Cargando…
Development of forensic standards in China: a review
Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35341121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877 |
_version_ | 1784673320246968320 |
---|---|
author | He, Xiaodan Li, Chengtao |
author_facet | He, Xiaodan Li, Chengtao |
author_sort | He, Xiaodan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated appraisals undermined judicial authority and credibility. Thus, a law was published in 2005 to improve the uniform forensic management system by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, leading to the establishment of the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice in 2006. During this process, the increased accreditation and interflow highlighted the role of consensus in forensic standards for forensic service providers to avoid uncertainty regarding the methods used and interpretation of results. In 2017, a policy document was promulgated again to strengthen the importance of the uniform standards, which also proposed to establish a new national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science by the General Office of the State Council. In 2018, despite the continuing problems concerning uniformity, the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice was merged into the Public Legal Services Administration. Yet, there is still a long way to go for the national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science. This paper analyses the evolution of forensic standards internationally and nationally, discusses the existing problems, and proposes relative solutions. Moreover, it discusses the future of standards development with the deepening of the reformation of both the national standardization and judicial system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8942513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89425132022-03-24 Development of forensic standards in China: a review He, Xiaodan Li, Chengtao Forensic Sci Res Review Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated appraisals undermined judicial authority and credibility. Thus, a law was published in 2005 to improve the uniform forensic management system by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, leading to the establishment of the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice in 2006. During this process, the increased accreditation and interflow highlighted the role of consensus in forensic standards for forensic service providers to avoid uncertainty regarding the methods used and interpretation of results. In 2017, a policy document was promulgated again to strengthen the importance of the uniform standards, which also proposed to establish a new national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science by the General Office of the State Council. In 2018, despite the continuing problems concerning uniformity, the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice was merged into the Public Legal Services Administration. Yet, there is still a long way to go for the national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science. This paper analyses the evolution of forensic standards internationally and nationally, discusses the existing problems, and proposes relative solutions. Moreover, it discusses the future of standards development with the deepening of the reformation of both the national standardization and judicial system. Taylor & Francis 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8942513/ /pubmed/35341121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review He, Xiaodan Li, Chengtao Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title | Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title_full | Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title_fullStr | Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title_short | Development of forensic standards in China: a review |
title_sort | development of forensic standards in china: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35341121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hexiaodan developmentofforensicstandardsinchinaareview AT lichengtao developmentofforensicstandardsinchinaareview |