Cargando…

Kinetics of immune responses to the AZD1222/Covishield vaccine with varying dose intervals in Sri Lankan individuals

BACKGROUND: To understand the kinetics of immune responses with different dosing gaps of the AZD1222 vaccine, we compared antibody and T cell responses in two cohorts with two different dosing gaps. METHODS: Antibodies to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus were assessed in 297 individuals with a dosing gap of 12...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeewandara, Chandima, Aberathna, Inoka Sepali, Gomes, Laksiri, Pushpakumara, Pradeep Darshana, Danasekara, Saubhagya, Guruge, Dinuka, Ranasinghe, Thushali, Gunasekera, Banuri, Kamaladasa, Achala, Kuruppu, Heshan, Somathilake, Gayasha, Dissanayake, Osanda, Gamalath, Nayanathara, Ekanayake, Dinithi, Jayamali, Jeewantha, Jayathilaka, Deshni, Mudunkotuwa, Anushika, Harvie, Michael, Nimasha, Thashmi, Wijayamuni, Ruwan, Schimanski, Lisa, Rijal, Pramila, Tan, Tiong K., Dong, Tao, Townsend, Alain, Ogg, Graham S., Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35349749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.592
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To understand the kinetics of immune responses with different dosing gaps of the AZD1222 vaccine, we compared antibody and T cell responses in two cohorts with two different dosing gaps. METHODS: Antibodies to the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus were assessed in 297 individuals with a dosing gap of 12 weeks, sampled 12 weeks post second dose (cohort 1) and in 77 individuals with a median dosing gap of 21.4 weeks (cohort 2) sampled 6 weeks post second dose. ACE2‐blocking antibodies (ACE2‐blocking Abs), antibodies to the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of  variants of concern (VOC), and ex vivo T cell responses were assessed in a subcohort. RESULTS: All individuals (100%) had SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific total antibodies and 94.2% of cohort 1 and 97.1% of cohort 2 had ACE2‐blocking Abs. There was no difference in antibody titers or positivity rates in different age groups in both cohorts. The ACE2‐blocking Abs (p < .0001) and antibodies to the RBD of the VOCs were significantly higher in cohort 2 compared to cohort 1. 41.2% to 65.8% of different age groups gave a positive response by the hemagglutination assay to the RBD of the ancestral virus and VOCs in cohort 1, while 53.6%–90% gave a positive response in cohort 2. 17/57 (29.8%) of cohort 1 and 17/29 (58.6%) of cohort 2 had ex vivo interferon (IFN)γ ELISpot responses above the positive threshold. The ACE2‐blocking antibodies (Spearman's r = .46, p = .008) and ex vivo IFNγ responses (Spearman's r = .71, p < .0001) at 12 weeks post first dose, significantly correlated with levels 12 weeks post second dose. CONCLUSIONS: Both dosing schedules resulted in high antibody and T cell responses post vaccination, although those with a longer dosing gap had a higher magnitude of responses, possibly as immune responses were measured 6 weeks post second dose compared to 12 weeks post second dose.