Cargando…
Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy
Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345702 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441 |
_version_ | 1784673248153174016 |
---|---|
author | Yildirim, Ali Cihat Zeren, Sezgin Ekici, Mehmet Fatih Yaylak, Faik Algin, Mustafa Cem Arik, Ozlem |
author_facet | Yildirim, Ali Cihat Zeren, Sezgin Ekici, Mehmet Fatih Yaylak, Faik Algin, Mustafa Cem Arik, Ozlem |
author_sort | Yildirim, Ali Cihat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study aimed to analyse our subtotal cholecystectomy results for difficult cholecystectomy cases and to evaluate the fenestrating and reconstituting techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected and analysed statistically for cases that underwent subtotal cholecystectomy in a single referral centre between 2015 and 2020. Comparisons were made of the patients’ age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, surgical timing, surgical procedure choice, postoperative complications, and mortality. Results The number of patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy was 46; 30.4% underwent emergent surgery and 69.6% underwent elective surgery. Twelve patients had subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy and 34 had subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. Wound issues were noted in 17.4% of the patients, while 10.9% had temporary biliary fistulas that resolved spontaneously. Reoperation was performed in one patient due to high-output biliary drainage. Patients with postoperative complications had significantly higher co-morbid conditions (p=0.000), but surgery timing (p=0.192) and type of subtotal cholecystectomy (p=0.409) had no statistically significant effect on complications. Mortality showed a statistically significant correlation with patient comorbidities, surgery timing, and the type of procedure (p<0.05). Postoperative complications showed a statistically significant correlation with mortality (p<0.05). Conclusion Subtotal cholecystectomy prevents major biliary complications after cholecystectomy. Yet, the frequency of postoperative complications after subtotal cholecystectomy is incontrovertible. Intraoperative characteristics and the surgeon’s expertise decide the optimal choice of the subtotal cholecystectomy technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8942168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89421682022-03-27 Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy Yildirim, Ali Cihat Zeren, Sezgin Ekici, Mehmet Fatih Yaylak, Faik Algin, Mustafa Cem Arik, Ozlem Cureus General Surgery Purpose Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Although laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach, it cannot prevent biliary injuries. Subtotal cholecystectomy has been performed mainly to prevent biliary injuries during difficult cholecystectomies. This study aimed to analyse our subtotal cholecystectomy results for difficult cholecystectomy cases and to evaluate the fenestrating and reconstituting techniques. Methods Retrospective data were collected and analysed statistically for cases that underwent subtotal cholecystectomy in a single referral centre between 2015 and 2020. Comparisons were made of the patients’ age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, surgical timing, surgical procedure choice, postoperative complications, and mortality. Results The number of patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy was 46; 30.4% underwent emergent surgery and 69.6% underwent elective surgery. Twelve patients had subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy and 34 had subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. Wound issues were noted in 17.4% of the patients, while 10.9% had temporary biliary fistulas that resolved spontaneously. Reoperation was performed in one patient due to high-output biliary drainage. Patients with postoperative complications had significantly higher co-morbid conditions (p=0.000), but surgery timing (p=0.192) and type of subtotal cholecystectomy (p=0.409) had no statistically significant effect on complications. Mortality showed a statistically significant correlation with patient comorbidities, surgery timing, and the type of procedure (p<0.05). Postoperative complications showed a statistically significant correlation with mortality (p<0.05). Conclusion Subtotal cholecystectomy prevents major biliary complications after cholecystectomy. Yet, the frequency of postoperative complications after subtotal cholecystectomy is incontrovertible. Intraoperative characteristics and the surgeon’s expertise decide the optimal choice of the subtotal cholecystectomy technique. Cureus 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8942168/ /pubmed/35345702 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441 Text en Copyright © 2022, Yildirim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Yildirim, Ali Cihat Zeren, Sezgin Ekici, Mehmet Fatih Yaylak, Faik Algin, Mustafa Cem Arik, Ozlem Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title | Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title_full | Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title_short | Comparison of Fenestrating and Reconstituting Subtotal Cholecystectomy Techniques in Difficult Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | comparison of fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy techniques in difficult cholecystectomy |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345702 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yildirimalicihat comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy AT zerensezgin comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy AT ekicimehmetfatih comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy AT yaylakfaik comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy AT alginmustafacem comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy AT arikozlem comparisonoffenestratingandreconstitutingsubtotalcholecystectomytechniquesindifficultcholecystectomy |