Cargando…

Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) and copper intrauterine devices (Cu-IUDs) offer long-acting contraception; however, some women may discontinue use within the first year due to bleeding pattern changes, limiting their potential. This systematic literature review in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costescu, Dustin, Chawla, Rajinder, Hughes, Rowena, Teal, Stephanie, Merz, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01657-6
_version_ 1784672674754068480
author Costescu, Dustin
Chawla, Rajinder
Hughes, Rowena
Teal, Stephanie
Merz, Martin
author_facet Costescu, Dustin
Chawla, Rajinder
Hughes, Rowena
Teal, Stephanie
Merz, Martin
author_sort Costescu, Dustin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) and copper intrauterine devices (Cu-IUDs) offer long-acting contraception; however, some women may discontinue use within the first year due to bleeding pattern changes, limiting their potential. This systematic literature review investigated whether differences in bleeding profiles influence continuation rates in women in America, Europe and Australia. METHODS: Searches performed in PubMed and Embase were screened to identify publications describing bleeding patterns and rates of early IUC removal/discontinuation or continuation, descriptions of bleeding patterns, reasons for discontinuation, and patient satisfaction, acceptability and tolerability for LNG-IUDs and Cu-IUDs published between January 2010 and December 2019. The results were further restricted to capture citations related to ‘Humans’ and ‘Females’. The review was limited to studies published from 2010 onwards, as changing attitudes over time mean that results of studies performed before this date may not be generalizable to current practice. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications describing 41 studies performed principally in the USA (n = 17) and Europe (n = 13) were identified. Publications describing bleeding patterns in LNG-IUD users (n = 11) consistently observed a reduction in bleeding in most women, whereas two of three studies in Cu-IUD users reported heavy bleeding in approximately 40% of patients. Rates of discontinuation for both devices ranged widely and may be as high as 50% but were lower for LNG-IUDs versus Cu-IUDs. Discontinuation rates due to bleeding were consistently higher for Cu-IUDs versus LNG-IUDs. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is a common reason for discontinuation of Cu-IUDs and LNG-IUDs. The more favourable bleeding pattern observed in LNG-IUD users may be associated with a lower rate of early discontinuation of LNG-IUDs versus Cu-IUDs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01657-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8939098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89390982022-03-23 Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review Costescu, Dustin Chawla, Rajinder Hughes, Rowena Teal, Stephanie Merz, Martin BMC Womens Health Research OBJECTIVE: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) and copper intrauterine devices (Cu-IUDs) offer long-acting contraception; however, some women may discontinue use within the first year due to bleeding pattern changes, limiting their potential. This systematic literature review investigated whether differences in bleeding profiles influence continuation rates in women in America, Europe and Australia. METHODS: Searches performed in PubMed and Embase were screened to identify publications describing bleeding patterns and rates of early IUC removal/discontinuation or continuation, descriptions of bleeding patterns, reasons for discontinuation, and patient satisfaction, acceptability and tolerability for LNG-IUDs and Cu-IUDs published between January 2010 and December 2019. The results were further restricted to capture citations related to ‘Humans’ and ‘Females’. The review was limited to studies published from 2010 onwards, as changing attitudes over time mean that results of studies performed before this date may not be generalizable to current practice. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications describing 41 studies performed principally in the USA (n = 17) and Europe (n = 13) were identified. Publications describing bleeding patterns in LNG-IUD users (n = 11) consistently observed a reduction in bleeding in most women, whereas two of three studies in Cu-IUD users reported heavy bleeding in approximately 40% of patients. Rates of discontinuation for both devices ranged widely and may be as high as 50% but were lower for LNG-IUDs versus Cu-IUDs. Discontinuation rates due to bleeding were consistently higher for Cu-IUDs versus LNG-IUDs. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is a common reason for discontinuation of Cu-IUDs and LNG-IUDs. The more favourable bleeding pattern observed in LNG-IUD users may be associated with a lower rate of early discontinuation of LNG-IUDs versus Cu-IUDs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01657-6. BioMed Central 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8939098/ /pubmed/35313863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01657-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Costescu, Dustin
Chawla, Rajinder
Hughes, Rowena
Teal, Stephanie
Merz, Martin
Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title_full Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title_fullStr Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title_short Discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
title_sort discontinuation rates of intrauterine contraception due to unfavourable bleeding: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35313863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01657-6
work_keys_str_mv AT costescudustin discontinuationratesofintrauterinecontraceptionduetounfavourablebleedingasystematicreview
AT chawlarajinder discontinuationratesofintrauterinecontraceptionduetounfavourablebleedingasystematicreview
AT hughesrowena discontinuationratesofintrauterinecontraceptionduetounfavourablebleedingasystematicreview
AT tealstephanie discontinuationratesofintrauterinecontraceptionduetounfavourablebleedingasystematicreview
AT merzmartin discontinuationratesofintrauterinecontraceptionduetounfavourablebleedingasystematicreview