Cargando…

Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol

Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron ox...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Driessen, Daphne A. J. J., de Gouw, Didi J. J. M., Stijns, Rutger C. H., Litjens, Geke, Israël, Bas, Philips, Bart W. J., Hermans, John J., Dijkema, Tim, Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R., van der Post, Rachel S., Nagtegaal, Iris D., van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H., Brosens, Lodewijk A. A., Veltien, Andor, Zámecnik, Patrik, Scheenen, Tom W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024
_version_ 1784672629173518336
author Driessen, Daphne A. J. J.
de Gouw, Didi J. J. M.
Stijns, Rutger C. H.
Litjens, Geke
Israël, Bas
Philips, Bart W. J.
Hermans, John J.
Dijkema, Tim
Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
van der Post, Rachel S.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H.
Brosens, Lodewijk A. A.
Veltien, Andor
Zámecnik, Patrik
Scheenen, Tom W. J.
author_facet Driessen, Daphne A. J. J.
de Gouw, Didi J. J. M.
Stijns, Rutger C. H.
Litjens, Geke
Israël, Bas
Philips, Bart W. J.
Hermans, John J.
Dijkema, Tim
Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
van der Post, Rachel S.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H.
Brosens, Lodewijk A. A.
Veltien, Andor
Zámecnik, Patrik
Scheenen, Tom W. J.
author_sort Driessen, Daphne A. J. J.
collection PubMed
description Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this method needs validation. Here, a workflow is presented, which is designed to compare MRI-visible lymph nodes on a node-to-node basis with histopathology. Methods: In patients with prostate, rectal, periampullary, esophageal, and head-and-neck cancer, in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI was performed to detect lymph nodes suspicious of harboring metastases. After lymphadenectomy, but before histopathological assessment, a 7 Tesla preclinical ex vivo MRI of the surgical specimen was performed, and in vivo MR images were radiologically matched to ex vivo MR images. Lymph nodes were annotated on the ex vivo MRI for an MR-guided pathological examination of the specimens. Results: Matching lymph nodes of ex vivo MRI to pathology was feasible in all cancer types. The annotated ex vivo MR images enabled a comparison between USPIO-enhanced in vivo MRI and histopathology, which allowed for analyses on a nodal, or at least on a nodal station, basis. Conclusions: A workflow was developed to validate in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI with histopathology. Guiding the pathologist towards lymph nodes in the resection specimens during histopathological work-up allowed for the analysis at a nodal basis, or at least nodal station basis, of in vivo suspicious lymph nodes with corresponding histopathology, providing direct information for validation of in vivo USPIO-enhanced, MRI-detected lymph nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8938816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89388162022-03-23 Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. de Gouw, Didi J. J. M. Stijns, Rutger C. H. Litjens, Geke Israël, Bas Philips, Bart W. J. Hermans, John J. Dijkema, Tim Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R. van der Post, Rachel S. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H. Brosens, Lodewijk A. A. Veltien, Andor Zámecnik, Patrik Scheenen, Tom W. J. Methods Protoc Article Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this method needs validation. Here, a workflow is presented, which is designed to compare MRI-visible lymph nodes on a node-to-node basis with histopathology. Methods: In patients with prostate, rectal, periampullary, esophageal, and head-and-neck cancer, in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI was performed to detect lymph nodes suspicious of harboring metastases. After lymphadenectomy, but before histopathological assessment, a 7 Tesla preclinical ex vivo MRI of the surgical specimen was performed, and in vivo MR images were radiologically matched to ex vivo MR images. Lymph nodes were annotated on the ex vivo MRI for an MR-guided pathological examination of the specimens. Results: Matching lymph nodes of ex vivo MRI to pathology was feasible in all cancer types. The annotated ex vivo MR images enabled a comparison between USPIO-enhanced in vivo MRI and histopathology, which allowed for analyses on a nodal, or at least on a nodal station, basis. Conclusions: A workflow was developed to validate in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI with histopathology. Guiding the pathologist towards lymph nodes in the resection specimens during histopathological work-up allowed for the analysis at a nodal basis, or at least nodal station basis, of in vivo suspicious lymph nodes with corresponding histopathology, providing direct information for validation of in vivo USPIO-enhanced, MRI-detected lymph nodes. MDPI 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8938816/ /pubmed/35314661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Driessen, Daphne A. J. J.
de Gouw, Didi J. J. M.
Stijns, Rutger C. H.
Litjens, Geke
Israël, Bas
Philips, Bart W. J.
Hermans, John J.
Dijkema, Tim
Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
van der Post, Rachel S.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H.
Brosens, Lodewijk A. A.
Veltien, Andor
Zámecnik, Patrik
Scheenen, Tom W. J.
Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title_full Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title_fullStr Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title_short Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
title_sort validation of in vivo nodal assessment of solid malignancies with uspio-enhanced mri: a workflow protocol
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024
work_keys_str_mv AT driessendaphneajj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT degouwdidijjm validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT stijnsrutgerch validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT litjensgeke validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT israelbas validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT philipsbartwj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT hermansjohnj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT dijkematim validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT klarenbeekbastiaanr validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT vanderpostrachels validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT nagtegaalirisd validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT vanengenvangrunsvenadrianach validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT brosenslodewijkaa validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT veltienandor validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT zamecnikpatrik validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol
AT scheenentomwj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol