Cargando…

Carvedilol versus propranolol in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis: Efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Beta blockers combined with endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the most effective means for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. No data are available on the efficacy of carvedilol in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razafindrazoto, Chantelli Iamblaudiot, Razafindrabekoto, Lova Dany Ella, Hasina Laingonirina, Domoina Harivonjy, Raveloson, Raveloson, Rasolonjatovo, Anjaramalala Sitraka, Rakotozafindrabe, Andry Lalaina Rinà, Rabenjanahary, Tovo Harimanana, Razafimahefa, Soloniaina Hélio, Ramanampamonjy, Rado Manitrala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12721
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Beta blockers combined with endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the most effective means for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. No data are available on the efficacy of carvedilol in the secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol compared to propranolol as secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized study over a period of 14 months from February 2019 to March 2020. All patients with portal hypertension due to schistosomiasis with at least one episode of variceal bleeding were included and randomized to the propranolol and carvedilol groups. EVL protocol was continued in both groups. RESULTS: Sixty‐one patients were eligible and randomized to propranolol (n = 30) and carvedilol (n = 31) groups. There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic recurrence between the carvedilol (n = 1) and propranolol (n = 3) groups (3.33 vs 10%; P = 0.30). At 4 months, there was a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (−4.13 mm Hg; 95% CI: −6.27 to −1.99; P < 0.05) and heart rate (−12.13 bpm; 95% CI: −13.92 to −10.35; P < 0.05) in the carvedilol group. There was no significant difference between the groups on the mean difference in arterial pressure. One patient in the carvedilol group had breathing difficulty. There were no adverse events in the propranolol group. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the efficacy between carvedilol and propranolol. Carvedilol may be an alternative to propranolol for secondary prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.