Cargando…

Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamazaki, Hideya, Masui, Koji, Suzuki, Gen, Aibe, Norihiro, Shimizu, Daisuke, Kimoto, Takuya, Yamada, Kei, Ueno, Akihisa, Matsugasumi, Toru, Yamada, Yasuhiro, Shiraishi, Takumi, Fujihara, Atsuko, Yoshida, Ken, Nakamura, Satoaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0
_version_ 1784673422303821824
author Yamazaki, Hideya
Masui, Koji
Suzuki, Gen
Aibe, Norihiro
Shimizu, Daisuke
Kimoto, Takuya
Yamada, Kei
Ueno, Akihisa
Matsugasumi, Toru
Yamada, Yasuhiro
Shiraishi, Takumi
Fujihara, Atsuko
Yoshida, Ken
Nakamura, Satoaki
author_facet Yamazaki, Hideya
Masui, Koji
Suzuki, Gen
Aibe, Norihiro
Shimizu, Daisuke
Kimoto, Takuya
Yamada, Kei
Ueno, Akihisa
Matsugasumi, Toru
Yamada, Yasuhiro
Shiraishi, Takumi
Fujihara, Atsuko
Yoshida, Ken
Nakamura, Satoaki
author_sort Yamazaki, Hideya
collection PubMed
description To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT ± EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade ≥ 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT ± EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093–1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774–7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT ± EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED ≥ 226 Gy(1.5), showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy(1.5)) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT ± EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT ± EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8942991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89429912022-03-28 Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer Yamazaki, Hideya Masui, Koji Suzuki, Gen Aibe, Norihiro Shimizu, Daisuke Kimoto, Takuya Yamada, Kei Ueno, Akihisa Matsugasumi, Toru Yamada, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Takumi Fujihara, Atsuko Yoshida, Ken Nakamura, Satoaki Sci Rep Article To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT ± EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade ≥ 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT ± EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093–1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774–7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT ± EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED ≥ 226 Gy(1.5), showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy(1.5)) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT ± EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT ± EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8942991/ /pubmed/35322160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Yamazaki, Hideya
Masui, Koji
Suzuki, Gen
Aibe, Norihiro
Shimizu, Daisuke
Kimoto, Takuya
Yamada, Kei
Ueno, Akihisa
Matsugasumi, Toru
Yamada, Yasuhiro
Shiraishi, Takumi
Fujihara, Atsuko
Yoshida, Ken
Nakamura, Satoaki
Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title_full Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title_short Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
title_sort comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yamazakihideya comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT masuikoji comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT suzukigen comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT aibenorihiro comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT shimizudaisuke comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT kimototakuya comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yamadakei comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT uenoakihisa comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT matsugasumitoru comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yamadayasuhiro comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT shiraishitakumi comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT fujiharaatsuko comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT yoshidaken comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer
AT nakamurasatoaki comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer