Cargando…

One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda

This article introduces the Parasite issue dedicated to part of the research in social sciences supported by the Domaine d’Intérêt Majeur de la Région Île-de-France (DIM) One Health [2016–2022]. We show how the four papers of this special issue are related. Jérôme Michalon recalls the genealogy of O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estebanez, Jean, Boireau, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35315768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2022014
_version_ 1784672708134436864
author Estebanez, Jean
Boireau, Pascal
author_facet Estebanez, Jean
Boireau, Pascal
author_sort Estebanez, Jean
collection PubMed
description This article introduces the Parasite issue dedicated to part of the research in social sciences supported by the Domaine d’Intérêt Majeur de la Région Île-de-France (DIM) One Health [2016–2022]. We show how the four papers of this special issue are related. Jérôme Michalon recalls the genealogy of One Health and analyzes it as an “epistemic watchword”. Using antibiotic resistance as a case study, Estera Badau demonstrates how “One Health” results from a series of formulas and the bringing together of a plurality of fields and actors. Nicolas Lainé and Serge Morand show how One Health fits in with attempts already initiated in the colonial period and context. They highlight the need to (re)legitimize local and non-human knowledge, in order to truly decolonize One Health and better prevent epidemic emergence. Finally, Frédéric Keck, Nicolas Lainé, Arnaud Morvan and Sandrine Ruhlmann show how zoonotic reservoir and cultural practices are linked in the context of three specific societies. This paper highlights two main contributions of social sciences: 1) To think about One Health genealogy, how the question is framed and by which actors. The questions of practices, social representations but also of the environment are less present than the issues of human and animal medicine. The Anthropocene, the Capitalocene, even some of its variations such as the “domesticoscene” thus appear to be key elements. 2) To propose methods and tools that make One Health operational, advocating a less asymmetrical view of types of knowledge (scientific, local, non-human) and more contextualized global health recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8939297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89392972022-04-11 One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda Estebanez, Jean Boireau, Pascal Parasite Review Article This article introduces the Parasite issue dedicated to part of the research in social sciences supported by the Domaine d’Intérêt Majeur de la Région Île-de-France (DIM) One Health [2016–2022]. We show how the four papers of this special issue are related. Jérôme Michalon recalls the genealogy of One Health and analyzes it as an “epistemic watchword”. Using antibiotic resistance as a case study, Estera Badau demonstrates how “One Health” results from a series of formulas and the bringing together of a plurality of fields and actors. Nicolas Lainé and Serge Morand show how One Health fits in with attempts already initiated in the colonial period and context. They highlight the need to (re)legitimize local and non-human knowledge, in order to truly decolonize One Health and better prevent epidemic emergence. Finally, Frédéric Keck, Nicolas Lainé, Arnaud Morvan and Sandrine Ruhlmann show how zoonotic reservoir and cultural practices are linked in the context of three specific societies. This paper highlights two main contributions of social sciences: 1) To think about One Health genealogy, how the question is framed and by which actors. The questions of practices, social representations but also of the environment are less present than the issues of human and animal medicine. The Anthropocene, the Capitalocene, even some of its variations such as the “domesticoscene” thus appear to be key elements. 2) To propose methods and tools that make One Health operational, advocating a less asymmetrical view of types of knowledge (scientific, local, non-human) and more contextualized global health recommendations. EDP Sciences 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8939297/ /pubmed/35315768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2022014 Text en © J. Estebanez & P. Boireau, published by EDP Sciences, 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Estebanez, Jean
Boireau, Pascal
One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title_full One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title_fullStr One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title_full_unstemmed One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title_short One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda
title_sort one health: a social science discussion of a global agenda
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35315768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2022014
work_keys_str_mv AT estebanezjean onehealthasocialsciencediscussionofaglobalagenda
AT boireaupascal onehealthasocialsciencediscussionofaglobalagenda