Cargando…

Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?

BACKGROUND: Bone graft extenders are being used more in spine surgery as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft. However, potential conflict of interest could impact average fusion rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fusion rates reported in the literature were different in pap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Garwin, Lee, Yu-Po, Lee, Joshua, Zhang, Noah, Oh, Michael, Rosen, Charles, Bhatia, Nitin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100112
_version_ 1784672581014519808
author Chin, Garwin
Lee, Yu-Po
Lee, Joshua
Zhang, Noah
Oh, Michael
Rosen, Charles
Bhatia, Nitin
author_facet Chin, Garwin
Lee, Yu-Po
Lee, Joshua
Zhang, Noah
Oh, Michael
Rosen, Charles
Bhatia, Nitin
author_sort Chin, Garwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone graft extenders are being used more in spine surgery as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft. However, potential conflict of interest could impact average fusion rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fusion rates reported in the literature were different in papers evaluating bone graft substitutes and extenders when there was potential conflict of interest versus no potential conflict of interest. METHODS: Pubmed was searched for studies evaluating fusion rates when bone graft extenders including demineralized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite, and tricalcium sulfate were used. Studies were screened for one or two level fusions and for degenerative spinal conditions. The average fusion rates of subgroups were compared using unpaired Student's t-tests. RESULTS: 1928 studies were evaluated. 86 studies were included in the study. The fusion rates varied from 4 to 100%. There were 24 studies with a potential conflict of interest and 62 studies with no conflict of interest. The average fusion rate of all the studies was 84.63% with standard deviation of 18.33%. The average fusion rates of those studies with conflict of interest was 80.93% versus 86.06% without conflict of interest. This was not statistically significant (p>0.07). The average fusion rate of studies evaluated by CT scan was 79.8% versus 87.9% without CT. The average fusion rate of studies that employed an independent reviewer to evaluate the fusion was 82.61% versus 85.63% for studies with no independent reviewer. CONCLUSION: There is a great variability in the reported fusion rates of bone graft extenders. Counter to expectations, average fusion rates were lower in the studies where there was a potential conflict of interest. The use of CT scans and an independent reviewer seem to account for the lower reported fusion rates, and may be a means of negating the potential conflicts of interest in fusion studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8938602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89386022022-03-23 Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders? Chin, Garwin Lee, Yu-Po Lee, Joshua Zhang, Noah Oh, Michael Rosen, Charles Bhatia, Nitin N Am Spine Soc J Systematic Reviews /Meta-analyses BACKGROUND: Bone graft extenders are being used more in spine surgery as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft. However, potential conflict of interest could impact average fusion rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fusion rates reported in the literature were different in papers evaluating bone graft substitutes and extenders when there was potential conflict of interest versus no potential conflict of interest. METHODS: Pubmed was searched for studies evaluating fusion rates when bone graft extenders including demineralized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite, and tricalcium sulfate were used. Studies were screened for one or two level fusions and for degenerative spinal conditions. The average fusion rates of subgroups were compared using unpaired Student's t-tests. RESULTS: 1928 studies were evaluated. 86 studies were included in the study. The fusion rates varied from 4 to 100%. There were 24 studies with a potential conflict of interest and 62 studies with no conflict of interest. The average fusion rate of all the studies was 84.63% with standard deviation of 18.33%. The average fusion rates of those studies with conflict of interest was 80.93% versus 86.06% without conflict of interest. This was not statistically significant (p>0.07). The average fusion rate of studies evaluated by CT scan was 79.8% versus 87.9% without CT. The average fusion rate of studies that employed an independent reviewer to evaluate the fusion was 82.61% versus 85.63% for studies with no independent reviewer. CONCLUSION: There is a great variability in the reported fusion rates of bone graft extenders. Counter to expectations, average fusion rates were lower in the studies where there was a potential conflict of interest. The use of CT scans and an independent reviewer seem to account for the lower reported fusion rates, and may be a means of negating the potential conflicts of interest in fusion studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Elsevier 2022-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8938602/ /pubmed/35330662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100112 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of North American Spine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews /Meta-analyses
Chin, Garwin
Lee, Yu-Po
Lee, Joshua
Zhang, Noah
Oh, Michael
Rosen, Charles
Bhatia, Nitin
Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title_full Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title_fullStr Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title_full_unstemmed Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title_short Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
title_sort does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?
topic Systematic Reviews /Meta-analyses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100112
work_keys_str_mv AT chingarwin doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT leeyupo doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT leejoshua doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT zhangnoah doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT ohmichael doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT rosencharles doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders
AT bhatianitin doesconflictofinterestaffectthereportedfusionratesofbonegraftsubstitutesandextenders