Cargando…
Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort
BACKGROUND: Triple negative Breast tumor (TNBC) is an aggressive tumor with sparse data worldwide. METHODS: We analyzed non-metastatic TNBC from 2013 to 2019 for demographics, practice patterns, and survival by the Kaplan Meir method. Prognostic factors for OS and DFS were evaluated using Cox Propor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.011 |
_version_ | 1784673399048503296 |
---|---|
author | Bajpai, Jyoti Kashyap, Lakhan Vallathol, Dilip Harindran Das, Ankita Singh, Maneesh Pathak, Reema Rath, Sushmita Sekar, Anbarasan Mohanta, Subham Reddy, Asha Joshi, Shalaka Nandhana, Ravindra Ravind, Rahul Wadasadawala, Tabassum Nair, Nita Ghosh, Jaya Parmar, Vani Gulia, Seema Desai, Sangeeta Shet, Tanuja Thakur, Meenakshi Patil, Asawari Sarin, Rajiv Gupta, Sudeep Badwe, Rajendra |
author_facet | Bajpai, Jyoti Kashyap, Lakhan Vallathol, Dilip Harindran Das, Ankita Singh, Maneesh Pathak, Reema Rath, Sushmita Sekar, Anbarasan Mohanta, Subham Reddy, Asha Joshi, Shalaka Nandhana, Ravindra Ravind, Rahul Wadasadawala, Tabassum Nair, Nita Ghosh, Jaya Parmar, Vani Gulia, Seema Desai, Sangeeta Shet, Tanuja Thakur, Meenakshi Patil, Asawari Sarin, Rajiv Gupta, Sudeep Badwe, Rajendra |
author_sort | Bajpai, Jyoti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Triple negative Breast tumor (TNBC) is an aggressive tumor with sparse data worldwide. METHODS: We analyzed non-metastatic TNBC from 2013 to 2019 for demographics, practice patterns, and survival by the Kaplan Meir method. Prognostic factors for OS and DFS were evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazard model estimator for univariate and multivariable analysis after checking for collinearity among the variables. RESULTS: There were 1297 patients with median age of 38 years; 41 (33.3%) among 123 tested were BRCA-positives. Among these 593 (45.7%) had stage III disease, 1279 (98.6%) were grade III, 165 (13.0%) had peri-nodal extension (PNE), 212 (16.0%) lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), and 21 (1.6%) were metaplastic; 1256 (96.8%) received chemotherapy including 820 (63.2%) neoadjuvant with 306 (40.0%) pCR. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 155 (12.4%) including two deaths and 3 s-primaries. 1234 (95.2%) underwent surgery [722 (55.7%) breast conservations] and 1034 (79.7%) received radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 54 months, median disease-free (DFS) was 92.2 months and overall survival (OS) was not reached. 5-year estimated DFS and OS was 65.9% and 80.3%. There were 259 (20.0%) failures; predominantly distant (204, 15.7%) - lung (51%), liver (31.8%). In multivariate analysis presence of LVI (HR-2.00, p-0.003), PNE (HR-2.09 p-0.003), older age (HR-1.03, p-0.002) and stage III disease (HR-4.89, p-0.027), were associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: Relatively large contemporary data of non-metastatic TNBC confirms aggressive biology and predominant advanced stage presentation which adversely affects outcomes. The data strongly indicate the unmet need for early detection to optimize care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8942859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89428592022-03-25 Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort Bajpai, Jyoti Kashyap, Lakhan Vallathol, Dilip Harindran Das, Ankita Singh, Maneesh Pathak, Reema Rath, Sushmita Sekar, Anbarasan Mohanta, Subham Reddy, Asha Joshi, Shalaka Nandhana, Ravindra Ravind, Rahul Wadasadawala, Tabassum Nair, Nita Ghosh, Jaya Parmar, Vani Gulia, Seema Desai, Sangeeta Shet, Tanuja Thakur, Meenakshi Patil, Asawari Sarin, Rajiv Gupta, Sudeep Badwe, Rajendra Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: Triple negative Breast tumor (TNBC) is an aggressive tumor with sparse data worldwide. METHODS: We analyzed non-metastatic TNBC from 2013 to 2019 for demographics, practice patterns, and survival by the Kaplan Meir method. Prognostic factors for OS and DFS were evaluated using Cox Proportional Hazard model estimator for univariate and multivariable analysis after checking for collinearity among the variables. RESULTS: There were 1297 patients with median age of 38 years; 41 (33.3%) among 123 tested were BRCA-positives. Among these 593 (45.7%) had stage III disease, 1279 (98.6%) were grade III, 165 (13.0%) had peri-nodal extension (PNE), 212 (16.0%) lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), and 21 (1.6%) were metaplastic; 1256 (96.8%) received chemotherapy including 820 (63.2%) neoadjuvant with 306 (40.0%) pCR. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 155 (12.4%) including two deaths and 3 s-primaries. 1234 (95.2%) underwent surgery [722 (55.7%) breast conservations] and 1034 (79.7%) received radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 54 months, median disease-free (DFS) was 92.2 months and overall survival (OS) was not reached. 5-year estimated DFS and OS was 65.9% and 80.3%. There were 259 (20.0%) failures; predominantly distant (204, 15.7%) - lung (51%), liver (31.8%). In multivariate analysis presence of LVI (HR-2.00, p-0.003), PNE (HR-2.09 p-0.003), older age (HR-1.03, p-0.002) and stage III disease (HR-4.89, p-0.027), were associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: Relatively large contemporary data of non-metastatic TNBC confirms aggressive biology and predominant advanced stage presentation which adversely affects outcomes. The data strongly indicate the unmet need for early detection to optimize care. Elsevier 2022-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8942859/ /pubmed/35334242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.011 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bajpai, Jyoti Kashyap, Lakhan Vallathol, Dilip Harindran Das, Ankita Singh, Maneesh Pathak, Reema Rath, Sushmita Sekar, Anbarasan Mohanta, Subham Reddy, Asha Joshi, Shalaka Nandhana, Ravindra Ravind, Rahul Wadasadawala, Tabassum Nair, Nita Ghosh, Jaya Parmar, Vani Gulia, Seema Desai, Sangeeta Shet, Tanuja Thakur, Meenakshi Patil, Asawari Sarin, Rajiv Gupta, Sudeep Badwe, Rajendra Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title | Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title_full | Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title_short | Outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: Real-world data from a large Indian cohort |
title_sort | outcomes of non-metastatic triple negative breast cancers: real-world data from a large indian cohort |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bajpaijyoti outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT kashyaplakhan outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT vallatholdilipharindran outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT dasankita outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT singhmaneesh outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT pathakreema outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT rathsushmita outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT sekaranbarasan outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT mohantasubham outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT reddyasha outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT joshishalaka outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT nandhanaravindra outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT ravindrahul outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT wadasadawalatabassum outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT nairnita outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT ghoshjaya outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT parmarvani outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT guliaseema outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT desaisangeeta outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT shettanuja outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT thakurmeenakshi outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT patilasawari outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT sarinrajiv outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT guptasudeep outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort AT badwerajendra outcomesofnonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancersrealworlddatafromalargeindiancohort |