Cargando…
Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0 |
_version_ | 1784673422303821824 |
---|---|
author | Yamazaki, Hideya Masui, Koji Suzuki, Gen Aibe, Norihiro Shimizu, Daisuke Kimoto, Takuya Yamada, Kei Ueno, Akihisa Matsugasumi, Toru Yamada, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Takumi Fujihara, Atsuko Yoshida, Ken Nakamura, Satoaki |
author_facet | Yamazaki, Hideya Masui, Koji Suzuki, Gen Aibe, Norihiro Shimizu, Daisuke Kimoto, Takuya Yamada, Kei Ueno, Akihisa Matsugasumi, Toru Yamada, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Takumi Fujihara, Atsuko Yoshida, Ken Nakamura, Satoaki |
author_sort | Yamazaki, Hideya |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT ± EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade ≥ 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT ± EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093–1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774–7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT ± EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED ≥ 226 Gy(1.5), showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy(1.5)) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT ± EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT ± EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8942991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89429912022-03-28 Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer Yamazaki, Hideya Masui, Koji Suzuki, Gen Aibe, Norihiro Shimizu, Daisuke Kimoto, Takuya Yamada, Kei Ueno, Akihisa Matsugasumi, Toru Yamada, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Takumi Fujihara, Atsuko Yoshida, Ken Nakamura, Satoaki Sci Rep Article To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT ± EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade ≥ 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT ± EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093–1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774–7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT ± EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED ≥ 226 Gy(1.5), showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy(1.5)) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT ± EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT ± EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8942991/ /pubmed/35322160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yamazaki, Hideya Masui, Koji Suzuki, Gen Aibe, Norihiro Shimizu, Daisuke Kimoto, Takuya Yamada, Kei Ueno, Akihisa Matsugasumi, Toru Yamada, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Takumi Fujihara, Atsuko Yoshida, Ken Nakamura, Satoaki Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title | Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_full | Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_short | Comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
title_sort | comparison of toxicities between ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy versus brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09120-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamazakihideya comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT masuikoji comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT suzukigen comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT aibenorihiro comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT shimizudaisuke comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT kimototakuya comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yamadakei comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT uenoakihisa comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT matsugasumitoru comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yamadayasuhiro comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT shiraishitakumi comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT fujiharaatsuko comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT yoshidaken comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer AT nakamurasatoaki comparisonoftoxicitiesbetweenultrahypofractionatedradiotherapyversusbrachytherapywithorwithoutexternalbeamradiotherapyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancer |