Cargando…
Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the craniofacial and aesthetic characteristics of adult metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis patients operated on in early childhood compared to controls. The goal was to find objective measurements that would correlate with the patient’s subjective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05434-y |
_version_ | 1784672986821820416 |
---|---|
author | Svalina, Anja Vuollo, Ville Serlo, Willy Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Silvola, Anna-Sofia Salokorpi, Niina |
author_facet | Svalina, Anja Vuollo, Ville Serlo, Willy Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Silvola, Anna-Sofia Salokorpi, Niina |
author_sort | Svalina, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the craniofacial and aesthetic characteristics of adult metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis patients operated on in early childhood compared to controls. The goal was to find objective measurements that would correlate with the patient’s subjective self-evaluation of their own cosmetic appearance. METHODS: The study population consisted of 49 patients from whom 41 had premature fusion of the sagittal and in 8 of metopic suture. There were 65 age and gender matching controls from The Finish National Register. The 3D photogrammetric models were created from all patients and controls. The images were analysed using Rapidform 2006. Facial landmarks were set by the standard Farkas points. Facial symmetry parameters were calculated by using the landmarks and the mirror shell of the face. Aesthetic evaluation was done from standard photographs using panels. Subjective satisfaction with one’s own appearance was evaluated using questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients had the greatest asymmetry in the forehead area when compared to controls (symmetry percentage 59% versus 66%, p = 0.013). In the control group, the gap between the eyes was smaller than in the case group, resulting in an absolute 2 mm difference (p = 0.003). The area of the chin and the landmarks were more located on the left side in the patient group, resulting in up to a 1.1 mm difference between the groups (p = 0.003). Only a weak association was found between craniofacial symmetry and appearance evaluations. CONCLUSION: Patients operated on because of sagittal and metopic synostoses were found to have facial asymmetry at long follow-up. However, the differences were < 3 mm and not clinically important. The long-term aesthetical outcome of the surgery performed because of sagittal or metopic craniosynostosis based on the 3D image evaluation was good. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8940850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89408502022-04-07 Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging Svalina, Anja Vuollo, Ville Serlo, Willy Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Silvola, Anna-Sofia Salokorpi, Niina Childs Nerv Syst Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the craniofacial and aesthetic characteristics of adult metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis patients operated on in early childhood compared to controls. The goal was to find objective measurements that would correlate with the patient’s subjective self-evaluation of their own cosmetic appearance. METHODS: The study population consisted of 49 patients from whom 41 had premature fusion of the sagittal and in 8 of metopic suture. There were 65 age and gender matching controls from The Finish National Register. The 3D photogrammetric models were created from all patients and controls. The images were analysed using Rapidform 2006. Facial landmarks were set by the standard Farkas points. Facial symmetry parameters were calculated by using the landmarks and the mirror shell of the face. Aesthetic evaluation was done from standard photographs using panels. Subjective satisfaction with one’s own appearance was evaluated using questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients had the greatest asymmetry in the forehead area when compared to controls (symmetry percentage 59% versus 66%, p = 0.013). In the control group, the gap between the eyes was smaller than in the case group, resulting in an absolute 2 mm difference (p = 0.003). The area of the chin and the landmarks were more located on the left side in the patient group, resulting in up to a 1.1 mm difference between the groups (p = 0.003). Only a weak association was found between craniofacial symmetry and appearance evaluations. CONCLUSION: Patients operated on because of sagittal and metopic synostoses were found to have facial asymmetry at long follow-up. However, the differences were < 3 mm and not clinically important. The long-term aesthetical outcome of the surgery performed because of sagittal or metopic craniosynostosis based on the 3D image evaluation was good. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8940850/ /pubmed/34940889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05434-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Svalina, Anja Vuollo, Ville Serlo, Willy Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko Silvola, Anna-Sofia Salokorpi, Niina Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title | Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title_full | Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title_fullStr | Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title_short | Craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3D photogrammetric imaging |
title_sort | craniofacial characteristics and cosmetic satisfaction of patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis: a case–control study using 3d photogrammetric imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05434-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svalinaanja craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging AT vuolloville craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging AT serlowilly craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging AT sinikumpujuhajaakko craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging AT silvolaannasofia craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging AT salokorpiniina craniofacialcharacteristicsandcosmeticsatisfactionofpatientswithsagittalandmetopicsynostosisacasecontrolstudyusing3dphotogrammetricimaging |