Cargando…

Development of forensic standards in China: a review

Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xiaodan, Li, Chengtao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35341121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877
_version_ 1784673320246968320
author He, Xiaodan
Li, Chengtao
author_facet He, Xiaodan
Li, Chengtao
author_sort He, Xiaodan
collection PubMed
description Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated appraisals undermined judicial authority and credibility. Thus, a law was published in 2005 to improve the uniform forensic management system by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, leading to the establishment of the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice in 2006. During this process, the increased accreditation and interflow highlighted the role of consensus in forensic standards for forensic service providers to avoid uncertainty regarding the methods used and interpretation of results. In 2017, a policy document was promulgated again to strengthen the importance of the uniform standards, which also proposed to establish a new national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science by the General Office of the State Council. In 2018, despite the continuing problems concerning uniformity, the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice was merged into the Public Legal Services Administration. Yet, there is still a long way to go for the national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science. This paper analyses the evolution of forensic standards internationally and nationally, discusses the existing problems, and proposes relative solutions. Moreover, it discusses the future of standards development with the deepening of the reformation of both the national standardization and judicial system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8942513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89425132022-03-24 Development of forensic standards in China: a review He, Xiaodan Li, Chengtao Forensic Sci Res Review Forensic science is crucial for the administration of justice and case investigation. In China, political-legal organizations, including the courts, public security, procuratorate, and judicial administration, developed their own forensic practices before 2004. As a result, the frequent and repeated appraisals undermined judicial authority and credibility. Thus, a law was published in 2005 to improve the uniform forensic management system by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, leading to the establishment of the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice in 2006. During this process, the increased accreditation and interflow highlighted the role of consensus in forensic standards for forensic service providers to avoid uncertainty regarding the methods used and interpretation of results. In 2017, a policy document was promulgated again to strengthen the importance of the uniform standards, which also proposed to establish a new national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science by the General Office of the State Council. In 2018, despite the continuing problems concerning uniformity, the Forensic Administration of the Ministry of Justice was merged into the Public Legal Services Administration. Yet, there is still a long way to go for the national technical committee for the standardization of forensic science. This paper analyses the evolution of forensic standards internationally and nationally, discusses the existing problems, and proposes relative solutions. Moreover, it discusses the future of standards development with the deepening of the reformation of both the national standardization and judicial system. Taylor & Francis 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8942513/ /pubmed/35341121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
He, Xiaodan
Li, Chengtao
Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title_full Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title_fullStr Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title_full_unstemmed Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title_short Development of forensic standards in China: a review
title_sort development of forensic standards in china: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35341121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1912877
work_keys_str_mv AT hexiaodan developmentofforensicstandardsinchinaareview
AT lichengtao developmentofforensicstandardsinchinaareview