Cargando…

PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice

The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villanueva, Vicente, D’Souza, Wendyl, Goji, Hiroko, Kim, Dong Wook, Liguori, Claudio, McMurray, Rob, Najm, Imad, Santamarina, Estevo, Steinhoff, Bernhard J., Vlasov, Pavel, Wu, Tony, Trinka, Eugen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y
_version_ 1784672976181919744
author Villanueva, Vicente
D’Souza, Wendyl
Goji, Hiroko
Kim, Dong Wook
Liguori, Claudio
McMurray, Rob
Najm, Imad
Santamarina, Estevo
Steinhoff, Bernhard J.
Vlasov, Pavel
Wu, Tony
Trinka, Eugen
author_facet Villanueva, Vicente
D’Souza, Wendyl
Goji, Hiroko
Kim, Dong Wook
Liguori, Claudio
McMurray, Rob
Najm, Imad
Santamarina, Estevo
Steinhoff, Bernhard J.
Vlasov, Pavel
Wu, Tony
Trinka, Eugen
author_sort Villanueva, Vicente
collection PubMed
description The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8940799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89407992022-04-07 PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice Villanueva, Vicente D’Souza, Wendyl Goji, Hiroko Kim, Dong Wook Liguori, Claudio McMurray, Rob Najm, Imad Santamarina, Estevo Steinhoff, Bernhard J. Vlasov, Pavel Wu, Tony Trinka, Eugen J Neurol Original Communication The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8940799/ /pubmed/34427754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Villanueva, Vicente
D’Souza, Wendyl
Goji, Hiroko
Kim, Dong Wook
Liguori, Claudio
McMurray, Rob
Najm, Imad
Santamarina, Estevo
Steinhoff, Bernhard J.
Vlasov, Pavel
Wu, Tony
Trinka, Eugen
PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title_full PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title_fullStr PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title_short PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
title_sort permit study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y
work_keys_str_mv AT villanuevavicente permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT dsouzawendyl permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT gojihiroko permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT kimdongwook permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT liguoriclaudio permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT mcmurrayrob permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT najmimad permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT santamarinaestevo permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT steinhoffbernhardj permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT vlasovpavel permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT wutony permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT trinkaeugen permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice
AT permitstudyaglobalpooledanalysisstudyoftheeffectivenessandtolerabilityofperampanelinroutineclinicalpractice