Cargando…
The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study
Background General practice in the UK is experiencing a crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working is a potential solution. The new general practice contract in Scotland encourages this and includes a new pharmacotherapy service to be delivered by General Practice Clinical Pharmacists (GPCPs). Consen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8941365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7 |
_version_ | 1784673093600411648 |
---|---|
author | Earle-Payne, Katie Forsyth, Paul Johnson, Chris F. Harrison, Heather Robertson, Susan Weidmann, Anita E. |
author_facet | Earle-Payne, Katie Forsyth, Paul Johnson, Chris F. Harrison, Heather Robertson, Susan Weidmann, Anita E. |
author_sort | Earle-Payne, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background General practice in the UK is experiencing a crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working is a potential solution. The new general practice contract in Scotland encourages this and includes a new pharmacotherapy service to be delivered by General Practice Clinical Pharmacists (GPCPs). Consensus is lacking for the standards of practice for delivery of pharmacotherapy medication reviews (which are polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews) as part of this service. Aim To identify and validate standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease medication (pharmacotherapy level 3) reviews conducted by GPCPs. Method A two-phased mixed-methods consensus methodology was used. Phase 1: An expert group of GPCPs (n = 4) and clinical pharmacist managers (n = 2) responsible for delivering the pharmacotherapy service used a Modified Nominal Group Technique to generate potential standards. Phase 2: Two-round Delphi survey involving GPCPs with ≥ 1 year of experience of working in general practice (n = 159). Results The expert group identified 44 potential standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease reviews. Practicing GPCPs indicated during the Delphi phase that the 44 standards were applicable to practice. The standards of practice covered seven main categories: skills, environment, qualifications, qualities and behaviours, knowledge, process and experience. Conclusion Practicing GPCPs indicated that the standards identified by the expert group are acceptable and valid for current practice and the delivery of polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews. The application of these standards to practice may help GPCPs and general practices to ensure equitable delivery of patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8941365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89413652022-03-23 The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study Earle-Payne, Katie Forsyth, Paul Johnson, Chris F. Harrison, Heather Robertson, Susan Weidmann, Anita E. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background General practice in the UK is experiencing a crisis. Greater multidisciplinary working is a potential solution. The new general practice contract in Scotland encourages this and includes a new pharmacotherapy service to be delivered by General Practice Clinical Pharmacists (GPCPs). Consensus is lacking for the standards of practice for delivery of pharmacotherapy medication reviews (which are polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews) as part of this service. Aim To identify and validate standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease medication (pharmacotherapy level 3) reviews conducted by GPCPs. Method A two-phased mixed-methods consensus methodology was used. Phase 1: An expert group of GPCPs (n = 4) and clinical pharmacist managers (n = 2) responsible for delivering the pharmacotherapy service used a Modified Nominal Group Technique to generate potential standards. Phase 2: Two-round Delphi survey involving GPCPs with ≥ 1 year of experience of working in general practice (n = 159). Results The expert group identified 44 potential standards of practice for polypharmacy and chronic disease reviews. Practicing GPCPs indicated during the Delphi phase that the 44 standards were applicable to practice. The standards of practice covered seven main categories: skills, environment, qualifications, qualities and behaviours, knowledge, process and experience. Conclusion Practicing GPCPs indicated that the standards identified by the expert group are acceptable and valid for current practice and the delivery of polypharmacy and chronic medication reviews. The application of these standards to practice may help GPCPs and general practices to ensure equitable delivery of patient care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8941365/ /pubmed/35320485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Earle-Payne, Katie Forsyth, Paul Johnson, Chris F. Harrison, Heather Robertson, Susan Weidmann, Anita E. The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title | The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title_full | The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title_fullStr | The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title_short | The standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
title_sort | standards of practice for delivery of polypharmacy and chronic disease medication reviews by general practice clinical pharmacists: a consensus study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8941365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01387-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT earlepaynekatie thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT forsythpaul thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT johnsonchrisf thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT harrisonheather thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT robertsonsusan thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT weidmannanitae thestandardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT earlepaynekatie standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT forsythpaul standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT johnsonchrisf standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT harrisonheather standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT robertsonsusan standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy AT weidmannanitae standardsofpracticefordeliveryofpolypharmacyandchronicdiseasemedicationreviewsbygeneralpracticeclinicalpharmacistsaconsensusstudy |