Cargando…
An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme
BACKGROUND: High variability in the definition and interpretation of organized cancer screening needs to be addressed systematically. Moreover, the relevance of the current practice of categorizing screening programmes dichotomously into organized or non-organized needs to be revisited in the contex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8941752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7 |
_version_ | 1784673167476785152 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Li Carvalho, André L. Mosquera, Isabel Wen, Tianmeng Lucas, Eric Sauvaget, Catherine Muwonge, Richard Arbyn, Marc Weiderpass, Elisabete Basu, Partha |
author_facet | Zhang, Li Carvalho, André L. Mosquera, Isabel Wen, Tianmeng Lucas, Eric Sauvaget, Catherine Muwonge, Richard Arbyn, Marc Weiderpass, Elisabete Basu, Partha |
author_sort | Zhang, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High variability in the definition and interpretation of organized cancer screening needs to be addressed systematically. Moreover, the relevance of the current practice of categorizing screening programmes dichotomously into organized or non-organized needs to be revisited in the context of considerable heterogeneity that exists in the delivery of cancer screening in the real world. We aimed to identify the essential and desirable criteria for organized cancer screening that serve as a charter of best practices in cancer screening. METHODS: We first did a systematic review of literature to arrive at an exhaustive list of criteria used by various publications to describe or define organized cancer screening, based on which, a consolidated list of criteria was generated. Next, we used a Delphi process comprising of two rounds of online surveys to seek agreement of experts to categorize each criterion into essential, desirable, or neither. Consensus was considered to have been achieved based on a predetermined criterion of agreement from at least 80% of the experts. The outcomes were presented before the experts in a virtual meeting for feedbacks and clarifications. RESULTS: A total of 32 consolidated criteria for an organized screening programme were identified and presented to 24 experts from 20 countries to select the essential criteria in the Delphi first round. Total 16 criteria were selected as essential with the topmost criteria (based on the agreement of 96% of experts) being the availability of a protocol/guideline describing at least the target population, screening intervals, screening tests, referral pathway, management of positive cases and a system being in place to identify the eligible populations. In the second round of Delphi, the experts selected eight desirable criteria out of the rest 16. The most agreed upon desirable criterion was existence of a specified organization or a team responsible for programme implementation and/or coordination. CONCLUSIONS: We established an international consensus on essential and desirable criteria, which screening programmes would aspire to fulfil to be better-organized. The harmonized criteria are a ready-to-use guide for programme managers and policymakers to prioritize interventions and resources rather than supporting the dichotomous and simplistic approach of categorizing programmes as organized or non-organized. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8941752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89417522022-03-24 An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme Zhang, Li Carvalho, André L. Mosquera, Isabel Wen, Tianmeng Lucas, Eric Sauvaget, Catherine Muwonge, Richard Arbyn, Marc Weiderpass, Elisabete Basu, Partha BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: High variability in the definition and interpretation of organized cancer screening needs to be addressed systematically. Moreover, the relevance of the current practice of categorizing screening programmes dichotomously into organized or non-organized needs to be revisited in the context of considerable heterogeneity that exists in the delivery of cancer screening in the real world. We aimed to identify the essential and desirable criteria for organized cancer screening that serve as a charter of best practices in cancer screening. METHODS: We first did a systematic review of literature to arrive at an exhaustive list of criteria used by various publications to describe or define organized cancer screening, based on which, a consolidated list of criteria was generated. Next, we used a Delphi process comprising of two rounds of online surveys to seek agreement of experts to categorize each criterion into essential, desirable, or neither. Consensus was considered to have been achieved based on a predetermined criterion of agreement from at least 80% of the experts. The outcomes were presented before the experts in a virtual meeting for feedbacks and clarifications. RESULTS: A total of 32 consolidated criteria for an organized screening programme were identified and presented to 24 experts from 20 countries to select the essential criteria in the Delphi first round. Total 16 criteria were selected as essential with the topmost criteria (based on the agreement of 96% of experts) being the availability of a protocol/guideline describing at least the target population, screening intervals, screening tests, referral pathway, management of positive cases and a system being in place to identify the eligible populations. In the second round of Delphi, the experts selected eight desirable criteria out of the rest 16. The most agreed upon desirable criterion was existence of a specified organization or a team responsible for programme implementation and/or coordination. CONCLUSIONS: We established an international consensus on essential and desirable criteria, which screening programmes would aspire to fulfil to be better-organized. The harmonized criteria are a ready-to-use guide for programme managers and policymakers to prioritize interventions and resources rather than supporting the dichotomous and simplistic approach of categorizing programmes as organized or non-organized. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8941752/ /pubmed/35317783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Li Carvalho, André L. Mosquera, Isabel Wen, Tianmeng Lucas, Eric Sauvaget, Catherine Muwonge, Richard Arbyn, Marc Weiderpass, Elisabete Basu, Partha An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title | An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title_full | An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title_fullStr | An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title_full_unstemmed | An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title_short | An international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
title_sort | international consensus on the essential and desirable criteria for an ‘organized’ cancer screening programme |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8941752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02291-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangli aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT carvalhoandrel aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT mosqueraisabel aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT wentianmeng aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT lucaseric aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT sauvagetcatherine aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT muwongerichard aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT arbynmarc aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT weiderpasselisabete aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT basupartha aninternationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT zhangli internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT carvalhoandrel internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT mosqueraisabel internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT wentianmeng internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT lucaseric internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT sauvagetcatherine internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT muwongerichard internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT arbynmarc internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT weiderpasselisabete internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme AT basupartha internationalconsensusontheessentialanddesirablecriteriaforanorganizedcancerscreeningprogramme |