Cargando…

Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment

Nowadays, there is a problem related to wastewater handling which is released from different activities. The electrocoagulation method has been a dominant treatment method for wastewater treatment. There are different forms of electrocoagulation methods for wastewater treatment. Nevertheless, there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mengistu, Lelisa Regea, Samuel, Zerihun Asmelash, Kitila, Chali Dereje, Bayu, Abreham Bekele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3477995
_version_ 1784673359798206464
author Mengistu, Lelisa Regea
Samuel, Zerihun Asmelash
Kitila, Chali Dereje
Bayu, Abreham Bekele
author_facet Mengistu, Lelisa Regea
Samuel, Zerihun Asmelash
Kitila, Chali Dereje
Bayu, Abreham Bekele
author_sort Mengistu, Lelisa Regea
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, there is a problem related to wastewater handling which is released from different activities. The electrocoagulation method has been a dominant treatment method for wastewater treatment. There are different forms of electrocoagulation methods for wastewater treatment. Nevertheless, there was no comparison made for the removal efficiency of the sonoalternate current (SAC), alternate current (AC), sonodirect current (SDC), and direct current (DC) electrocoagulation process. The efficiency of electrocoagulation methods was compared for their removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from Jimma University domestic wastewater. Batch Reactor DC/AC electrocoagulation cell was used to determine the removal efficiency. During the comparison, the response surface methodology (RSM) was used to analyze and optimize the data taken from the laboratory. Besides, ANOVA was used to analyze the interaction effects of different parameters. The removal of COD from domestic wastewater was achieved with DCE, ACE, SDCE, and SACE which were 82.6%, 86.58%, 88.6%, and 92.5%, respectively, under optimal experimental conditions. From the finding, SACE was more successful at removing % COD than the DCE, ACE, and SDCE methods. For DCE and SDCE, the formation of an impermeable oxide layer at the cathode and the occurrence of corrosion at the anode due to oxidation made the COD removal process less efficient compared with SACE processes. From the experimental results it can be concluded that the SACE has the lowest power consumption and higher process efficiency than the other EC methods and can be a promising solution for removing pollutants from domestic wastewater.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8942696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89426962022-03-24 Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Mengistu, Lelisa Regea Samuel, Zerihun Asmelash Kitila, Chali Dereje Bayu, Abreham Bekele Int J Anal Chem Research Article Nowadays, there is a problem related to wastewater handling which is released from different activities. The electrocoagulation method has been a dominant treatment method for wastewater treatment. There are different forms of electrocoagulation methods for wastewater treatment. Nevertheless, there was no comparison made for the removal efficiency of the sonoalternate current (SAC), alternate current (AC), sonodirect current (SDC), and direct current (DC) electrocoagulation process. The efficiency of electrocoagulation methods was compared for their removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) from Jimma University domestic wastewater. Batch Reactor DC/AC electrocoagulation cell was used to determine the removal efficiency. During the comparison, the response surface methodology (RSM) was used to analyze and optimize the data taken from the laboratory. Besides, ANOVA was used to analyze the interaction effects of different parameters. The removal of COD from domestic wastewater was achieved with DCE, ACE, SDCE, and SACE which were 82.6%, 86.58%, 88.6%, and 92.5%, respectively, under optimal experimental conditions. From the finding, SACE was more successful at removing % COD than the DCE, ACE, and SDCE methods. For DCE and SDCE, the formation of an impermeable oxide layer at the cathode and the occurrence of corrosion at the anode due to oxidation made the COD removal process less efficient compared with SACE processes. From the experimental results it can be concluded that the SACE has the lowest power consumption and higher process efficiency than the other EC methods and can be a promising solution for removing pollutants from domestic wastewater. Hindawi 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8942696/ /pubmed/35340980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3477995 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lelisa Regea Mengistu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mengistu, Lelisa Regea
Samuel, Zerihun Asmelash
Kitila, Chali Dereje
Bayu, Abreham Bekele
Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title_full Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title_fullStr Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title_short Comparison Study on Sonodirect and Sonoalternate Current Electrocoagulation Process for Domestic Wastewater Treatment
title_sort comparison study on sonodirect and sonoalternate current electrocoagulation process for domestic wastewater treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3477995
work_keys_str_mv AT mengistulelisaregea comparisonstudyonsonodirectandsonoalternatecurrentelectrocoagulationprocessfordomesticwastewatertreatment
AT samuelzerihunasmelash comparisonstudyonsonodirectandsonoalternatecurrentelectrocoagulationprocessfordomesticwastewatertreatment
AT kitilachalidereje comparisonstudyonsonodirectandsonoalternatecurrentelectrocoagulationprocessfordomesticwastewatertreatment
AT bayuabrehambekele comparisonstudyonsonodirectandsonoalternatecurrentelectrocoagulationprocessfordomesticwastewatertreatment