Cargando…
Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol
Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron ox...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024 |
_version_ | 1784672629173518336 |
---|---|
author | Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. de Gouw, Didi J. J. M. Stijns, Rutger C. H. Litjens, Geke Israël, Bas Philips, Bart W. J. Hermans, John J. Dijkema, Tim Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R. van der Post, Rachel S. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H. Brosens, Lodewijk A. A. Veltien, Andor Zámecnik, Patrik Scheenen, Tom W. J. |
author_facet | Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. de Gouw, Didi J. J. M. Stijns, Rutger C. H. Litjens, Geke Israël, Bas Philips, Bart W. J. Hermans, John J. Dijkema, Tim Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R. van der Post, Rachel S. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H. Brosens, Lodewijk A. A. Veltien, Andor Zámecnik, Patrik Scheenen, Tom W. J. |
author_sort | Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this method needs validation. Here, a workflow is presented, which is designed to compare MRI-visible lymph nodes on a node-to-node basis with histopathology. Methods: In patients with prostate, rectal, periampullary, esophageal, and head-and-neck cancer, in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI was performed to detect lymph nodes suspicious of harboring metastases. After lymphadenectomy, but before histopathological assessment, a 7 Tesla preclinical ex vivo MRI of the surgical specimen was performed, and in vivo MR images were radiologically matched to ex vivo MR images. Lymph nodes were annotated on the ex vivo MRI for an MR-guided pathological examination of the specimens. Results: Matching lymph nodes of ex vivo MRI to pathology was feasible in all cancer types. The annotated ex vivo MR images enabled a comparison between USPIO-enhanced in vivo MRI and histopathology, which allowed for analyses on a nodal, or at least on a nodal station, basis. Conclusions: A workflow was developed to validate in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI with histopathology. Guiding the pathologist towards lymph nodes in the resection specimens during histopathological work-up allowed for the analysis at a nodal basis, or at least nodal station basis, of in vivo suspicious lymph nodes with corresponding histopathology, providing direct information for validation of in vivo USPIO-enhanced, MRI-detected lymph nodes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8938816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89388162022-03-23 Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. de Gouw, Didi J. J. M. Stijns, Rutger C. H. Litjens, Geke Israël, Bas Philips, Bart W. J. Hermans, John J. Dijkema, Tim Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R. van der Post, Rachel S. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H. Brosens, Lodewijk A. A. Veltien, Andor Zámecnik, Patrik Scheenen, Tom W. J. Methods Protoc Article Background: In various cancer types, the first step towards extended metastatic disease is the presence of lymph node metastases. Imaging methods with sufficient diagnostic accuracy are required to personalize treatment. Lymph node metastases can be detected with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but this method needs validation. Here, a workflow is presented, which is designed to compare MRI-visible lymph nodes on a node-to-node basis with histopathology. Methods: In patients with prostate, rectal, periampullary, esophageal, and head-and-neck cancer, in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI was performed to detect lymph nodes suspicious of harboring metastases. After lymphadenectomy, but before histopathological assessment, a 7 Tesla preclinical ex vivo MRI of the surgical specimen was performed, and in vivo MR images were radiologically matched to ex vivo MR images. Lymph nodes were annotated on the ex vivo MRI for an MR-guided pathological examination of the specimens. Results: Matching lymph nodes of ex vivo MRI to pathology was feasible in all cancer types. The annotated ex vivo MR images enabled a comparison between USPIO-enhanced in vivo MRI and histopathology, which allowed for analyses on a nodal, or at least on a nodal station, basis. Conclusions: A workflow was developed to validate in vivo USPIO-enhanced MRI with histopathology. Guiding the pathologist towards lymph nodes in the resection specimens during histopathological work-up allowed for the analysis at a nodal basis, or at least nodal station basis, of in vivo suspicious lymph nodes with corresponding histopathology, providing direct information for validation of in vivo USPIO-enhanced, MRI-detected lymph nodes. MDPI 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8938816/ /pubmed/35314661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Driessen, Daphne A. J. J. de Gouw, Didi J. J. M. Stijns, Rutger C. H. Litjens, Geke Israël, Bas Philips, Bart W. J. Hermans, John J. Dijkema, Tim Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R. van der Post, Rachel S. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Engen-van Grunsven, Adriana C. H. Brosens, Lodewijk A. A. Veltien, Andor Zámecnik, Patrik Scheenen, Tom W. J. Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title | Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title_full | Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title_fullStr | Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title_short | Validation of In Vivo Nodal Assessment of Solid Malignancies with USPIO-Enhanced MRI: A Workflow Protocol |
title_sort | validation of in vivo nodal assessment of solid malignancies with uspio-enhanced mri: a workflow protocol |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8938816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps5020024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT driessendaphneajj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT degouwdidijjm validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT stijnsrutgerch validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT litjensgeke validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT israelbas validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT philipsbartwj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT hermansjohnj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT dijkematim validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT klarenbeekbastiaanr validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT vanderpostrachels validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT nagtegaalirisd validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT vanengenvangrunsvenadrianach validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT brosenslodewijkaa validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT veltienandor validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT zamecnikpatrik validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol AT scheenentomwj validationofinvivonodalassessmentofsolidmalignancieswithuspioenhancedmriaworkflowprotocol |