Cargando…

Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry

PURPOSE: Identification of unmet needs in person centred and supportive care could be limited by differences in experience across specific cancer populations. Using the experiences of people with lung cancer, we assess distinctions according to demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nartey, Yvonne, Tata, Laila J., Khakwani, Aamir, Beattie, Vanessa, Beckett, Paul, Hubbard, Richard B., Stewart, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06863-4
_version_ 1784673403531165696
author Nartey, Yvonne
Tata, Laila J.
Khakwani, Aamir
Beattie, Vanessa
Beckett, Paul
Hubbard, Richard B.
Stewart, Iain
author_facet Nartey, Yvonne
Tata, Laila J.
Khakwani, Aamir
Beattie, Vanessa
Beckett, Paul
Hubbard, Richard B.
Stewart, Iain
author_sort Nartey, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Identification of unmet needs in person centred and supportive care could be limited by differences in experience across specific cancer populations. Using the experiences of people with lung cancer, we assess distinctions according to demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: The English Cancer Patient Experience Survey was linked to the national cancer registry. The primary outcome was experience of the lung cancer pathway when assessed in multi-question models developed with item response theory. Secondary outcomes were experience by treatment received and in separate dimensions of the care pathway: up to diagnosis, treatment information, and staff support. RESULTS: Responses from 15,967 adults with a lung cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2015 were included. Positive experiences were more likely to be reported by people aged between 65 and 80 (adjusted coefficient 0.08, 95%CI 0.05;0.11), those living in the most deprived areas (adjusted coefficient 0.10, 95%CI 0.05;0.14), diagnosed at lung cancer stage IIA–B (adjusted coefficient 0.09, 95%CI 0.04;0.14), and those diagnosed through inpatient elective admissions (adjusted coefficient 0.17, 95%CI 0.07;0.28). Specific experiences differed across dimensions of care and within lung cancer treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences differed according to gender and ethnicity, supporting previous observations in cancer. In contrast to previous studies, people with lung cancer were more likely to report positive pathway experiences at older ages, living in more deprived areas, or diagnosed after stage I, all frequently associated with worse clinical outcomes. The distinct observations in lung cancer specific analyses suggest potential unmet needs, such as in early stage disease and younger age groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06863-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8942895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89428952022-04-07 Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry Nartey, Yvonne Tata, Laila J. Khakwani, Aamir Beattie, Vanessa Beckett, Paul Hubbard, Richard B. Stewart, Iain Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Identification of unmet needs in person centred and supportive care could be limited by differences in experience across specific cancer populations. Using the experiences of people with lung cancer, we assess distinctions according to demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: The English Cancer Patient Experience Survey was linked to the national cancer registry. The primary outcome was experience of the lung cancer pathway when assessed in multi-question models developed with item response theory. Secondary outcomes were experience by treatment received and in separate dimensions of the care pathway: up to diagnosis, treatment information, and staff support. RESULTS: Responses from 15,967 adults with a lung cancer diagnosis between 2009 and 2015 were included. Positive experiences were more likely to be reported by people aged between 65 and 80 (adjusted coefficient 0.08, 95%CI 0.05;0.11), those living in the most deprived areas (adjusted coefficient 0.10, 95%CI 0.05;0.14), diagnosed at lung cancer stage IIA–B (adjusted coefficient 0.09, 95%CI 0.04;0.14), and those diagnosed through inpatient elective admissions (adjusted coefficient 0.17, 95%CI 0.07;0.28). Specific experiences differed across dimensions of care and within lung cancer treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences differed according to gender and ethnicity, supporting previous observations in cancer. In contrast to previous studies, people with lung cancer were more likely to report positive pathway experiences at older ages, living in more deprived areas, or diagnosed after stage I, all frequently associated with worse clinical outcomes. The distinct observations in lung cancer specific analyses suggest potential unmet needs, such as in early stage disease and younger age groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06863-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8942895/ /pubmed/35106657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06863-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Nartey, Yvonne
Tata, Laila J.
Khakwani, Aamir
Beattie, Vanessa
Beckett, Paul
Hubbard, Richard B.
Stewart, Iain
Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title_full Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title_fullStr Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title_full_unstemmed Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title_short Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry
title_sort using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the english cancer patient experience survey linked with the national cancer registry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06863-4
work_keys_str_mv AT narteyyvonne usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT tatalailaj usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT khakwaniaamir usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT beattievanessa usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT beckettpaul usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT hubbardrichardb usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry
AT stewartiain usingpatientexperiencestoevaluatecareandexpectationsinlungcanceranalysisoftheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurveylinkedwiththenationalcancerregistry