a safety net in emergency radiology practice due to high sensitivity and NPV, thereby increasing the self-confidence of radiologists. KEY POINTS: • Both the AI algorithm and emergency radiologists showed excellent performance in diagnosing PE on CTPA (sensitivity and specificity ≥ 90%; accuracy ≥ 95%). • The AI algorithm for PE detection can help increase the sensitivity and NPV of emergency radiologists in clinical practice, especially in cases of poor-to-moderate injection quality. • Emergency radiologists recommended the use of AI for PE detection in satisfaction surveys to increase their confidence and comfort in their final diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8938594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89385942022-03-22 How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Gorincour, Guillaume Nivet, Hubert May, Julien Seux, Mylene Calame, Paul Thomson, Vivien Delabrousse, Eric Crombé, Amandine Eur Radiol Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performances of a commercialized artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) with those of emergency radiologists in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved retrospective multicentric study including patients with suspected PE from September to December 2019 (i.e., during a preliminary evaluation period of an approved AI algorithm). CTPA quality and conclusions by emergency radiologists were retrieved from radiological reports. The gold standard was a retrospective review of CTPA, radiological and clinical reports, AI outputs, and patient outcomes. Diagnostic performance metrics for AI and radiologists were assessed in the entire cohort and depending on CTPA quality. RESULTS: Overall, 1202 patients were included (median age: 66.2 years). PE prevalence was 15.8% (190/1202). The AI algorithm detected 219 suspicious PEs, of which 176 were true PEs, including 19 true PEs missed by radiologists. In the cohort, the highest sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPVs) were obtained with AI (92.6% versus 90% and 98.6% versus 98.1%, respectively), while the highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were found with radiologists (99.1% versus 95.8% and 95% versus 80.4%, respectively). Accuracy, specificity, and PPV were significantly higher for radiologists except in subcohorts with poor-to-average injection quality. Radiologists positively evaluated the AI algorithm to improve their diagnostic comfort (55/79 [69.6%]). CONCLUSION: Instead of replacing radiologists, AI for PE detection appears to be a safety net in emergency radiology practice due to high sensitivity and NPV, thereby increasing the self-confidence of radiologists. KEY POINTS: • Both the AI algorithm and emergency radiologists showed excellent performance in diagnosing PE on CTPA (sensitivity and specificity ≥ 90%; accuracy ≥ 95%). • The AI algorithm for PE detection can help increase the sensitivity and NPV of emergency radiologists in clinical practice, especially in cases of poor-to-moderate injection quality. • Emergency radiologists recommended the use of AI for PE detection in satisfaction surveys to increase their confidence and comfort in their final diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8938594/ /pubmed/35316363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Gorincour, Guillaume Nivet, Hubert May, Julien Seux, Mylene Calame, Paul Thomson, Vivien Delabrousse, Eric Crombé, Amandine How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title | How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title_full | How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title_fullStr | How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title_full_unstemmed | How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title_short | How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
title_sort | how artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism |
topic | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35316363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheikhalexandreben howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT gorincourguillaume howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT nivethubert howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT mayjulien howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT seuxmylene howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT calamepaul howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT thomsonvivien howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT delabrousseeric howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism AT crombeamandine howartificialintelligenceimprovesradiologicalinterpretationinsuspectedpulmonaryembolism |