Cargando…

Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy

Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yildirim, Ali Cihat, Zeren, Sezgin, Ekici, Mehmet Fatih, Yaylak, Faik, Algin, Mustafa Cem, Arik, Ozlem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345702
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441
_version_ 1784673248153174016
author Yildirim, Ali Cihat
Zeren, Sezgin
Ekici, Mehmet Fatih
Yaylak, Faik
Algin, Mustafa Cem
Arik, Ozlem
author_facet Yildirim, Ali Cihat
Zeren, Sezgin
Ekici, Mehmet Fatih
Yaylak, Faik
Algin, Mustafa Cem
Arik, Ozlem
author_sort Yildirim, Ali Cihat
collection PubMed
description Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study aimed to analyse our subtotal cholecystectomy results for difficult cholecystectomy cases and to evaluate the fenestrating and reconstituting techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected and analysed statistically for cases that underwent subtotal cholecystectomy in a single referral centre between 2015 and 2020. Comparisons were made of the patients’ age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, surgical timing, surgical procedure choice, postoperative complications, and mortality. Results The number of patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy was 46; 30.4% underwent emergent surgery and 69.6% underwent elective surgery. Twelve patients had subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy and 34 had subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. Wound issues were noted in 17.4% of the patients, while 10.9% had temporary biliary fistulas that resolved spontaneously. Reoperation was performed in one patient due to high-output biliary drainage. Patients with postoperative complications had significantly higher co-morbid conditions (p=0.000), but surgery timing (p=0.192) and type of subtotal cholecystectomy (p=0.409) had no statistically significant effect on complications. Mortality showed a statistically significant correlation with patient comorbidities, surgery timing, and the type of procedure (p<0.05). Postoperative complications showed a statistically significant correlation with mortality (p<0.05). Conclusion Subtotal cholecystectomy prevents major biliary complications after cholecystectomy. Yet, the frequency of postoperative complications after subtotal cholecystectomy is incontrovertible. Intraoperative characteristics and the surgeon’s expertise decide the optimal choice of the subtotal cholecystectomy technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8942168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89421682022-03-27 Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy Yildirim, Ali Cihat Zeren, Sezgin Ekici, Mehmet Fatih Yaylak, Faik Algin, Mustafa Cem Arik, Ozlem Cureus General Surgery Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study aimed to analyse our subtotal cholecystectomy results for difficult cholecystectomy cases and to evaluate the fenestrating and reconstituting techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected and analysed statistically for cases that underwent subtotal cholecystectomy in a single referral centre between 2015 and 2020. Comparisons were made of the patients’ age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, surgical timing, surgical procedure choice, postoperative complications, and mortality. Results The number of patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy was 46; 30.4% underwent emergent surgery and 69.6% underwent elective surgery. Twelve patients had subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy and 34 had subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. Wound issues were noted in 17.4% of the patients, while 10.9% had temporary biliary fistulas that resolved spontaneously. Reoperation was performed in one patient due to high-output biliary drainage. Patients with postoperative complications had significantly higher co-morbid conditions (p=0.000), but surgery timing (p=0.192) and type of subtotal cholecystectomy (p=0.409) had no statistically significant effect on complications. Mortality showed a statistically significant correlation with patient comorbidities, surgery timing, and the type of procedure (p<0.05). Postoperative complications showed a statistically significant correlation with mortality (p<0.05). Conclusion Subtotal cholecystectomy prevents major biliary complications after cholecystectomy. Yet, the frequency of postoperative complications after subtotal cholecystectomy is incontrovertible. Intraoperative characteristics and the surgeon’s expertise decide the optimal choice of the subtotal cholecystectomy technique. Cureus 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8942168/ /pubmed/35345702 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441 Text en Copyright © 2022, Yildirim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Yildirim, Ali Cihat
Zeren, Sezgin
Ekici, Mehmet Fatih
Yaylak, Faik
Algin, Mustafa Cem
Arik, Ozlem
Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title_full Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title_short Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
title_sort comparison of fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy techniques in difficult cholecystectomy
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345702
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441
work_keys_str_mv AT yildirimalicihat comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy
AT zerensezgin comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy
AT ekicimehmetfatih comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy
AT yaylakfaik comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy
AT alginmustafacem comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy
AT arikozlem comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy