Cargando…
A memory-interference versus the “dud”-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition
Memory interference theories hold that exposure to more similar information to a target item impairs memory of the target item. The dud effect refers to the finding in eyewitness lineup identification that fillers dissimilar to the suspect cause more false identification of the suspect than similar...
Autores principales: | Jou, Jerwen, Hwang, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8939492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02083-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
False Memory ≠ False Memory: DRM Errors Are Unrelated to the Misinformation Effect
por: Ost, James, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Effects of post-encoding stress on performance in the DRM false memory paradigm
por: Pardilla-Delgado, Enmanuelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Adaptive false memory: Imagining future scenarios increases false memories in the DRM paradigm
por: Dewhurst, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task
por: Marini, Maddalena, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Encoding variability accounts for false recognition of noncorresponding lures on the forced-choice Mnemonic Similarity Task
por: Rollins, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)